Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Netjets Casino employees

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
FredGarvin said:
Flyer,
I can only speak for myself, but I don’t hate your guts. In practice when I get treated with respect and professionalism, I return it in kind. Unlike you, I have been here years not months. I have seen the change in the relationship between the crews and the casino workers first hand. Right now, it’s the worst I’ve ever seen it and don’t think it stems from how the non-bargaining guys are acting.
-Good, I haven't given you a reason yet.....but it seems the rest of 135/91 has got my number cause I wear a gold tie. The change in attiude is twofold, the strain of a bad situation hitting both sides.... once again, both of us point fingers at each other. Management 1, employees 0.

I have worked in freight, legacy and charter, and I can agree with you that this place is light years ahead of many others. It was never more in evidence when not one employee, pilot or otherwise laid off after 9/11. That’s pretty special in any industry, but it’s downright unheard of in aviation.
- No arguement there.
The company owes you an industry (fractional) leading wage. As near as I can tell that’s pretty close to what’s being offered. I don’t think that because you or I work for BH that there is an unlimited bag of money for either of us.
- No, NO, NO....its about a close as a whale is to a cat. Please red what we were to give up.. just on that alone it put us at a substandard level... but I wont beat a dead horse.. look it up.

As far as the line goes, BB can take the highroad and claim nothing is going on, but the rework created by the increased DNIFs, bogus write-ups and feet dragging is pretty obvious. The crap on this board and in the press has caused many of us who supported you in the beginning to do a 180.

-as for those, there are no woirk actions taking place.. and I'm insulted that someone would consider a bogus write up.....if its broke, and your family is behind me, do you want me to wait till its convinient to fix it?? Not me, Bubba.

Please dont drag us all down, man.. as I had stated before.
 
FredGarvin said:
I have worked in freight, legacy and charter, and I can agree with you that this place is light years ahead of many others. It was never more in evidence when not one employee, pilot or otherwise laid off after 9/11. That’s pretty special in any industry, but it’s downright unheard of in aviation.

If you're implying that no layoffs was due to Santulli's generosity, you've got to be kidding. Business absolutely boomed at EJA following 9/11. They needed more employees, not less.
 
transpac said:
If you're implying that no layoffs was due to Santulli's generosity, you've got to be kidding. Business absolutely boomed at EJA following 9/11. They needed more employees, not less.

WRONG. Even some of the pilots have stated (Grizz for one) that NetJets was long 150-200 pilots in 2002-2003. Did any of these pilots get laid off? NO.

Would they have been laid off at almost any other aviation company? Probably.

You may not want to acknowledge Mr. Santulli's generosity, but there are hundreds of people in the casino (and probably the flight line if they dont get their arms twisted by the teamsters) that can vouch for it.

I'm sure that the old timers havent forgotten how Mr. Santulli paid payroll out of his pocket when the company was in trouble during the early 90's as well.
 
Yes there was a time when we were fat 150 or so pilots.

Don't think that santulli kept them on to show what a great guy he was. He knew it would be a PR nightmare if NetJets was the only one to furlough while FLOPS wasn't. At the time NJ and FLOPS where at each others throat. Furloughing was a sign of weakness neither could afford to show.

Yes the old timers remember how RTS paid out of his own pocket. Does he remember all the sacrifices the pilots have made since then?

A key point to remember is the Teamsters are the Pilots. We have our own local and have spent a lot of time setting it up and running it by the pilots for the pilots. You can bash the teamsters all day long but our local is stronger than any time in the past.

So twist it any way you want. You can either believe the company and that BB is the second coming to Jesus or you can believe the pilots who are working the line every day keeping this company afloat.

Accept it.
 
Diesel said:
Yes there was a time when we were fat 150 or so pilots.

Don't think that santulli kept them on to show what a great guy he was. He knew it would be a PR nightmare if NetJets was the only one to furlough while FLOPS wasn't. At the time NJ and FLOPS where at each others throat. Furloughing was a sign of weakness neither could afford to show.

Yes the old timers remember how RTS paid out of his own pocket. Does he remember all the sacrifices the pilots have made since then?

And defering aircraft deliveries isnt a sign of weakness? NetJets did a lot of that in 2002-2003....if we were in such a struggle with Flops then why would we show that weakness?

