Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Looming Pilot Shortage

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
and "good employers" is a moving target, 2 years ago NJ was having trouble filling classes, now the view of what is a good employer has changed. And who is to define good employer, when I was unemployed USA Jet looked like a great palce to work, only until I could get a better job, funny thing happened on the way to the better job, I could not find one.
 
Now there's the conundrum. You indicate you couldn't find anything better than USA Jet, yet USA jet has a hard time finding people, and you've repeatedly stated that you had to keep lowering your minimums to get pilots to come work for you.

This doesn't indicate USA Jet was a good employer. In fact, based on your own testimony, just the opposite. With standards being repeatedly lowered, you show that you found it difficult to get pilots at any price, even offering what you thought was a good wage (it wasn't).

Conversely, you felt like it was the best option for you? Or you simply felt comfortable there? Nothing wrong with that. One man's ceiling is another man's floor, and what works for one is just not on for another. However, to suggest that there's some mythical shortage of pilots, simply because your firm couldn't bring them on board with any experience, even by raising the wages, only verifies the obvious; it's not a pilot shortage, but a matter of experienced pilots finding something better.

So far as Netjets, many pilots have found them more than palatable. Two years ago job prospects abounded, and jobs were aplenty, with pilots continuing to flock to Netjets...that their expansion and success meant they couldn't hire enough didn't mean there weren't enough pilots...pilots were hiring everywhere and it was a pilot's market. Lots of jobs. No shortage of pilots. Netjets biggest problem hasn't been that they couldn't get pilots, it's been that they simply can't train them fast enough. I know other firms in the same boat. Netjets, in fact, has been in high demand among pilot applicants for a number of years now, and in particular, since their last contract.

I really don't know many who wouldn't consider Netjets a desireable employer, the schedule(s) desireable schedules, the aircraft desireable aircraft, the experience desireable experience, the pay acceptable or even desireable pay...it's a good job. It was a good job two years ago, too.

You're not seriously suggesting that "on the way to finding a better job" that USA Jet proved the best there was to be found, are you? Again, nothing wrong with being happy where you are, but few, if any, would give any credence to the notion that USA Jet ever offered, or now offers, the best there is to be found.
 
The best job I could find

You're not seriously suggesting that "on the way to finding a better job" that USA Jet proved the best there was to be found, are you? Again, nothing wrong with being happy where you are, but few, if any, would give any credence to the notion that USA Jet ever offered, or now offers, the best there is to be found.
That is exactly what I am saying as a man approaching his 60th B'day, I could not find a job that paid more, gave me more personal freedom, or sense of purpose than my job at USA Jet. Therefore it was the best job I could find. So again the defintion of a good employer is in the eyes of the beholder.
 
Last edited:
Last edited by pilotyip : Today at 13:23. Reason: sppling of course I am an airline pilto with a college degree

Well, here we go again. Once more, you keep spouting this tripe about degrees and employment. You've been on and on about the pilot shortage that doesn't exist, and even as your own company, the same one that's been progressively lowering it's standards, has shut out many of it's employees and ditched an entire fleet, you still assert that such a shortage exists...when clearly it does not and never has.

This stance of itself, while incorrect and destructive to whatever credibility you might hope to maintain, is fairly innocuous. Your agenda, pushed for years on end now, to promote lack of education is not nearly so innocent.

Your poor advice to forgo a degree is foolishness at best. While you spout off about how a lack of degree never hurt you...you always conveniently leave out that you hold a masters degree...

Now, as pilots realize that there wasn't a forthcoming shortage (the one you've been actively preaching is coming, is here, and can only get greater...that one), when pilots can use all the credentials in their favor possible for the limited hiring that will go on...any dumb enough to listen to your advice and counsel are only all the more handicapped. None the less, you continue to pound out the bad word.

What this has done for you in the past, and continues to do for you now, is brand you as the guy who hands out bad advice...not just bad, but 180 degrees out of sync. Perhaps the best way to tackle listening to the counsel you dole out is to know in advance that if one does exactly the opposite...one is at a minimum better off than paying attention to or follwing anything you have to say.

You still believe there is a pilot shortage, then?
 
Lets disagree

There certainly was a shortage last year and any pilot who could fog a mirror could get a job, my prediction of that was right on. In the last 2-yr. a number of USA Jet pilots were hired at NJ and SWA without degrees based upon their resumes, skills, and content of their character. I am management the degree might make a difference there, it also certainly helped with promotion in the Navy. Let’s just be gentlemen and agree to disagreed. I did not know people read my tag lines. BTW my grandson told me today after flying over to KOSH in the C-47 with me, that he did not want to go to college but wanted to go to a good trade school.
 
Last edited:
BTW my grandson told me today after flying over to KOSH in the C-47 with me, that he did not want to go to college but wanted to go to a good trade school.

You must be so proud. Congratulations. The poison takes another victim...

There certainly was a shortage last year and any pilot who could fog a mirror could get a job, my prediction of that was right on.

There was no "pilot shortage." There was the usual cyclical prosperity in the industry, which occurs nearly like clockwork every five years. It's a ten year cycle, with five years being a high, and five a low. There's no need to "predict" anything, and even a broken watch is correct twice a day. However, there was no shortage. Greater opportunities, as we see every time the cycle goes around, but no shortage.

Again, simply because USA jet had to keep lowering it's standards doesn't imply a shortage. It's not a matter of too few pilots. Just too few good employers.

You've been "predicting" a looming pilot shortage througout this thread...but you're clearly incorrect. Now your backpeddling effort is to suggest that you correctly "predicted" it two years ago...which while incorrect, doesn't change the fact that you're wrong here, too.

There is no pilot shortage. There has been no pilot shortage. For the foreseeable future, there will be no pilot shortage.

The legion of unemployed pilots presently seeking work certainly won't stand as a very good testament to your upcoming predictions now, will they?
 
lets just be gentelmen

You must be so proud. Congratulations. The poison takes another victim..
Lets just agree to disagree
 
Trade school is Navy talk for the Academy, there is where he wants to go and I could not be prouder. He has also told if he doesn't get in there he will only go to college if someone else pays for it. His way of accepting a Navy ROTC scholarship.

Pilotyip sent this by PM, but it deserves a public posting. With this explaination, he does indeed have reason to be proud, with respect to his decision to serve.

I can't agree with someone electing only to gain an education if they don't have to pay for it, but that's his problem.

One who is willing and able to attend any of the academies and to serve their country deserves not only a pat on the back, but a standing ovation...even if everyone else foots the bill.
 
Oh No

Pilotyip sent this by PM, but it deserves a public posting. With this explaination, he does indeed have reason to be proud, with respect to his decision to serve.

I can't agree with someone electing only to gain an education if they don't have to pay for it, but that's his problem.

One who is willing and able to attend any of the academies and to serve their country deserves not only a pat on the back, but a standing ovation...even if everyone else foots the bill.
My anti-college reputation is being ruined
 

Latest resources

Back
Top