Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Logging 2nd in command as safety pilot

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Flame away, but if "Doc" says to log it SIC, then he's an idiot. I get my information clarified not only from the FARs, but from the Feds as well. I use this board and the internet only as a supplementary tool for learning, and I make sure that what I learn is backed up. Two officials from the ATL FSDO have confirmed that PIC can and is logged by the safety pilot and the pilot under the hood.
 
Two officials from the ATL FSDO have confirmed that PIC can and is logged by the safety pilot and the pilot under the hood.

I'm looking at my FAR's Explained book by Kent S. Jackson and for 61.51, under FAA Chief Counsel Opinions( note it says opinions ) it says that" if the pilots agree prior to initiating the flight that the safety pilot will be the PIC responsible for the operation and safety of the aircraft during the flight, then the safety pilot may log all of the flight time as PIC time in accordance with FAR 1.1 and the pilot under the hood may log, concurrently, all of the flight time during which he is the sole manipulator of the controls as PIC time in accordance with 61.51."

So Erik, your FSDO guys are right only if you agree to let the safety pilot be the acting PIC. At least that's how I read it.

I think you're being a little swift in your judgement of "Doc". He most certainly is not an idiot. He has a massive knowledge of the regualtions and he is always more than happy to help anyone that might have a question. He has a disclaimer on his site that explains that he is not a lawyer and that his interpretations are just that, his interpretations . They don't hold water more than anybody elses, including the FSDO's! Deftone is right, if they aint Legal Council, then you're just guessing like the rest of us:D
 
read the book and think for yourself.
That's my whole point, is that I am reading it and thinking for myself. Much of the stuff that I read on this board I agree with, but will play devil's advocate with another view for the sake of learning. If one can make points on a subject from any angle, it is clear that he knows it, and that is what I strive for, is more aviation knowledge. I am not trying to insult doc. I know that I am pretty green and that someone of his caliber has a lotof knowledge and wisdom. However, I don't believe you have to be a deity to interpret a couple of paragraphs. Once again, no offense to doc, but everything that I have learned on this, and everyone I ask, goes against what he says on this subject. I'm pretty sure there is not supposed to be room for so much gray area. Who has the final say, anyway. If it lies in the PIC, then I don't see why we shoot down other pilots acting in such a manner and rely on some other source. Help me with this.
 
I can't believe this is STILL an issue

Whether two pilots can log simultaneous time in a single pilot aircraft, when the issue is a safety pilot's time, has absolutely nothing to do with the type certification of the aircraft. It has everything to do with 61.51(e)(1)(iii). 61.51, the ONLY reg which controls logging, specifically states that a pilot CAN log PIC time when ACTING as PIC for a flight "under the regulations under which the flight is conducted". The complete text is copied below. The regulation that makes this a two pilot requirement is 91.109 which requires a safety pilot for simulated instrument flight. See 91.109(b)(1), again copied below for reference.

Note that for the safety pilot to log PIC time, he must be ACTING as PIC, which means he must be qualified to do so. That includes currency and endorsements issues as well as being rated in the aircraft. If he is not qualified to act as PIC, or simply does not wish to, then he can still log SIC time, again under the provisions of 61.51(e)(1)(iii).

Doc most certainly does support this position, as does the AFS-640 board. Copies of opinions from each are also listed below.

----------------------------
61.51 Pilot logbooks.
(e) Logging pilot-in-command flight time. (1) A recreational, private, or commercial pilot may log pilot-in- command time only for that flight time during which that person --

(i) Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated;

(ii) Is the sole occupant of the aircraft; or

(iii) Except for a recreational pilot, is acting as pilot in command of an aircraft on which more than one pilot is required under the type certification of the aircraft or the regulations under which the flight is conducted.

--------------------------
91.109 Flight instruction; Simulated instrument flight and certain flight tests.
(b) No person may operate a civil aircraft in simulated instrument flight unless --

(1) The other control seat is occupied by a safety pilot who possesses at least a private pilot certificate with category and class ratings appropriate to the aircraft being flown.


---------------------------
Doc's opinion from Doc's FAR Pages. (I picked one. He has written on this subject, confirming the above, NUMEROUS times.)

"Since FAR 91.109(b) requires a safety pilot when flying under simulated instrument conditions, the operation now requires two pilots. Therefore, right seat (PIC and safety pilot) may log PIC time under FAR 61.51(e)(1)(iii).

