Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Must be light, a copilot and really really dumb

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

capnflyright

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
176
This is an actual job ad verbatim! Y'all have fun with this one!

Learjet 35 A copilot to perform SIC duties for a pristinely maintained and operated aircraft.

Low utilization Part 91 Lear 35 being operated on oceanic endurance (4.5 hr. legs).
We need a very light copilot (100#s) to assist in moving the CG aft to minimize drag and
Optimize fuel burn/speed/range. We are in the process of executing a weight reduction program which is culminating in the removal of the standard “heavy” America’s/Caribbean Jepp bag in exchange for dual EFBs. Weight in the corporate jet cockpit imposes tremendous performance penalties which ultimately results in excess fuel burn. In the lear, there is frequently not enough fuel to start with. At $6/gal a 200# copilot will easily consume his/her salary in extra fuel burn and lost range each year (having to land short just once a week costs $50k/yr.).

In light of the aforementioned requirements, we’re willing to work with the right candidate. Preference will be given to an organized adventure seeker who enjoys scuba-diving, boating, hiking etc and can be away from home for extended periods of time.
 
At $6/gal a 200# copilot will easily consume his/her salary in extra fuel burn and lost range ...


Let there be no question of the value this organization places on your presence in the cockpit... :rolleyes: If they could operate it single-pilot, they would!
 
I'm surprised it didn't specify that the 100# FO must be a late-model, and have a 60/40 vertical weight distribution and be at least a category "D.":pimp:

It's a jet, not a race horse. The difference between 100# and 150# up front is negligible. How 'bout get EFBs and dump the 50# of Jepps. That way you can expand your hiring profile to people other than elves and jockeys.
 
jeeeze......they left out the part about "candidate must be willing to act as a drag chute in the event of thrust reverser malfunction."
 
So basically ... they want self-moving ballast?
 
Sounds like to me If there worried about weight they need to ask the passengers to diet and not pack some much bags. I've seen it all now, not do you have to meet insurence req. you know have to make weight. LOL
 

Latest resources

Back
Top