pilotyip
Well-known member
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 13,629
It is going work just fine for themYou guys let me know how that works out for you... *snicker*
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is going work just fine for themYou guys let me know how that works out for you... *snicker*
There are over 20,000 regional pilots, plus many cargo, military and corporate who are ready to move on. If AA's scope reaches 88 seats and UCAL doesn't hold the line where it's at then expect less jobs on the major level. When any Career airline opens its doors expect 10,000+ qualified resumes. I don't expect to see any noticeable movement till 2017 assuming age 67 isn't passed by then.
If you define "shortage" as literally no one qualified to apply to a major, then yes you are correct that will never happen.
Most rational people define "shortage" as the landscape of pilot recruitment shifting in favor of the applicant. That, without question, is going to happen. The majors already know this, and are preparing for it.
No I disagree with you...I think most media looking for a catchy headline, Kit Darby, and airline recuiters think a shifting in favor of applicants is a "shortage." I think most rational people would say that the situation would be "less of a surplus" We are a long way from having a SHORTAGE of pilot applicants at the major airline level.
You don't need a high school diploma to work at just about any McDonalds. If for years at a certain McDonalds the economy in an area was so bad that this McDonalds started requiring all applicants to have a 4 year college degree. Then things started picking up in the economy and this McDonalds owner had to drop the requirement to an Associates Degree. Would most rational people believe the owner when they said that "there is a shortage of McDonalds applicants" because there was a shifting of requirements in favor of the McDonalds Applicants? Not likely.
I think most rational people would say that a Shortage does not happen until we see an upward shift in pay because of the supply in the market. If we start seeing companies voluntarily shifting first year pay upwards, that's when we'll know that there is truly a pilot shortage.
We (as all pilots) need to be careful how we word this because this will come back to bite us. If the public perception is that there is a SHORTAGE of pilots then that plays into the hands of the airlines because that gives them very strong arguments in congress for the removal of 65, MMPL, and relaxed cabotage rules.
Perfectly-worded, and well-said.I think most rational people would say that a Shortage does not happen until we see an upward shift in pay because of the supply in the market. If we start seeing companies voluntarily shifting first year pay upwards, that's when we'll know that there is truly a pilot shortage.
We (as all pilots) need to be careful how we word this because this will come back to bite us. If the public perception is that there is a SHORTAGE of pilots then that plays into the hands of the airlines because that gives them very strong arguments in congress for the removal of 65, MMPL, and relaxed cabotage rules.
Again, that will NOT happen at the Major Airline level. I have the retirements of every Legacy/Major carrier as well as the number of pilots at the Regional level, we've done the math, worked the flow charts out for pilots, and no matter the hiring scenario, even if airlines DON'T shrink capacity to raise prices (which they've already admitted they plan to do), in an even-numbers hiring scenario (hiring the same number as they retire), you never, ever get to the point where there aren't qualified RJ drivers with PLENTY of total time and turbine PIC meeting the minimums and ready to take the job.Given the number of pilots coming into aviation compared to the number leaving over the next 20 years, there will either be a shortage or a major shift in how many pilots are needed in the flight deck.
That's the long view though. How dare I think past 6 months from now!
Perfectly-worded, and well-said.
Again, that will NOT happen at the Major Airline level. I have the retirements of every Legacy/Major carrier as well as the number of pilots at the Regional level, we've done the math, worked the flow charts out for pilots, and no matter the hiring scenario, even if airlines DON'T shrink capacity to raise prices (which they've already admitted they plan to do), in an even-numbers hiring scenario (hiring the same number as they retire), you never, ever get to the point where there aren't qualified RJ drivers with PLENTY of total time and turbine PIC meeting the minimums and ready to take the job.
As such, you will never see a pay increase at the bottom that isn't part of normal Section 6 negotiations at a Major airline and the Majors won't have to lower their "minimum" standards. They may not get as many of their "preferred" candidates, but there's just too many RJ guys, and as those CA's get those jobs, the F/O's slide into CA positions, get their 1,000+ PIC inside of 18 months, and meet the minimums themselves.
It simply won't happen at the Majors. ALPA has done that math; I challenge anyone to prove me wrong with actual retirement data.
hiring boom, eh? A good friend recently went to a Hawaiian interview which lasted 5 days, with no hotel provided, or positive space travel... he expected to see a handful there; he was shocked to find that he was one of 40 mostly highly qualified pilots there that week, and that they'd been interviewing some 40/week for the past few months... more over, of that 40, they expect maybe 5-6 to get called back for the 2nd part of the interview where they then can weed you out with their psych tests... that's not a shortage, not even close.
When no one else is currently hiring, what do you expect? Fast forward 3 years when the floodgates will open Hal will have to spend $$$ to even get the likes of johnsonrod hired.