You're communicating, and you're only half right. If you're 100% correct, explain to me why 1.) the company hasn't furloughed down to 5 pilots per frame, and 2.) why the company wanted scope relief? Could it be owner demand and pilot availability DOES have something to do with overall pilot staffing?
No argument that recalls will only happen if and when airframes are added. You're dead wrong on staffing being completely driven by airframes, however.
Am I communicating?
1. 5 pilots per airframe is the contractual minimum we negotiated in our CBA -- it's an arbitrary number -- they've never taken staffing down to this level because the actual number to maintain the operation is much higher...
2. If you recall, the request for scope relief happened back in 2010 before we started flying like
gang-busters again. (Remember the infamous March 31st deadline DS gave us before his "fall from grace?")
To me, this indicates their desire for scope relief has never been motivated by demand.....
From where I'm sitting, both of you are 100% correct ....
Demand drives the need for more airframes which in turn, require additional pilots to operate.
Presently however, neither is happening at a rate sufficient to keep up with demand.... We are literally flying the doors off of the jets at the moment, retirement schedules for older airframes have been delayed, the "shadow" group of displacement pilots who were getting paid to sit at home are ALL back to work, yet pilots are having to fatigue with greater and greater frequency due to the higher workload....
The wheels are coming off the bus and we aren't even in the busy season yet....
Because of this, I do have to disagree with both of you on one major point -- regardless of how it may weaken the company bargaining position, I don't believe recalls will wait until a successor CBA is ratified.