Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

logging right seat in a twin cessna?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
imacdog said:
Cargo-only does not require a second pilot or autopilot. That is how operators are flying 1900s and Metros single pilot with no autopilot.

Reference?

I can only find 135.101 and 135.105. and no mention of cargo is in there.

I've heard about an exception, however. Just wondering if its true and where the loophole is that allows it. Flying a 1900 single pilot with no autopilot seems a bit, um, much.

~wheelsup
 
135.101 says it all. No passengers, no requirement for a copilot. I don't have any 1900 time but from what I hear it is better than flying a Metro solo.
 
Rez O. Lewshun said:
Perhaps if the applicant tried to pass off 135 SIC as smoething more....like PIC......

I logged lots of time like this...

2.0 flight time CE-310.
I flew 1.0 as PIC.
Other pilot flew 1.0 as PIC.
But I logged 2.0 in the multi column.

So hot to get that multi time, I justifed shady logging...

I went back and did a massvie audit. Wish I did it right the first time....

If you flew 2.0 hours in an airplane...1.0 as PIC and 1.0 as SIC then you do have 2.0 loggable multi hours. I guess I'm not following.


I just re-read your post...was it pt 135 PIC that you were logging when you weren't qualified for it?
 
wheelsup said:
Reference?

I can only find 135.101 and 135.105. and no mention of cargo is in there.
Don't need another reference. If the aircraft is certificated for single pilot operations, then you need a rule that =does= day you need an SIC in order to log the time.

Single pilot A/C + No rule requiring an SIC = no logging SIC time.

The only reason I asked was that AvBug didn't differentiate. I suspect that this was an oversight, but just wanted to make sure.
 
Is anyone going to answer Immelman's question? I'm just curious what a first officer really does. If I'm going to be one some day, it would be a good heads-up. I am currently right seat in a B200, flying and doing my share. I'm sure there has to be a lot more work to it than what I do. For now this is the only way I can get some good multi time here in BFE Minnesota.

Waiting for a reply
 
F16fixer said:
Is anyone going to answer Immelman's question? I'm just curious what a first officer really does. If I'm going to be one some day, it would be a good heads-up. I am currently right seat in a B200, flying and doing my share. I'm sure there has to be a lot more work to it than what I do. For now this is the only way I can get some good multi time here in BFE Minnesota.

Waiting for a reply

A first officers job is to do the paperwork, the walkaround, get me a couple bottles of water, and take the fat chick at the bar.
 
midlifeflyer said:
Don't need another reference. If the aircraft is certificated for single pilot operations, then you need a rule that =does= day you need an SIC in order to log the time.

Single pilot A/C + No rule requiring an SIC = no logging SIC time.

That wasn't the question - I just wanted to know where it said cargo operators need no autopilot. Me thinks flying single pilot with no autopilot in a 1900/Merlin is crazy nuts and would significantly shorten any pilots life span - but darn good experience none-the-less.

~wheelsup
 
Log what you want. Just remember that before you interview, make sure you have a legitimate explanation on how you got the time. Nothing like being at an interview and getting backed into a corner because of time you can't explain.
 
midlifeflyer said:
Don't need another reference. If the aircraft is certificated for single pilot operations, then you need a rule that =does= day you need an SIC in order to log the time.

FAR 135 (if you're properly trained and have a FAA SIC checkride) is the rule that allows the logging of SIC time in otherwise single pilot a/c.
 
Immelman said:
Following this logic, I a am wondering how 'lame' is it to log time as SIC in a turbojet whose type requires two pilots?... Especially considering that, depending on equiptment, the turbojet may be 'easier' to operate than a 'Ho or Cessna 4xx?
The type certificate is key to your question. It's illegal to operate most turbojets single pilot. No one is going to argue logging SIC in a jet that has a "minimum crew requirement" of 2 pilots in the AFM. The right seat of a turbojet can be a very busy place and a good SIC is invaluable.

When you're low time and scraping for every hour, it gets tempting to start logging some of the "questionable" time. A little prudence now can save a lot of explaining later.
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top