Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Lowecur's report card

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
"But, the disparity in pay scales between the E190 and A320 has much the same effect as the B scale".

Not sure that argument has merit, in as much, that very few companies employ a single payscale across different types. In the case of the 190 vs the A-320, the pay per number of seats is exactly the same. The higher number of seats on the 320 makes for higher pay.

Taking the above into account, the 9 driver at NWA is either overpaid or the 74 pilot underpaid, since pay scale is not linear with regards to seats.

As for the real B-scale having lowered competetive mins, I am not sure, I was not there, however, it would appear to me, that only in case there was a surplus of pilots could a company get away with it. If there was not a surplus of pilots, then why would anyone decide to work for a company that paid less. That is unless they preferred a specific carrier and were willing to accept less pay for some other tangibles, ie bases, routes, time off etc.

The mins at jetblue, as it stands right now, are not being changed. If in the future, they are unable to attract people, then they must either raise pay or lower mins.
 
Dizel8 said:
The mins at jetblue, as it stands right now, are not being changed. If in the future, they are unable to attract people, then they must either raise pay or lower mins.
I'll go with the latter - probably see lower mins because raising pay means lower corporate profits, which we all know is THE cornerstone of a capitalist society. :D

HMM
 
lowecur said:
Right you are there Sy. N1 may write a great piece for AP, but he doesn't understand CASM, RASM, and JAZM.

Here my good man, read what Jamie Baker says and plug in your own numbers.

[font=Arial, Helvetica][size=+1]JetBlue achieves ultra-competitive pilot pay on Embraer 190s
Dateline: Friday July 09, 2004

JetBlue Airways' 100-seat Embraer 190s, which begin arriving next year, "will offer better cockpit/seat economics" than larger Frontier Airlines A319s, AirTran 717s and Southwest Airlines 737s, according to JP Morgan analyst Jamie Baker.

In a report released yesterday, Baker said that three-year seniority rates for JetBlue 190 captains will be $74 per hour, or $80 when adjusted for overtime. A 12-year captain on a JetBlue 190 will earn $96 including overtime, representing "a 33%" cost-per-seat advantage versus Southwest's 137-seat aircraft when adjusted for planned pilot pay increases at Southwest. "Whereas airline pilots typically get paid more as aircraft size increases, JetBlue has established its 100-seat pay scale below that of certain 70-seat operators, an obvious competitive disadvantage for the Regional airline sector, at least initially," Baker stated. Pay rates also will pressure regional jet operators. For example, a three-year captain on a 70-seat CRJ700 flying for Comair, a Delta Air Lines subsidiary, earns $74 per hour while captains on Horizon Air CRJ700s earn $75. According to Baker, American Airlines "would require a 757…to approach JetBlue's cockpit/seat economics" based on planned third-quarter 2005 AA pay rates.--Perry Flint

[/size][/font]
Lowecur,

Thanks for giving it your best shot guessing what will happen. Maybe '05 will be better for you.

I remember reading, "SWA stock will be in the single digits." I still don't think that will happen, but the stock did stagnate in '04. I predict its upward rise in '05.

Back to the July '04 article you reference. Note it was before the paycuts at Northwest, Delta, and recent cuts proposed at USAir and UAL. Your 33% advantage won't last. Delta and Mesa worked out an EMB 170's deal to put pressure on Comair/ASA (read screw your wholly owned subs.)

SWA will not follow the airline rule of raising wages and sticking with "Max pay until the last day". They will work out a competitive advantage somehow. If I am wrong then it will be as Pete from SWA schedule planning said, "We already have too many aircraft." If SWA does it right, "We can comfortably handle the aircraft on order."

Regards,

FBJ
 
Last edited:
Dizel8 said:
Not sure that argument has merit, in as much, that very few companies employ a single payscale across different types. In the case of the 190 vs the A-320, the pay per number of seats is exactly the same. The higher number of seats on the 320 makes for higher pay.
The B scale analogy was used for affect. Per seat rate is around $1.16 or the 190, and $1.13 for the 320 for 3 year CA/FO. At SWA, the seat rate is $1.85 for the 737NG for the same 3 year CA/FO. The difference is around 60% between the two carriers, so my 40% was low.

