Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It doesn’t really make any difference at all. There are those who will say that “high-wing” trainers such as the Cessna 152 or 172 are easier to fly and are more stable. Others will say that the “low-wing” aircraft such as the Pipers are better. The truth is that either type is just fine. Each type has its particular “pros” and “cons”. There might be some argument for using a high-wing trainer if someday you dream of owning a Cessna 210 or a low-wing trainer if someday you plan on buying a Bonanza or other high performance low-wing aircraft. However, when all is said and done it doesn’t really matter. You can safely base your decision on what “strikes your fancy” and where you can make the best deal. What does matter is who your CFI is. Take some time and find a good one.cforst513 said:is there an advantage in learning how to fly in low-wing aircraft vs. high-wing (or vice versa)? maybe tomahawks and archers vs. 152's and 172's. what do you guys prefer, or what did you learn on?
rumpletumbler said:We rent the Alarus for $78 an hour. I'll bet it is far better equipped and much newer than your 152 as well.
http://www.newplane.com/amd_files/Alarus-2005-13Ss.jpg
Frmr Avro Drvr said:Just be careful when you step on the step to get on the wing or the tail will be sitting on the ground. Also be careful not to stick your hand through the skin.
It flew all right but seemed cheaply made. That was in 2000. I don't know if they are any better now.
rumpletumbler said:Well the skin is aluminum so I'm not sure what you mean. Also if a fat person gets on the step and doesn't transfer their weight to the wing pretty quick, yes it will sit on the tail.
If you want to build time cheaply, consider a vintage taildragger. They're reasonably affordable to buy and cheap to operate. They'll teach you what your feet are for and make you an argueably better pilot. Finally, one nice thing about them it that they tend to appreciate. Back when I was working on building time, I bought a Luscombe 8-F and flew it for a couple of years and 300 or 400 hours. When I sold it, it had appreciated enough to cover my operating costs. You can do the same thing if your careful.Doug said:...but I am leaning toward purchasing a 152 to build time when I get my ticket.
Doug said:Now years later, I am basically dreaming the same dream, just with a plane instead of a car...