Originally posted by philiplane you should be paying about $1000 for the same (50K)hull coverage on a 172, if it's private.
My 172s are used for flight training and rentals, I'm paying $7,300/yr for insurance on them (smooth liability, $75K hull value, $500 deductable, covers everyone who flies it, including students)
commercial twin insurance is about $6500 for the same $50k coverage. so it's almost double the private rate.
$6,500/yr for insurance on a twin sounds cheap... Of course if they require 50 ME time it does no good...
The requirement would have to be a checkout in the twin first, and of course an existing ME rating. Maybe 10 ME total time, 5 in type?
That's far from cheap. but the break-even on a twin is much lower than a single.
Cheap in this business is an oxymoron.
They problem is availability. No one will rent you a twin because the insurance won't let them. Unless you have enough time, them you don't really need to build it, catch 22!
So I need to call my insurance agent...

Ok, fair enough...
I just didn't want to get into too many of those details until I had learned more about the interest of this.
My original question still stands. If you, as a fresh multi-engine rated pilot wanted to build time towards your career, would you buy 100 hours of time in a light twin for $75/hr dry?
Lets say you only had to have 10 ME total time and 5 in type, just for arguements sake...
WW