Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
wolfpackpilot said:How will the decision go? No clue... but I'm putting my chips on Woodbridge.
h25b said:The facts supporting a single transportation system do not exist in this case. Each Carrier has its own management team that is in charge of day-to-day operations. While individuals in GJ’s management team previously worked for TSA, all of those individuals left their employment with TSA before joining GJ's. TSA was incorporated in Missouri while GJ's is an LLC formed in Delaware, and has no Board of Directors. While TSA and GJ's are commonly owned by TSH for Hulas Kanodia, he has no involvement in the management of either entity, and this factor alone will not support a finding of common control. [FONT=Bookman Old Style,Bookman Old Style]See Allegheny Airlines, Inc., et al., [/FONT]29 NMB
- 36 33 NMB No. 9
160 (2002) (Board found no single transportation system despite the fact that the three carriers at issue were owned by the same holding company, noting each carrier’s separate control over its labor relations and operations).
Labor relations and personnel functions at GJ's and TSA are handled separately. Each Carrier has its own website which lists only its job openings, and each Carrier has its own employment applications and personnel forms. GJ's and TSA have separate terms and conditions of employment, different wage rates, and separate benefit plans. Further, the Carriers maintain separate seniority lists and employee rosters.
GJ's personnel recruit and interview applicants for GJ's positions; TSA personnel perform the same functions for TSA positions. Any work done by TSA or any other entity on GJ’s behalf is temporary and done pursuant to a contractual arrangement. GJ’s temporary outsourcing of some work functions is insufficient to support a single carrier finding. [FONT=Bookman Old Style,Bookman Old Style]See Allegheny Airlines, Inc., et al.[/FONT], [FONT=Bookman Old Style,Bookman Old Style]above[/FONT], at 171 (no single carrier finding even though one carrier performed customer service/ramp functions for the other carriers on a contractual basis).
GJ’s and TSA’s operations are clearly separate. While the Carriers both lease space in the same office building, employees for each Carrier have issued ID badges which only allow them access to their respective offices. Each Carrier has its own payroll and operational bank accounts, its own aircraft and operating and flight manuals, and its own training arrangements. While the paint scheme for each aircraft is determined by the regional partner, GJ's and TSA fleet are identified accordingly, pursuant to DOT regulations, by stickers on each aircraft. Further, all Pilots wear the "brass" of their employing Carrier, GJ's or TSA, when dressed in the standard uniform of their regional partner.
The above is from the recent TSA NMB Ruling. For those who don't think it matters where the paychecks come from I highlighted an interesting sentence...
...
gunfyter said:Did TSA and GJ advertise their fleet on their website like this?
I am convinced! I wonder why Woodbridge wants the petition delayed for three years...wolfpackpilot said:No, but American Airlines and USAir does. Because thats who they fly for!
NJA-NJI-NJE-NJME-EJM
Just fancy names for a code share agreement.