Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Napolitano: Scanners are safe, pat-downs discreet

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

DieselDragRacer

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 30, 2006
Posts
11,056
By Janet Napolitano


Nearly a year after a thwarted terrorist attack on a Detroit-bound airliner last Christmas Day, the recent attempt by terrorists to conceal and ship explosive devices aboard aircraft bound for the United States reminds us that al-Qaeda and those inspired by its ideology are determined to strike our global aviation system and are constantly adapting their tactics for doing so.

Our best defense against such threats remains a risk-based, layered security approach that utilizes a range of measures, both seen and unseen, including law enforcement, advanced technology, intelligence, watch-list checks and international collaboration.

This layered approach to aviation security is only as strong as the partnerships upon which it is built. In addition to the more than 50,000 trained transportation security officers, transportation security inspectors, behavior detection officers and canine teams who are on the front lines guarding against threats to the system, we rely on law enforcement and intelligence agencies across the federal government. We require airlines and cargo carriers to carry out specific tasks such as the screening of cargo and passengers overseas. We work closely with local law enforcement officers in airports throughout the country.

And we ask the American people to play an important part of our layered defense. We ask for cooperation, patience and a commitment to vigilance in the face of a determined enemy.

As part of our layered approach, we have expedited the deployment of new Advanced Imaging Technology (AIT) units to help detect concealed metallic and non-metallic threats on passengers. These machines are now in use at airports nationwide, and the vast majority of travelers say they prefer this technology to alternative screening measures.

AIT machines are safe, efficient, and protect passenger privacy. They have been independently evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, and the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, who have all affirmed their safety. And the weapons and other dangerous and prohibited items we've found during AIT screenings have illustrated their security value time and again.
Rigorous privacy safeguards are also in place to protect the traveling public. All images generated by imaging technology are viewed in a walled-off location not visible to the public. The officer assisting the passenger never sees the image, and the officer viewing the image never interacts with the passenger. The imaging technology that we use cannot store, export, print or transmit images.

If an anomaly is detected during screening with AIT, if an alarm occurs after a passenger goes through a walk-through metal detector, or if a passenger opts out of either of these screening methods, we use pat-downs to help detect hidden and dangerous items like the one we saw in the failed terrorist attack last Christmas Day.

Pat-downs have long been one of the many security measures used by the U.S. and countries across the world to make air travel as secure as possible. They're conducted by same-gender officers, and all passengers have the right to request private screening and have a traveling companion present during the screening process.

In the last two weeks we have also implemented a number of measures to strengthen our defenses against an attack using cargo shipments to the U.S.

The deployment of this technology and the implementation of these measures represent the evolution of our national security architecture, an evolution driven by intelligence, risk and a commitment to be one step ahead of those who seek to do us harm.

To fulfill the important role we ask of American travelers, and to be prepared at the security checkpoint this holiday season, be ready to remove everything from your pockets prior to screening. If you have a hidden medical device, bring it to the officer's attention before sceening. We'll be better able to help expedite your screening that way.

As always, we also ask the traveling public to be on the lookout for unattended bags or suspicious activity. Alert travelers have helped thwart plots and crimes in the past, and we encourage everyone to remain vigilant during a time when we know our enemies would like to strike. If you see something suspicious, report it to an airport security official or law enforcement.

Each and every one of the security measures we implement serves an important goal: providing safe and efficient air travel for the millions of people who rely on our aviation system every day.

We face a determined enemy. Our security depends on us being more determined and more creative to adapt to evolving threats. It relies upon a multi-layered approach that leverages the strengths of our international partners, the latest intelligence, and the patience and vigilance of the American traveling public.


Leave your comments under this op-ed here:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/forum/2010-11-15-column15_ST1_N.htm?csp=hf
 
Last edited:
blah blah blah blah blah blah sign away your rights blah blah blah blah blah blah
 
She should show how safe they are by installing them in her office building and have her and her employees pass through them every time they enter and leave the building. She would also be showing that the images are secure as no one would ever even think of copying a nude picture of their boss.
 
These are the same people that told us Agent Orange was safe, too.

Opt out -- while we still can.
 
She should show how safe they are by installing them in her office building and have her and her employees pass through them every time they enter and leave the building. She would also be showing that the images are secure as no one would ever even think of copying a nude picture of their boss.

FI post of the month.

This is what everyone should send back on the comment form.

Good enough for us, good enough for them. Oh yeah, Congress and Senate, too.
 
She should show how safe they are by installing them in her office building and have her and her employees pass through them every time they enter and leave the building. She would also be showing that the images are secure as no one would ever even think of copying a nude picture of their boss.

If i were the poor TSA dude in the backroom saw their head honcho's image, i'd puke my guts out already... A 20 year old college co-ed, another story:)
 
If i were the poor TSA dude in the backroom saw their head honcho's image, i'd puke my guts out already... A 20 year old college co-ed, another story:)


You mean like this one?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sJGvsAgpfig


Here is a good one. Muslim women wearing a burka or hijab are being told they are EXEMPT from TSA pat downs. No way to get my blood to boil more.