[Edited for non relevance.] However, as soon as the foggles come off, right seat (PIC) time-logging privileges grind to a sudden halt because no provisions in FAR 61.51 allow him to log time.

FYI: If left seat had remained PIC [ again edited due to non relevance] then right seat (safety pilot) would only have been able to log SIC time. [Remainder edited due to non-relevance.]

I hope this helps!

Regards,

Doc"

--------------------------
And finally, the AFS-640 board's opinion on the subject.

QUESTION: In the December 1997 edition of "AOPA PILOT," specifically page 22, "AOPA ACCESS," the question was asked: "If I am flying as a safety pilot, can I log that time as pilot in command?" AOPA's answer is: "Yes. There had been talk during the rewrite process of changing this to specify only second-in-command time, but the final rule left logable safety pilot
PIC time intact. Requirements remain being rated in category and class. You are allowed to log safety pilot PIC time because your eyes are required for aircraft safety and therefore you become
a required crew member. The pilot under the hood can also log PIC time as 'sole' manipulator of the controls." §61.51(f)(2) seems pretty clear about safety pilots logging SIC rather than PIC time. What does AOPA know that we don't???

ANSWER: Yes, the time can be logged as PIC. Reference §61.51(e)(1)(ii): The safety pilot, who meets the qualifications set forth in §91.109(b) may log it as PIC time because §61.51(e)(1)(ii) states, in pertinent part, ". . . the regulations under which the flight is conducted. Note, we say "may" but he "may" prefer to log it as SIC time. Your understanding is probably based on the preamble discussion on page 16250, middle column, of the Federal Register (62 FR 16250; April 4, 1997). We would highly recommend that you also read the preamble discussion on page 16250, first column, of the Federal Register (62 FR 16250; April 4, 1997).
Reference §61.51(e)(1)(i): The other pilot manipulating the controls, and who meets the qualifications set forth in §91.109(a)(2) and (b)(3)(ii) may log it as PIC time because §61.51(e)(1)(i) states, in pertinent part, "Is the sole manipulator of the controls of an aircraft for which the pilot is rated;"
{q&a-95}

QUESTION: Is it true that a qualified pilot can log pilot-in-command time for all flight time during which he acts as a required safety pilot per 14 CFR §91.109?

ANSWER: Yes, the safety pilot can log the time as PIC time in accordance with §61.51(e)(ii) which states ". . . regulations under which the flight is conducted."

---------------------------
So there you have it.

Whether it's a good idea to have a lot of safety pilot time in your logbook is another issue. Whether this type of flight time is the equivalent to single pilot IFR flight time is also debatable. If you are a person who builds a lot of time flying safety pilot you probably answer "yes" to both of these issues. Personally, I think it's of marginal benefit, certainly not good to have a lot of it, and is not even a close second to being the PF. However, the regs say you can log it, and that's the issue in this thread. Legally, you CAN log it.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for all the feedback. I was surprised to learn through this thread that I can actually log the safety pilot time as PIC raher than SIC. I would obviously log it PIC because it does not stand out as much as SIC. I think the regs 91.109(b1) & 61.51(E)(1,iii) are pretty clear that a safety pilot can log PIC in an aircraft that only requires one pilot, but, I decided to run it by an old FAA check airman that I know and see what he had to say about it. He was very familiar with 61.51(E)(1, iii) and 91.109(b1) and he said it's a very controversial subject. He said he understands how one could believe from what is written in those regs that PIC is loggable as a safety pilot... but he said the FAA does not agree. He said he knows that even some people in the FAA (who havent been around the block as many times as he has) will tell you it's OK, but if it ever goes to court, and he has read about such cases, then the FAA will say it is not loggable as PIC, and in fact the only person who can legally log PIC as a safety pilot in an aircraft requiring only one pilot is a flight instructor. So... let me fill you in on my situation. I have 210 hours in a C-172. I will have my comercial and CFI by 260 hours which is what I had budgeted for. Unfortunately, the State of Hawaii, which I just moved to, has a problem with hiring CFI's with less than 350. The problem is the insurance companies will not insure CFI's with less than 350 hours in Hawaii. So I need about 100 more hours than I had bugeted for which is why I was wondering about logging SIC time. The PIC sounds even better but now I'm not sure. Have any of you guys logged PIC as a safety pilot in an aircraft requiring only one pilot? I'm not talking about a huge amount of time either... probably less than 100 hours... just enough to bridge the gap and then allow me to then build time as a CFI.
 