The same overall question will be asked to the same pilot groups as their Section 6's come due. "We need to have between 10-15% profit margins, and are you willing to help us maintain this during your next TA?" How each pilot group answers that question, will determine if their respective models are working.
 
We can get caught up in these per seat rates, but debt and worker expectations are bigger issues.

Setting the bar and slowly raising it over the years keeps the workers happy. Stagnating or cutting it, results in discontent. Happy workers make the passenger less iratated.
 
FlyBoeingJets said:
Lowecur,

Thanks for giving it your best shot guessing what will happen. Maybe '05 will be better for you. Low blow there FBJ.

I remember reading, "SWA stock will be in the single digits." Did I say that? :) I still don't think that will happen, but the stock did stagnate in '04. I predict its upward rise in '05. I think you are probably right.

Back to the July '04 article you reference. Note it was before the paycuts at Northwest, Delta, and recent cuts proposed at USAir and UAL. Your 33% advantage won't last. I believe the article was referring the F9, FL, and WN. I don't see any of them matching Jetblue's cost per seat in the near future. Delta and Mesa worked out an EMB 170's deal to put pressure on Comair/ASA (read screw your wholly owned subs.) I wasn't aware that Mesa was a sub of DL. I assume you mean Republic. Yes, seat cost advantage and ergomomics will be negated at this level and for these carriers. Overall CASM's will remain high until the 100 seater scope is approved, the Pension issue is dealt with, and a reduction in fleet types is accomplished (4 is what Grinstein is looking at). Then they all will need to recoup brand loyalty. This could be their biggest hurdle.

SWA will not follow the airline rule of raising wages and sticking with "Max pay until the last day". They will work out a competitive advantage somehow. If I am wrong then it will be as Pete from SWA schedule planning said, "We already have too many aircraft." If SWA does it right, "We can comfortably handle the aircraft on order."

Regards,

FBJ
Here's an article in the Sun-Sentinel this morning questioning whether DL should even own a regional:

The glitch that stole Christmas lingers

By John Nolan
The Associated Press

January 1, 2005

HEBRON, Ky. · Even after suffering an embarrassing and costly computer failure on Christmas that stranded thousands of fliers, regional carrier Comair remains an important asset for Delta Air Lines, feeding it passengers from small airports nationwide.

Analysts are divided, however, on whether and how much Comair's value has depreciated since the fiasco, which could leave a lasting stain on the carrier's image and turn potential customers away.

And the emergence of independent, low-cost regional carriers including SkyWest, American Eagle, Chautauqua and Mesa has large airlines like Delta rethinking whether they really need to own small carriers like Comair, a wholly owned Delta subsidiary. Airlines are already under competitive pressure to keep fares steady and are coping with rising fuel costs.

"The relationships of all major carriers with their partners, whether they're wholly owned or not, is clearly in a state of flux," Doug Abbey, a partner with The Velocity Group, an aviation consulting firm in Washington, D.C., said Friday. "This is still a cost-driven industry."

Delta doesn't reveal how much profit Comair brings to the Delta system. But former Delta Chief Executive Leo Mullin said several years ago that collective revenue from Comair and other Delta Connection carriers that coordinate schedules with Delta was in the billions of dollars annually, Abbey said.

While Delta owns two of its regional carriers -- Comair and Atlantic Southeast -- United Airlines doesn't own any of its regional partners, including SkyWest, Republic Airlines and Air Wisconsin.

"There's a hybrid relationship in the industry," said Debby McElroy, president of the Regional Airline Association, a trade organization. "The major carriers are looking at what is the appropriate relationship -- whether that be ownership or a marketing agreement -- given the environment in today's market."

Delta and Comair spokesmen wouldn't comment on Delta's long-term plans for Comair, or whether the Christmas Day problems would affect those plans. But, Delta CEO Gerald Grinstein said last month that Delta would not necessarily need to own Comair or Atlantic Southeast to enjoy the benefits of receiving passengers from them.

Comair now faces a public relations problem because of its computer failure, said Richard Gritta, a University of Portland (Ore.) professor of finance and transportation.

"It looks foolish, coming over the Christmas break," Gritta said of Comair's one-day shutdown. "The fact that it happens right at Christmas and vacations are ruined … How do you replace somebody's ruined Christmas? At least US Airways got most of their passengers, minus the luggage to their destinations"

"It's a serious PR blow. And any blow like that is going to affect the market value," Gritta said.

