Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Mergers & Acquisitions

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

lowecur

Well-known member
Joined
Sep 14, 2003
Posts
2,317
Picked this up on another board. It's rather interesting as it just may be what you see in the next 12 months. Look for consolidation once UAL gets the ball rolling when they divest themselves of pension obligations. Check out the bold print if you work for UAL or DAL.

Mergers and Acquisitions Coming to the Airline Industry?

The possibility of such a large portion of the industry in bankruptcy at the same time is not just a matter for the record books, but has important ramifications involving antitrust law. The "failing firm" and "existing assets" defenses and exemptions in antitrust law let otherwise anti-competitive deals proceed if the firms and industries attempting to merge are extremely dire straits.

Under those theories of antitrust law, the bankruptcy of Delta could open up a window during which mergers that would never be permitted otherwise could be allowed. The Justice Department blocked UAL’s attempt to buy US Airways on antitrust grounds. Today, such a merger would likely be permitted. If Delta were to enter bankruptcy, even larger mergers would probably be feasible based on “failing firm" and "existing assets" defenses.

Aside from any antitrust law considerations, there is no way that any of the non-bankrupt major legacy airlines could merge with each other because of their huge unfunded pension liabilities. Thus, any merger of major legacy airlines will have to be like American’s acquisition of TWA’s assets. After TWA’s pension plans were terminated along with all post-retirement employee obligations, American bought TWA’s assets.

American assumed certain of TWA’s debts and TWA employees were added to the bottom of the American Airlines seniority lists. As 9-11 occurred shortly after the merger, American furloughed most former TWA employees. Today there are few former TWA pilots or flight attendants still working at American Airlines.

If an antitrust law exemption based on the "failing firm" and "existing assets" doctrines were to develop, mergers thought inconceivable a few years ago might occur. American might be able to acquire the assets of Delta or even UAL on terms similar to those used in the TWA acquisition. The cash required would be relatively small, but it would involve the assumption of significant amounts of debt. Northwest and Continental might also try to take advantage of such an antitrust law exemption “window” to attempt to acquire the assets of UAL, Delta or US Airways on similar terms.

While the words “Penn Central” may come to mind when any such mega-mergers of legacy airlines are considered, there is no doubt that consolidation is sorely needed in the industry. One wrinkle may be that the non-bankrupt legacy carriers use the prospect of such acquisitions to obtain wage concessions from their unions. Many American Airlines pilots and flight attendants still have jobs today because the TWA employees went to the bottom of the seniority lists. Probably all of the employees at any major legacy airline now on furlough could all be recalled if their airline were to acquire the assets of a bankrupt legacy carrier and the bankrupt carrier’s employees were “stapled” to the bottom of the combined entity’s seniority lists.

The acquiring legacy airline might even be able to obtain wage concessions from its unions as a quid-pro-quo for giving its employees job security (at the expense of the bankrupt airline’s employees) significant enough to allow them to compete with the low cost carriers. That, combined with the capacity reductions and creation of local monopolies that such consolidation would entail, might actually allow a legacy carrier to actually earn a profit.
Xttp://investorsresources.bravehost.com
X=h
 
Last edited:
Oops, I only opened this thread because I thought the title was "Murders & Assasinations"

reference movie "American Psycho"
 
Scary but needs to happen!!

As bad as that sounds it is true. The fact that the airlines are filling up there seats but not making any money is just sad. Everyday we watch what the fuel prices are doing and wonder if we are going to have a job tomorrow. We shouldn't be worrying about those costs, the passengers should. They are the ones that should be paying for the higher fuel prices not the airline. The fact is that there is too much competition out there and either airlines need to go away or merge. Yes more jobs will be cut but there has to be scarifices to save this dying industry. If United or US Airways were out of chap 11 now they would have not survived but yet they are allowed to stay in and continue to drag the industry as a whole down further!! Something needs to be done!! Its a reality check but true.
 
Some here imply that these would be bad for labor. Some will be greatly affected, but the alternative may be more bankruptcies and liquidation. Everyone believes there needs to be some consolidation and undoubtedly people will lose jobs. Unfortunately, this may be the best result for the long term airline industry. Just my opinion.
 
I agree, has to happen sooner or later, and better sooner, once the dust settles things may go back to normal (pay, hiring....)
 
Economics 101

This is microeconomics 101! I've been saying this all along, some has to exit the market for it to recover, no matter what the price of oil is. Airlines will never be able to charge enough for tickets because the industry is too competative. Look, from the perspective of the passenger, airline travel is a homogeneous product, and they only look at the price when purchasing a ticket. This is why we can fill our airplanes and not make a dime!

In order for the industry to recover, the industry concentration ratio must go up, then, and only then, will airlines be able to charge enough. Less competition is the only way we will recover.

When times are good you have market entry (JetBlue, AirTran), and when times are bad you have market exit (United, USAirways). This is the cycle, now let get on with it, and start the good times again!
 
Yes, but you guys are missing the point, which is the prospect of Company A saying to the employees, " give us concessions, and we'll buy Company B and staple 'em . . . . we'll get all OUR guys back and furlough their guys". . . . not too farfetched a scenario, unfortunately.

I have said many times on this very board- we need to have a guild or professional association (like the AMA) that says what the minimum pay will be in the industry. . . that will prevent this kind of whipsawing that exists and will only get worse without it.

Only when pilot costs are "off the table" can we start to regain lost ground.
 
One thing not discussed so far was that the staple job in the AA/ TWA deal was possible because they were part of two different unions. If both airlines that would want to try to merge similarly both had ALPA unions, I believe the ALPA bylaws stipulate a much more fair merging of seniority lists when two ALPA groups combine. However I could also see big business and/ or the government just ramming a staple/ mass fulough down the unions throat.
 
If two ALPA carriers merge, the ALPA merger policy comes into effect, which states that no one can gain more than what they would have had at their own company. No "windfalls". I think TWA was ALPA, and AA obviously had the APA. I also think mergers will happen.


Bye Bye--General Lee
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top