Why dont you just acknowledge Mr. Santulli's generosity of carrying 150-200 pilots for 2+ years while we waited for the economy to take off again? In case you want to calculate that number it's in the neighborhood of $20+ million dollars of carrying cost. If Mr. Santulli is as ruthless as you seem intent on implying then I dont think he would hesitate to pick up $20 million...regardless of PR impact.

Diesel said:
A key point to remember is the Teamsters are the Pilots. We have our own local and have spent a lot of time setting it up and running it by the pilots for the pilots. You can bash the teamsters all day long but our local is stronger than any time in the past.

So twist it any way you want. You can either believe the company and that BB is the second coming to Jesus or you can believe the pilots who are working the line every day keeping this company afloat.

Accept it.

Another key point to remember is that Mr. Santulli signs all of our paychecks....not Jimmy Hoffa Jr.

Its entrepreneurs and companies that create jobs, not unions.

So it doesnt matter how strong your union is.....It doesnt create a single job....except maybe all those Teamster leaders whose pay can be found here:

http://www.tdu.org/HoffaWatch/Club2004/club2004.html
 
Last edited:
Now you're saying we were fat for 2 plus years. Nice just keep adding up crap and you still get crap.

We were fat for a couple of months. I'm not sure it can even be proven we were fat because I still flew my arse off during that time.

Remember during this time that we were "fat" the comapny and the union were in negotiations. Being fat on pilots was a nice way to scare the pilots. I do think there was some truth in both sides. We might have been fat on pilots but not for 2 plus years.

Before you say we didn't hire any in 2 plus years and therefor we were fat during that whole time i say NUtS. We didn't hire any pilots because the company thought they could do fine with what they had. They thought that they could show that they were in a downturn when every chief pilot was screaming they needed more pilots

They looked at the 10,000 resume's on their desk and said we can start hiring anytime we want and there would be a line at the door. So they waited and waited. They had told the old MEC that only 300 pilots would be hired over the life of the contract. Now they say 500 this year.... That's fuzzy math. finally the CP's had enough and planes weren't being crewed all over the country. They said lets hire.

And nobody showed. They called all the pilots back and people by that time had found other jobs or didn't want to put their eggs in a Netjets basket. And still nobody shows.

Accept it your on the outside looking in.
 
Actually you're wrong again. The owners pay our paychecks.

If we forget that we're doomed to fail. Owners and customer service are job 1.

Too bad BB will never understand customer service.
 
If you're implying that no layoffs was due to Santulli's generosity, you've got to be kidding. Business absolutely boomed at EJA following 9/11. They needed more employees, not less.

You obviously weren't working there at the time, or you're on a different planet. I think even the hardcores will agree that Santulli showed a lot of class when he could have, and probably should have furloughed people.

Whatever, I'm sure there's no argument that the next time the economy takes a dive he won't be in that kind of mood when it comes to the IBT.
 
Diesel said:
Actually you're wrong again. The owners pay our paychecks.

If we forget that we're doomed to fail. Owners and customer service are job 1.

Too bad BB will never understand customer service.

YOU'RE THE ONE THAT'S WRONG AGAIN DIESEL. Go back and look at what I said, better yet, let me copy it for you:

Another key point to remember is that Mr. Santulli signs all of our paychecks....not Jimmy Hoffa Jr.

If you want to go farther back up the chain, then yes, the owners ultimately pay our wages, but my statement is true - Mr. Santulli signs our paychecks and nowhere in the process does Jimmy Hoffa Jr. have anything to do with it.

The fact that you and your peers choose to fund Hoffa's lifestyle just makes me feel sad for you....
 
FredGarvin said:
If you're implying that no layoffs was due to Santulli's generosity, you've got to be kidding. Business absolutely boomed at EJA following 9/11. They needed more employees, not less.

You obviously weren't working there at the time, or you're on a different planet. I think even the hardcores will agree that Santulli showed a lot of class when he could have, and probably should have furloughed people.

Whatever, I'm sure there's no argument that the next time the economy takes a dive he won't be in that kind of mood when it comes to the IBT.

Very true....especially when the union chooses to try and embarass and humiliate Mr. Santulli as a negotiating tactic rather than trying to bargain with Facts, Logic, and Reason.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top