Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Netjets Casino employees

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
CandyMan said:
Netjets could make a hell of a lot more money if they really wanted too! The waist on the road is absolutely crazy. The folks sitting in the air conditioned/heated "Puzzle Palace" don't see this picture.

The unnecessary ferry flights, hotels, per diem,airline flights, Overtime, Mx, the 100 dollar quarts of oil, Flight Safety charging Netjets more for training than its other customers, airline flights for carpet dances that should have been handled with a phone call

this list goes on and on and on and on forever. The company waists millions each day and no one fixes the problems.

If your sitting in the puzzle palace don't fool yourself. This company blows unneccesary millions each day.

Last I checked the pilots want this stuff fixed. Pilots aren't the ones waisting the money here. Phone call after phone call from the pilots to the puzzle palace with ideas during the day on how to save money and all they get is the answer YOU DONT HAVE THE BIG PICTURE. Thats a gd joke

Candyman - Yes, we waste a lot of money during our daily operations. Contrary to your belief we see it here in the Flight Center as well. Some of this can not be avoided and some can be saved.

I've seen a lot of people make cost saving suggestions. Some have been implemented and money saved. Other times the person making the suggestion did not know all of the details and once they were filled in on the 'bigger picture' they realized that their suggestion wouldnt be the best choice. The important point is that the management was open to suggestions and gave us feedback, yes or no, that the ideas would work....then they acted on the good ones.

I've worked a lot of jobs and this is the most open environment I've seen to suggestions from the employees. Is it perfect? No, but what company is?

I'm still waiting to hear an answer to my earlier question - what Flight Safety customer gets a better price than NetJets?
 
dsptchrNJA said:
The company CAN'T give a raise to them because the union won't allow it - and to think it was regardless of contract negotiations.

It was exactly because of negotiations not regardless of them.

For the sake of this argument, let's posit that you fall into a group of employees called dispatchers. Let's say I decide that I'm having a hard time getting new dispatchers to join our company. I come out as a manager and tell you that I'll pay all new dispatchers $1500 more a month while you get no raise. How are you going to feel about that plan?

The union merely echo'd our thoughts on the issue - pay us all more and you've got a deal.

And I take back my previous supposition...you are that dense.
 
dispatcher

the problems with waste aren't coming from the dispatch area of the puzzle palace. the problems are coming from scheduling and travel. management needs to send these folks out on the road so they can see what the big picture really is.

sounds like you don't understand just how much waste goes on here. each pilot has a story from just about every tour he/she has ever had.

this company doesn't even have a computer system that is able to track different fleets and crews at the same time

i don't know how many times I have seen two different pilots or crews from two different fleets each going the same place and the company has no clue. whether it be a rental car a ferry flight or whatever. its all waste. its out of control. how many pilots get airlined out with one day to go to a broke airplane then turn around and airline home the next day. how many **CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED****CENSORED** examples do you guys need to figure out how much money this place blows for no reason


its not an open environment for pilots. I had an opportunity to save the company about 300 bucks last tour and they blew me off

300 here 300 there 100 here 2000 there x 2100 pilots = millions in waste

Customer Service? Pilots see the customers. Pilots are the front line for Customer Service.

New Hire FO Pay raise? How can it be acceptable to pay a first year FO as much or more than a first year Captain? The equation doesn't work.
 
Last edited:
dsptchrNJA said:
Furthermore, let's not have any more debate on why SIC's are underpaid and the sad stories about food stamps. You have sufficiently given all the answers I need to understand the issue.... The company CAN'T give a raise to them because the union won't allow it - and to think it was regardless of contract negotiations. I wonder how SIC's feel about the Union's representing them this way?

Even if the company wanted to increase pay to attract more qualified pilots, for the union stand in the way of this seems to counteract their purpose.

There is indeed a reason for why the union rejected the pay raise for the F/O's. And it is not counter to the union's purposes. By not allowing the company to pick and choose how to change the contract ala cafeteria-style, the pressure is put on the company to negotiate the entire contract. Given the limited amount of pressure that the union can bring without a strike, if the company has trouble attracting new-hire pilots, it puts some onus on the company to fix the current contract and pay schedules. Ultimately, this benefits the entire union if the pressure brought to bear brings a reasonable offer from the company in negotiations.

As for how the SIC's feel about the union blocking the company's one-off offer to raise F/O pay, the ones I've talked with on the road all feel that we need to keep the eye on the prize and are willing to forgo the raise to keep pressure on in negotiations. Or, perhaps put another way, short-term pain for long-term gain.
 
It is a waste of time arguing with the people at "Fort Fumble". Here is a perfect example of the way they think.....

For all you know, it was the right business decision even if we ended up loosing a buck.

In thier minds it's ok to lose a buck through operating inefficiencies, but God forbid you spend a buck on the people doing the job.

This is a service industry. It's about serving the people in the back remember?
It sure is, and those lousy business decisions that lose a buck are not serving the people in the back.
 
FamilyGuy said:
I've seen a lot of references in this forum about NetJets funneling money out of NJA and off to other NJ companies or to other BRK companies. It seems to me that if that's the case it would be fairly easy to prove. Just show where NetJets is paying more for services than other companies. After all, we are the 800 pound gorilla, so we should get the best price, right?
This is where we have a problem. The company "offers" the books to the union. The problem is, the books offered don't have these transactions in them (we'd need to see all of NetJets, Inc. books, not just NJA).
I'm still waiting to hear an answer to my earlier question - what Flight Safety customer gets a better price than NetJets?
Just about any company with more than one pilot attending training. I signed a 2-year training contract for my Ultra type, for about $16,500 (I don't have it in front of me for the exact figure). I have to assume that that is what NetJets pays FlightSafety, because otherwise it's fraud on NetJets' part. I know that just about any other operator can get a substantial discount from that retail price, as I was looking into a type pre-NetJets and was told as much by the FSI sales manager. You can draw your own conclusions.
 
If you do a full service initial, most operators can get a second initial full service contract for 1/2 price.
 
Geez you guys must know something we do not because we could not get that with 4 aircraft.

Secondly the worth of the contract is the worth of the training, not what they pay.
 
Publishers said:
Geez you guys must know something we do not because we could not get that with 4 aircraft.

I must be a good negotiator ;)

Publishers said:
Secondly the worth of the contract is the worth of the training, not what they pay.

Huh?
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top