I don't really ever intend to fly for a living, so my logbook is based more on what is legal than how an airline will look at it. In any case, you asked if anyone has logged PIC as safety pilot. I have probably 15 hours of time in the PIC column where I was a safety pilot. I don't do this often and I don't think of it as a way of building time, but I do act as a safety pilot every once in a while and when I do I log it as PIC.

How does this affect YOU? PIC time logged as a safety pilot meets legal requirements for logging the time and would satisfy your insurance requirements. I don't agree with your "old check airman" that this is controversial. 61.51 and 91.109 are NOT cryptic. Whether your guy LIKES it or not isn't relevant, it IS legal.

You'll have to decide for yourself if you want to rack up 100 hours that way.
 
In any case, you asked if anyone has logged PIC as safety pilot. I have probably 15 hours of time in the PIC column where I was a safety pilot.

I have also. More than that. A friend and I fly at least once a month to maintain some semblance of instrument proficiency (very little flyable IMC around here - either cumulonimbus or cumulogranite is the general rule). Our rule is, He who can see out the window is PIC, unless he can't act as PIC (like he's not night current). And when we act as PIC in these circumstances, we log it.

Neither of us have bothered logging SIC. We haven't found a reason for collecting that time.


I don't agree with your "old check airman" that this is controversial.

I don't agree either, unless, of course, one considers
things that have been settled for 10 years "controversial."
 
>>I decided to run it by an old FAA check airman that I know and see what he had to say about it. He was very familiar with 61.51(E)(1, iii) and 91.109(b1) and he said it's a very controversial subject. He said he understands how one could believe from what is written in those regs that PIC is loggable as a safety pilot... but he said the FAA does not agree.<<

Your check airman friend may be a nice guy, but he's flat out wrong on this subject if that is his opinion. I've already posted the regs that allow it, along with the FAA's WRITTEN opinion on the subject. It matters not what pilots think, and it matters not what a local FSDO thinks. The FAA, in thier own AFS-640/840 FAQ board have posted what THEY think. How much more do you need? Log it or don't, but it's perfectly legal despite what your buddy thinks.
 
The FAA, in thier own AFS-640/840 FAQ board have posted what THEY think.
Although the FAQ is not regulatory and Lunch has had to have been corrected from time to time. (Although I doubt if anyone would get in trouble by relying on the FAQ)

Kansas - world's largest airport
I though it was the world largest emergency landing field. :D
 
lol...this is one of those threads that just never seems to die.

All that really matters is how employers look at the time. The regs seem to indicate that it's technically legal to log saftey pilot time as PIC. Fine, but that PIC I'm logging is completely worthless if my future employer won't honor it.
 
All that really matters is how employers look at the time.

And that's really the bottom line. Not necessarily whether your prospective employer cares or not, but what you are using the time for.

The FAR only requires that you log the time that you need to show currency or the satisfaction of requirements for a certificate or rating. Beyond that, it's what other purposes that you want to use the time for.

For example, are you a private pilot working on the commercial? Acting as PIC/Safety Pilot for a friend may help you reach that 100 hours of logged PIC time and maybe even that 50 hours of logged 50+NM cross-country time. (Yup, you get to log cross-country without ever touching the controls or performing a landing — crap, I can just smell another argument brewing!)

I've known pilots who, in order to keep various requirements straight have multiple columns in their logbook to reflect different timekeeping requirements.

Separate PIC columns for Sole Manipulator, Safety Pilot PIC, Acting+Logging, and Acting-but-not-logable.

A Column for 50+ NM cross-countries (countable for most certificates and ratings) and separate columns for all cross-country time (any flight involving a landing at another airport that you didn't blunder over to by accident) and 50+ NM cross-countries without a landing (countable for ATP requirements)

Columns for high performance and complex (some insurance companies like to know this)

WHEW!!
Makes you appreciate a good computer logbook!
 
midlifeflyer said:
For example, are you a private pilot working on the commercial? Acting as PIC/Safety Pilot for a friend may help you reach that 100 hours of logged PIC time and maybe even that 50 hours of logged 50+NM cross-country time. (Yup, you get to log cross-country without ever touching the controls or performing a landing — crap, I can just smell another argument brewing!)

Yep, you're just asking for it! I'm just gonna' sit back and enjoy the fight for a while. :D
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom