Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Midwest Air Group Board Determines Revised AirTran Offer is Inadequate;

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

FlyAirtran

Well-known member
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Posts
84
MILWAUKEE, April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The board of directors of Midwest Air Group, Inc. (Amex: MEH - News), parent company of Midwest Airlines, today announced it unanimously recommends that Midwest's shareholders reject AirTran Holdings, Inc.'s (NYSE: AAI - News) revised offer to acquire all outstanding shares of Midwest for a combination of $9.00 in cash and 0.5842 of a share of AirTran common stock. The board advises shareholders not to tender their shares to AirTran.
The board reached its conclusion after discussions with its legal and financial advisors and careful consideration - including a thorough evaluation of the revised AirTran offer, the various alternatives available to Midwest, and Midwest's long-term strategic plan.
"Our board determined that AirTran's revised offer does not take into account the long-term value of our strategic plan," explained Timothy E. Hoeksema, chairman and chief executive officer. "The board believes that Midwest's future holds great promise and that the best interests of all stakeholders lies in Midwest continuing to execute its plan. As the true owners of the company, Midwest shareholders should benefit from the company's long-term plans to continue to create value."
Midwest filed an amendment to Schedule 14D-9 with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) today, which sets forth the reasons for the board's recommendation and related information. These reasons include:

-- AirTran's revised offer is inadequate and does not fully reflect the
long-term value of Midwest's strategic plan, including its strong
market position and future growth prospects.
- The board received an oral opinion from Goldman, Sachs & Co. on April
12, 2007, that as of that date, the revised offer was inadequate from
a financial point of view to Midwest's shareholders (other than
AirTran and its affiliates).
- The board believes that Midwest's strong operating performance in
2006 provides clear evidence of the strength of the strategic plan.
Achievements in 2006 include traffic growth of 21.5%, unit revenue
growth of 12.5% and yield improvement of 5.4%. This strong revenue
performance, combined with Midwest's successful cost-reduction
efforts, generated a $66 million improvement in operating income for
2006 compared with 2005.
- The board noted that the performance of Midwest stock was further
evidence of the success of Midwest's strategy, as the price of the
stock increased by 61% in 2006 prior to the public disclosure of the
AirTran proposal.
- The board maintains that Midwest's strategic initiatives, both those
recently implemented and those planned for the future, will provide
the foundation for profitable growth in 2007 and the years ahead.
Recent strategic initiatives include the establishment of a regional
flying agreement with SkyWest, Inc.; the decision to put two
additional MD-80s into service beginning in mid-2007; the hedge of
approximately 90% of Midwest's 2007 fuel requirements; and numerous
service enhancements implemented since the beginning of this year.
- In recommending rejection of the revised offer, the board considered
Midwest's updated forecast, which reflects the preliminary results of
the first quarter and other developments over the past three months.
-- The board believes that the timing of AirTran's attempts to take over
Midwest is opportunistic and the revised offer is disadvantageous to
Midwest's shareholders. In particular, the board believes that:
- AirTran's attempts to acquire Midwest are timed to take advantage of
the significant strategic initiatives undertaken and investments made
by Midwest during the recent down cycle in the airline industry. The
board believes that industry market conditions will continue to
improve and increasingly favor high-quality carriers like Midwest,
and that AirTran timed the revised offer to acquire Midwest before
these factors are fully reflected in Midwest's share price.
- As of March 31, 2007, Midwest had approximately $171 million of cash,
representing more than $6.50 per share. According to AirTran, the
cash portion of the revised offer and related expenses is
approximately $240 million. Therefore, Midwest's cash on hand
represents more than 70% of the cash estimated by AirTran necessary
to complete the proposed acquisition.
- If the synergies AirTran claims will result from the proposed
combination are realized as AirTran projects, the resulting benefit
to the combined company is not reflected in the value of the
consideration that would be received by Midwest's shareholders under
the revised offer.
- As of December 31, 2006, Midwest had approximately $23 million in net
operating loss tax benefit. A change in control of Midwest could
diminish or delay the realization of this benefit.
-- The value of the consideration being offered by AirTran is uncertain
and highly dependent on the value of AirTran's common stock.
- In assessing the potential consideration to be received under the
revised offer, the board noted the recent stock price performance of
AirTran. During the past 12 months, AirTran's stock price has
declined by 29% compared to a 158% increase in Midwest's stock price
and an approximate 22% increase in an index of network carrier stock
prices (which consists of AMR Corp., UAL Corp., Alaska Airlines,
Continental Airlines and US Airways).
-- Under Wisconsin law and Midwest's Articles of Incorporation, the board
is authorized to consider the interests of stakeholders of Midwest
other than its shareholders - including employees, suppliers, customers
and the communities it serves - when considering an offer of this type.
 
- The board believes that AirTran's plans to operate the combined
company are not credible and would not serve the interests of all
stakeholders. The lack of a credible plan creates uncertainty about
how those interests would actually be served by the combined company.
As noted above, the board took into account the company's updated forecast. While solidly ahead of the same period in 2006, first quarter 2007 revenue performance was slightly below plan. Midwest expects to report a profitable first quarter on a GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) basis. It expects its first quarter loss on a non-GAAP basis to be slightly greater than the loss reported last year on a GAAP basis. Therefore, Midwest now expects its full year 2007 non-GAAP earnings per diluted share to fall in the range of $1.30 to $1.50, which excludes expenses relating to the impact of mark-to-market fuel hedge accounting and costs associated with AirTran's offers. Midwest is unable to provide a forecast of full-year GAAP net earnings at this time.
Midwest believes that these non-GAAP measures, when presented in conjunction with comparable GAAP measures, are useful because that information is an appropriate measure for evaluating Midwest's operating performance as these costs are not directly attributable to the underlying performance of its business operations. Internally, Midwest uses this non-GAAP information as an indicator of business performance and management's effectiveness. These measures should be considered in addition to, not a substitute for, or superior to, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP.
In light of comments received from the staff of the SEC, the board also established a new record date for its Annual Meeting of Shareholders of May 11, 2007 and a new date for its annual meeting of June 14, 2007.
 
Last edited:
whatever...good luck with the growth plan..
 
Honest Question....Why are the Midwest pilots opposed? Its a 20% payraise, stronger combined company, and pretty good integration (1 to 5 or so has been tossed around).
 
from a business standpoint they are only offering 30% more in cash than the company has with a 50% stock swap for the company.

if you didn't want to sell something, would you accept a 30% premium in short term liquidity with only a half equity stake?
 
Honest Question....Why are the Midwest pilots opposed? Its a 20% payraise, stronger combined company, and pretty good integration (1 to 5 or so has been tossed around).

Because they have become accustomed to doing things a certain way and don't want to change. i.e. 25 min turns, different ops., etc...


OK YX said no.. forget about it then...
 
boy you sound like an AA pilot regarding the TWA merger. now you wonder why MEH pilots were leery of the "integration".


I think he's refering to the company. It's nothing personal against the pilots. It's unfortunate that due to some greedy self-centered senior officers the employees of MEI are going to suffer in the long run.

That was our final offer, according to Joe. Now let's let them go ("die on the vine") and move on with our growth plans. There are plenty of other options for growth.
 
I think he's refering to the company. It's nothing personal against the pilots. It's unfortunate that due to some greedy self-centered senior officers the employees of MEI are going to suffer in the long run.

That was our final offer, according to Joe. Now let's let them go ("die on the vine") and move on with our growth plans. There are plenty of other options for growth.

I am curious to figure out where those other options for growth are. You were going to get a new terminal in ATL, but that was delayed when DL entered Bankruptcy, delaying your growth there. You tried to expand a bit in DFW, but AA stopped that. MDW growth has stopped due to a lack of gates. You just announced new LAS service, but you had other LAS flights (to FNT and others) that you dropped when NW started competing. It just seems your management wanted MKE with Midwest to dump new airplanes that they couldn't find homes for anyway. With Skybus and Virgin America jumping in on the scene, it may be more difficult finding more focus cities to base planes. I think Leonard is getting desperate. Good luck.
 
Plenty of farm towns left...get er done I say..move on to plan C...maybe D....who cares....its never dull ..is it fellas...
 
from a business standpoint they are only offering 30% more in cash than the company has with a 50% stock swap for the company.

if you didn't want to sell something, would you accept a 30% premium in short term liquidity with only a half equity stake?
Because as soon as we rescind the offer, it won't be a 30% premium, it'll be closer to a 90% premium.

Lacking a clear order for aircraft, firm financing for that order, and any kind of business plan to make any real money, as soon as AAI drops the offer, your stock will fall back BELOW where it was when this mess started. Bet you a C-note.

I think he's refering to the company. It's nothing personal against the pilots. It's unfortunate that due to some greedy self-centered senior officers the employees of MEI are going to suffer in the long run.
BINGO!

Hoeksema and the rest of the senior management folks don't have a resume stellar enough to obtain a similar-paying position anywhere else in the business world, so they're holding on as long as they can.

Can't blame them on a personal level, but from a fiduciary standpoint, they are doing the shareholders a HUGE disservice.

Not that I mind, I've been against the acquisition from the beginning, although I still don't think the fat lady has sung yet.

That was our final offer, according to Joe. Now let's let them go ("die on the vine") and move on with our growth plans. There are plenty of other options for growth.
Agreed. JL and the MCO boys have made this place profitable for almost a decade now when every year people predicted our near-demise. Somehow I think we're going to be just fine... ;)
 
Don't hold back now, Joe. Tell us how you really feel about it - ROFLMAO!! :D

Facts and Shareholders Don't Matter at Midwest
Friday April 13, 11:23 am ET

AirTran Calls Midwest's Rejection of Recent Offer Irresponsible and Company's Growth Plan Delusional

ORLANDO, Fla., April 13 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- AirTran Holdings, Inc. (NYSE: AAI - News), the parent company of AirTran Airways, today responded to Midwest's rejection of AirTran's enhanced offer and reiterated its commitment to its exchange offer for Midwest Air Group, Inc. (Amex: MEH - News), initially launched on January 11, 2007.

Leonard, AirTran's chairman and chief executive officer stated, "We are disappointed, but unfortunately not surprised, that the Board of Midwest rejected our materially enhanced offer of $15 per share. This kind of behavior flies in the face of good corporate governance and is clearly irresponsible, demonstrating that the Board is derelict in its fiduciary duty to the Midwest shareholders."

As of yesterday's closing price of AirTran's stock, the airline's current offer is worth $15.75 per Midwest share, a substantial premium to the $8.13 the stock was trading at just prior to the public announcement of AirTran's offer.

"We have a difficult time believing their refusal to enter in discussions with us is based on price," said Leonard. "What is even more incredible is that the Board's rejection came after Midwest's management announced the company will miss, by a substantial amount, its 2007 earnings projection put forth only a few short weeks ago. Midwest is just over 100 days into the year, and already lowering its earnings guidance. How can any truly independent Midwest director vote for management's 'standalone, go-it-alone' plan that is already flawed and pass up, without even bothering to discuss with us, the value and certainty the AirTran offer provides?"

"We had hoped that the Board would demonstrate its fiduciary duty by entering into discussions with AirTran to learn more about our offer, which provides shareholders greater value, employees more jobs and career opportunities, passengers increased service at low fares, and the Milwaukee community a stronger hub with greater economic opportunities. Instead the Board of Midwest has chosen to support management's "Just Say No" policy, favoring the entrenchment of its long tenured executives over their obligations to their shareholders and other Midwest stakeholders."

"Moreover, we have outlined a comprehensive plan that demonstrates how AirTran would generate greater service, economic growth and jobs in Milwaukee than the 'stand-alone plan' -- strategic rationale does not appear to be a factor."

"Despite the Board's rejection, we will move forward with our exchange offer and pursue the election of our three nominees to fill positions on the Midwest board of directors at the now rescheduled June 14 annual meeting of the Midwest shareholders. We have already received an outpouring of support from Midwest shareholders who see the compelling benefits of bringing these two airlines together to create a highly efficient airline with a broad national network, better positioned for success in an increasingly competitive environment, and we look forward to hearing their voices on June 14 when they will make known their desire to either continue on the current plan which has reaped no material growth or profits in five years or join with AirTran to create a formidable competitor that will bring greater value to shareholders, jobs to employees, and growth for the Milwaukee region," concluded Leonard.

Midwest shareholders with questions about how to tender their shares may call AirTran's Information Agent, Innisfree M&A Incorporated, toll-free at 877-456-3422. (Banks and Brokers may call collect at 212-750-5833).
 
Last edited:
Dont worry about where AAI might put those 737's... The rumor mill says IND has offered us between 14 and 17 gates in IND when they open the new terminal...
 
Because as soon as we rescind the offer, it won't be a 30% premium, it'll be closer to a 90% premium.

you're not understanding my point. they will still have $170million in cash even if AAI withdraws, hence the 30% cash premium comment.

Lacking a clear order for aircraft, firm financing for that order, and any kind of business plan to make any real money, as soon as AAI drops the offer, your stock will fall back BELOW where it was when this mess started. Bet you a C-note.

it probably will for a short time due to momentum on the down turn, but your stock is down 50% also. why are you happy about this? you sound like a 3rd grader who is taking his toys and running home.

Hoeksema and the rest of the senior management folks don't have a resume stellar enough to obtain a similar-paying position anywhere else in the business world, so they're holding on as long as they can.

again the board is completely separate from senior management. goldman sachs, who made this call, is separate from MEH senior management. you seem like you want this to be personal again.

Can't blame them on a personal level, but from a fiduciary standpoint, they are doing the shareholders a HUGE disservice.

well the EXPERTS that people hire at Goldman Sachs disagree with you. so are we to believe an air tran fo or the folks at goldman sachs?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top