Un...freakin.... believable!!

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/cair...99s-head-neck/

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2627489/posts
 
Last edited:
This whole thing will start a passenger retaliation and outrage... it's ( the governement) just gone to far now, these self serving power controlling rules will really make an impact on what method people choose to travel on there next vacation to grandma's.

For the business traveler, this will help further propel companies to incorporate the use of the "go to meeting" or video conferencing tools, or encrease the use of Private jet use..

Forbes had an article this morning about abolishing the TSA and the government waste the new congress wants to get rid of.. I'm all for something different.. as all these billions and disruption of air services has proven one thing.. the terrorists did exactly what they wanted and expected us to do, in effect they accomplished their mission...

Unfortunately, the first to suffer if the traveler numbers drop with be all of us in the aviation businesses..
 
the terrorists did exactly what they wanted and expected us to do, in effect they accomplished their mission...

I've said it since 9/12/2001 - what Mohammad Atta and his jerkoff buddies didnt accomplish yesterday, mark my words, our Gub'mint will...

Sad to say I'm still right!
 
Ridiculous



I'm waiting for someone to intentionally piss their pants just before that pat down.

Now, before I travel, I'll be all about the Chili 5-way from Steak and Shake, with the greasiest fries, pounds of raisin bran - and anything else I can think of which would allow me to cropdust all the way thru the terminal....
 
Big sis Janet should put out a public service video of her being patted down to show us how non invasive it is.
 
For Immediate Release: November 16, 2010​
The Rutherford Institute Defends Airline Pilots, Sues Dept. of Homeland Security & TSA Over Scanners, Virtual Strip Searches & Full-Body 'Rub-Downs'


WASHINGTON, DC -- In a case involving the continuing encroachment of modern technology upon personal privacy, The Rutherford Institute has filed a Fourth Amendment lawsuit in federal court against Janet Napolitano, secretary of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS), and John Pistole, administrator of the Transportation Security Agency (TSA), on behalf of two airline pilots who refused to submit to airport security screening which relies on advanced imaging technology that exposes intimate details of a person's body to government agents.
In opting out of being put through the Whole Body Imaging (WBI) scanners, the pilots, Michael Roberts and Ann Poe, both veterans of the commercial airline industry, also refused to be subjected to the alternative--enhanced, full-body pat- or rub-downs by Transportation Security Agency (TSA) agents. Insisting that the procedures violate the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures found in the U.S. Constitution, The Rutherford Institute's lawsuit asks the court to prohibit DHS and TSA from continuing to unlawfully use WBI technology and newly-implemented enhanced pat-down procedures as the first line of airport security screening in the United States.
The complaint in Michael Roberts, et al., v. Janet Napolitano, et al. is available at www.rutherford.org.
"Forcing Americans to undergo a virtual strip search as a matter of course in reporting to work or boarding an airplane when there is no suspicion of wrongdoing is a grotesque violation of our civil liberties, undermining our right to privacy and to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents," said John W. Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. "Indeed, TSA is forcing travelers to consent to a virtual strip search or allow an unknown officer to literally place his or her hands in your pants."
As airports across the country continue to install the controversial devices, a growing number of Americans are voicing concerns about the impact of the scanners on their privacy rights and the risks they pose to travelers' health.
Collectively, Michael Roberts, a pilot for ExpressJet Airlines, Inc., and Ann Poe, a pilot on the Boeing 777 for Continental Airlines and one of the first 100 women commercial airline pilots in the United States, have more than 50 years of piloting experience and thousands of hours of combined flight time. In two separate incidents taking place on Oct. 15, 2010, and Nov. 4, 2010, respectively, TSA screeners asked Roberts and Poe, who were on their way to work, to submit to WBI scanning or be subjected to a full pat-down frisk of their persons. Upon refusing, both pilots were prevented from passing through security, and unable to report to work on the days in question and since then.
The only alternative to a WBI scan, which has been likened to a "virtual strip-search," is an enhanced pat-down in which TSA screeners press their "open hands and fingers over most parts of an individual's body including the breasts, and uses the back of the hands when touching the buttocks. Additionally, officers slide their hands all the way from the inner thigh up to the groin until the hand cannot venture any higher because it is literally stopped by the person's groin." The complaint alleges that these procedures, which are described as "profane, degrading, intrusive, and indecent," besides being "patently unreasonable," amount to an unreasonable search and seizure of airline employees and travelers passing through security. DHS continues to rapidly deploy WBI scanners throughout U.S. airports, with 491 machines to be deployed by December 2010, and an additional 500 machines in 2011.

 
A guy on a local talk radio show tonight suggested wearing a cup just to see what TSA would say about that..................hmmmm???
 
Ridiculous



I'm waiting for someone to intentionally piss their pants just before that pat down.
I'm sure in the not too distant future we'll read of someone, probably a minor, who pissed in their pants unintentionally during a pat down due to the anxiety of it all. That's gonna be very sad.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom