Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Let's use 400K piano pushers as an example.

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
And as if anyone needs more proof...

Let's not forget SWAPAs rally at HQ in Dallas supporting management as they were actively screwing over AirTran pilots.

To say SWAPA played no part is totally disingenuous at best and and more like an outright lie.

Two things:

1. I'm SWA and I don't feel as if I won anything with this acquis.....errrr merger

2. I was at that rally and it was NOT to support management. It was to support our union leadership who were meeting with management at the time. You see, we as line pilots were not happy with how the process was going. Too bad union leadership and the Comm Chair twisted the real reason we all stood in 100+ degrees with their Dallas Morning News sound bite.
 
Every one I've talked to wishes that we hadn't bought AirTran in the first place, but rather used those billions of dollars to grow our company organically.

Bubba

Where do you come up with this drivel? SWA paid 1.4 billion for Airtran. 750 mil in cash, the rest in SWA stock. Airtran had 500 mil in the bank so net outlay was around 250 mil. GK told you why-gates, routes,planes, LGA and DCA slots, and all the ATL gates. Far cheaper to acquire than "grow organically" and he says SWA will reap 400 million in synergies this year.
You're a stockholder, go to the shareholders meeting a table a proposal to replace him for his incompetence.
 
Here ya go, I fixed it for you...

2. I was at that rally and it was NOT to support management. It was to support our union leadership who were meeting with management at the time to discuss the next step in their combined effort to further screw over the AirTran pilots
 
Last edited:
Bubba, your management did not care where we fell on the list, but SWAPA did. SWAPA went to mgmt for help that's why we were threatened. An arbitrated list would have looked alot different and everybody knows it. No merger outside of the AA/TWA and SWA/AT deal put 20 year captains in the right seat, no arbitrator would have let that happen to a company that was not in bankruptcy.

Where the hell do you get this stuff?! Management most certainly DID care how the list was made. They made it. I suppose they knew that two groups would have a hard time seeing each other's side, and the list was what THEY thought was fair. They did so because they wanted a quick, NON-arbitrated agreement for the pilots. They also made that plainly clear at the outset. They specifically did not want years of infighting like the AWA/USAir debacle. SWAPA did not go to management for help and to get you "threatened." That part happened solely because your MEC refused to put forth the agreement for a vote--an agreement that management created and thought was extraordinarily generous.

Bubba
 
Bubba, your management did not care where we fell on the list, but SWAPA did. SWAPA went to mgmt for help that's why we were threatened. An arbitrated list would have looked alot different and everybody knows it. No merger outside of the AA/TWA and SWA/AT deal put 20 year captains in the right seat, no arbitrator would have let that happen to a company that was not in bankruptcy.

As far as an arbitrated list goes, you're absolutely correct--no one knows how it would have looked. There are a lot of people on this side who think they would have gotten a better list if there had been an arbitration.

And your "20-year captain in the right seat" remark is a red herring (not that you even had any at the time). Your senior guys will indeed be Southwest captains, just not until the merger is complete. I personally don't agree with this part of the deal--I think if they're senior enough on the overall list to be a captain, than they should be--but I like the fact that there's no fences, carve-outs, etc. On Jan 1 2015, it's whatever your seniority can hold.

It's pretty clear that you're going to be pissed regardless, and no amount of explanation is going to get you or Frog off your self-serving assertion that SWAPA personally screwed you out of spite.

Bubba
 
The next generation will cut the guys throat next to him if it will gain him one seniority number. I promise you, and the guys in the union will use you dues like their own personal steak and wine account while you are working Christmas Eve on a min guarantee month and they are getting 90+ for "union work at home". Take off the rose colored glasses and look at what you are dealing with.
Animal Farm anyone? If you like to fly this is still an OK job that puts you in the upper 10% of all wage earners in the US
 
BS.

If management truly thought that their proposal was fair, it wouldn't have included threats and ultimatums. By playing in the gutter, they admitted that their proposal was not fair or equitable. I wonder why that was? Clearly, SWAPA had a hand in this. A 3 year old could understand that. SWAPA can lick my balls.

I'll raise your BS with a double BS.

Your statement doesn't even make any sense. Of course they thought it was "fair." The pressure to put the second agreement to a vote was only when they saw that AirTran MEC wanted nothing other than to force arbitration--something management stated from the outset that it wanted to avoid.

Your attributing SWAPA's influence on SWA management's actions--actions based on management wishes clearly stated before the damn negotiations even started--is the height of ignorance. Apparently YOU are not as smart as your hypothetical 3-year old. Either that, or you're just looking for a reason to blame SWAPA. Either that, or you just really, really, really want some other pilot to lick your balls. I can't tell which.

Bubba
 
Where do you come up with this drivel? SWA paid 1.4 billion for Airtran. 750 mil in cash, the rest in SWA stock. Airtran had 500 mil in the bank so net outlay was around 250 mil. GK told you why-gates, routes,planes, LGA and DCA slots, and all the ATL gates. Far cheaper to acquire than "grow organically" and he says SWA will reap 400 million in synergies this year.
You're a stockholder, go to the shareholders meeting a table a proposal to replace him for his incompetence.

My point was not that it wasn't a good business decision, but rather that it wasn't a good pilot decision. I recognize the difference. Clearly you must as well, as much bitching about it that everyone (including you) does. You're just trying to be contrary to anything someone from Southwest says.

And as far as what the company paid for yours, you're comparing apples to oranges. Issuing stock costs money. Acquiring a company with money in the bank, but lots of liabilities does NOT count as "netting that amount of money." It cost substantially more than "$250 million" to acquire AirTran.

Southwest pilots are not questioning GK's business decision in this case, but rather than we'd rather he spent all that money (and the subsequently-acquired obligations) to grow organically. That way there wouldn't have been all the pain for the employee groups, including yours. Clear now, or do you want to nitpick something else?

Bubba
 
Here ya go, I fixed it for you...

If you REALLY believe the drivel you added to mokitty's post ("combined effort to further screw over AirTran pilots"), then there's probably no hope for you. You may as well as start applying for Walmart jobs now. You're clearly too unstable to be an airline pilot.

Bubba
 
Here ya go, I fixed it for you...

Clyde, think what you want. Trust me, many of my SWA brothers and sisters feel we were screwed with this abomination of a merger just as much as you AT folks.

Lets see, I'm further from upgrade, lost domicile bidding power (since all transitions are FOs until 2015) lost vacation bidding power, and received no pay raise or payout to lessen the sting. If we were conspiring with the GO to screw you I would hope we would have done a better job then scewing the bottom half(or more) of the SWA list.

ATrannies do not have exclusivity on the suck factor, but you got a long list of positives to make the sting less. I just hope neither side whines too much once we're all together because that is not productive and we all got stuff we can complain about.
 
Meh. I'm like some of the others. I show up, do my job and only my job, try to be friendly, and go home. Outside of the occasional chuckle when some gate agent or other employee tries to lecture me on having a warrior spirit, I avoid thinking too much about the merger.

In their defense, most of the SWA guys have been quite friendly, and several have showed me some excellent ways of working the system for more money.
 
Clyde, think what you want. Trust me, many of my SWA brothers and sisters feel we were screwed with this abomination of a merger just as much as you AT folks.

Lets see, I'm further from upgrade, lost domicile bidding power (since all transitions are FOs until 2015) lost vacation bidding power, and received no pay raise or payout to lessen the sting. If we were conspiring with the GO to screw you I would hope we would have done a better job then scewing the bottom half(or more) of the SWA list.

ATrannies do not have exclusivity on the suck factor, but you got a long list of positives to make the sting less. I just hope neither side whines too much once we're all together because that is not productive and we all got stuff we can complain about.

Bingo.

What did the SW guys get out of the deal? Upgrade within the same week (except for the senior FOs)...so nothing there. No equity stake. No increase in salary or any benefit for that matter. I don't know many SW pilots that think this was a good deal for us. I agree with Bubba. I think the CA seats should have fallen where your seniority holds. Nothing more, nothing less. Gary didn't ask me.

You guys are really looking at black helicopters if you think SWAPA had that much power in how this went down. The did have some 'range' of what they hope to get, but in the end...the whole deal (including the list) was orchestrated by Gary.

The first deal with all the C&R's was put together by both Merger Teams. Then Gary signed off with the money. ie, paying the Airtran guys at SWAPA rates immediately.

When the MEC choked on the deal, Gary took over with what he decided would be the next deal. If you think SWAPA put it together then your an fool. Gary plainly took plenty off the table for the Airtran guys. That's exactly what most of us said would happen. Make your best deal the FIRST time. The MEC boned it up completely for all the Airtran guys. The worst move I've ever seen by ALPA. Similiar to the TWA debacle when they wanted AMR pilots back in the fold and offered the TWA guys up as a sacrifice at the alter.

You guys can be angry and resentful for life here, but I don't think you'll find much sympathy if you want to start talking about it. It's a great company with great employees. Keep an open mind, and if you can put it behind you, it will be awesome. Want to stay mired down in the could of/would have, and you'll be miserable for years. Your choice.
 
Some of you guys are absolutely living in a fantasy world. I remember a whole bunch of you, here on this very website, warning us to "be reasonable" in our seniority expectations because uncle Gary will put us on the street if we force his hand. Obviously the boss was talking to SWAPA and the plan was laid out early on. To say otherwise defies logic and sound reasoning.
 
Bingo.

What did the SW guys get out of the deal? Upgrade within the same week (except for the senior FOs)...so nothing there.

Nothing there? Are you actually saying those words?

Those "senior FOs" will occupy every 737 captain seat at AirTran at the time that the merger was announced...yeah, that's nothing, you're right...sheesh.

You guys are really looking at black helicopters if you think SWAPA had that much power in how this went down.

It's not a matter of SWAPA having "power". They likely had something mgt wanted, being in section 6 and all..

Now I get to come over and join the big leagues and be a real major airline pilot..yipdee frickin' doo!
 
We were speaking on our own behalf and the history of how hardcore the GO can negotiate these things. Tie that in with Gary's public comments of wanting a negotiated agreement ASAP....and you have exactly what we where saying. We just put two and two together...nothing complicated. SWAPA kept us mostly in the dark Frog (to my dismay). I'm sorry those facts get in the way of your conspiracy theory.

There were absolutely no 'SWAPA talking points'. If there were, I'd be honest enough to admit it right here, but there wasn't any such thing.
 
Nothing there? Are you actually saying those words?

Those "senior FOs" will occupy every 737 captain seat at AirTran at the time that the merger was announced...yeah, that's nothing, you're right...sheesh.

Frog,

Re-read what I posted. I don't believe any seats should have been 'taken'. I believe the CA seats should have fallen on the merits of the seniority list. Nothing more, nothing less. That part we agree on.

The rest, I'm talking about me personally. I didn't get squat out of this deal. NADA. I didn't double my salary. I didn't get a more stable company. I didn't get to bring my longevity to a carrier that I didn't even work for. I understand what you lost....and what you gained. It's over.
 
I didn't get a more stable company. I didn't get to bring my longevity to a carrier that I didn't even work for. I understand what you lost....and what you gained. It's over.

I sure wish you would've had the opportunity to plead your case to an arbitrator. Funny how we get all the gains yet your side played dirty pool to keep this out of arbitration. That makes sense.

You got a seniority bump (albeit a small one) as a result of our great seniority loss. It's math, you did, you all did.

As far as what I got...can you guarantee any of that? My new seniority is guaranteed. Pan Am was stable at one time, so was Eastern, they were also the highest paying too. So was TWA. No guarantees going forward, except for my new seniority.

DRC is ongoing so it's not totally over. Not holding my breath, but it's not over.
 
Are we still arguing about this? We got screwed because our group is filled with a bunch of cowards. Blame them (or yourself, as the case may be), and move on.
 
We'll be talking about this for the next 30 years or until the last bit of sand is rinsed from my vagina.
 
.

But it wasn't up to us. It was a business decision undertaken by management, and we had absolutely no say. Because we absolutely would have said no. We also can't change it. So we have to live with the results, and make the best of what the future holds.

Bubba

No to rehash history or start a new fight, but you (the pilots)had a say in the intergration and you and your group chose to take as much from us as you could You used management to do your bidding. There was even a proposal to put our stapled guys behind your poolies. Next to AA's stapling of TWA it's the most lopsided intergration in the history of airline mergers. I'm living with it just like the TWA guys did, you won't hear me say anything about it. When you tell me how lucky I am I'll just nod and agree with you, while thinking something else. It's over, we got what we got, but for you to say you had no say in the intergration is completely false. To the victor go the spoils, and you won.[/QUOTE]

And the junior SWA FO's think you're also full of sh/t

I hope we learned that the squeaky wheel gets the grease-

Sorry, but air tran seniority wasn't close to equal - you got a GREAT deal compared to junior SWA FOs
 

Latest posts

Latest resources

Back
Top