Deuce130
Durka Durka Jihad!
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2005
- Posts
- 1,237
DaveGriffin said:Magnum;
If you go outside your closed circle of zoomie, rah rah, fighter jock, AF cheerleaders, I believe you may find others of the same opinion as mine.
Including the opinion that AF CAS from the fighters ain't always as great as you seem to think it is. Things look much different from ground level than they do from 30,000 ft.
They're the ones who would know. You don't see fighter jocks reading some magazines and then telling the navy how NSWU-1 should be equipped or how to train the next generation of boat drivers. I've spent some time around operators, does that mean I'm qualified to have an opinon on them? Don't think so. Just 'cause you watched Wings one night doesn't make you an expert on combat aviation. Besides, no is going to argue that AC-130's make great CAS platforms. That's why the AF is building more. With that said, who's going to provide CAS in a high threat environment? Not the gunship. And even the A-10 is a stretch in a high threat environment. The F-16 is your best bet. Anyone can have an opinion, but somehow you seem to think yours is backed up by all this "evidence" that simply isn't true. And anyone who knows anything about military officers knows that noone would get sent to India to take a dive against foreign fighter pilots. What an insult. Stick to what you know.