The more-than-10-year-old computer system Comair uses to schedule flight crews collapsed on Christmas Eve, prompting Comair to scrap all its Christmas Day flights. Comair resumed flying a partial schedule the next day and was back on Wednesday to a normal schedule of 1,160 daily flights to 119 cities.

The airline carries about 30,000 passengers daily in the United States, mostly east of the Mississippi River, and to Canada and the Bahamas.

The carrier's management said it already had planned to replace its old computer system within the next few months.

Comair is focusing on reliably and safely serving its passengers and doesn't believe the Christmas fiasco will be the standard for judging the airline, company spokesman Nick Miller said.
 
Last edited:
"but there is a core of pilots that has become used to the big raises from the last TA and will expect the same this time around."

LowerIQ did you learn nothing from Dan Rather. You get another F for your report card . Facts, we want facts not your spin..
 
80drvr said:
While you won't hear much love for the B scale, it did lead to a whole lot of folks being hired in the 80's with significantly less that what you'd consider competitive qualifications today.
80drvr,

Interesting statistic but do you have any tangible proof of that or is it just your speculation or what you think? I guess what I am wondering is what were the qualifications then and the qualifications now that are competitive. I am going to retire very soon after 33 years and I personally have not seen any difference in the folks being hired from the late 60's until now that I have flown with. Oh, agree 100% about the lack of love for the Bscale. Nothing but fear, cowardice, and greed from those that agreed to sign the contract ushering it in.
 
N1atEcon said:
"but there is a core of pilots that has become used to the big raises from the last TA and will expect the same this time around."

LowerIQ did you learn nothing from Dan Rather. You get another F for your report card . Facts, we want facts not your spin..
I'm no Dan Rather, and you're no Karl Rove. I'm a prognosticator analcyst.:) We shall see how cooperative all the pilots are at the section 6. I have a feeling it's not going to be like years past, but what do I know.;)

For the record, a little inside information.:rolleyes: Those documents that were faxed from TX, were fed to Terry McAuliffe & the TX democrats by none other than Karl Rove and Co. He set them up like the bunch of turkeys they are.
 
Last edited:
"We shall see how cooperative all the pilots are at the section 6."

I think you are going to see a large % of the pilots very happy to see some work rules (reserves) ironed out, medical ect. No one here is looking to strangle the "goose" if you know what I mean. Do not expect to see much money. Maybe another profitability based raise or cost of living increase. I am curious to meet this "core of pilots" you speak of. I have not met this group.I guess i must hang out and fly with the outer group. It is kind of funny how you know of this bunch yet I work here and i don't. Hmmmmm, sounds kinda made up again. Once again you get an "F" for making things up Lower IQ...
 
Lowecur,

Your lack of understanding of airline labor never fails to amaze me. Which employee group at any airline is always the easiest to deal with? Which group is typically smart enough to look at the big picture and give a little back when needed?

You remind me of the straight A math student I grew up with. She could answer any math problem you set in front of her... but in the end, she couldn't balance a check book by herself. No real world understanding!!!!
 
J32driver said:
Lowecur,

Your lack of understanding of airline labor never fails to amaze me. Which employee group at any airline is always the easiest to deal with? The Sky Caps? Which group is typically smart enough to look at the big picture and give a little on their back when needed? The FA's?

You remind me of the straight A math student I grew up with. She could answer any math problem you set in front of her... but in the end, she couldn't balance a check book by herself. Did you marry her? No real world understanding!!!!
You just can't find good help when you need it.
 
Last edited:
JetBlue captains were making $80/hour in late 2001. As the company made money, they were given a raise to $115/hour. The E-190 rates are initial rates too. If the plane and strategy are successful, then the E-190 rates will increase. It's much easier to start with a somewhat acceptable pay rate and increase when feasible. Much harder to find out the plane's numbers aren't good and have to decrease the pay rate...
 
lowecur

poses as an airline analyst on this board at night

eats his captain crunch for breakfast every morning

star pupil at his middle school

this aspiring wall street guru is a bright star in a long line of 12-year old pizza faced wankers in his neighborhood
 

Latest resources

Back
Top