I was wondering if there were any lear drivers here that consistantly operate above FL410? If so, do you think that the lower fuel burn is worth your loss of speed? Also, what is the highest you have been in a 20 series Lear?
There's not much reason to operate above 410 in the 25. If you're light, performance wise it's not a problem, but who wants to sit up there using oxygen (and who really does??)?
Been to 450 in the 20 series (24 and 25), but there's generally not much point. Don't forget that the requirement for passengers to wear oxygen (not use, but wear the mask) above 410 is an aircraft limitation. Again, I bet you'd be hardpressed to find anybody that has required their pax to do it, but it's part of the aircraft limitations, and is required.
Take a good look at your oxygen mask for a placard that limits you to 410 max don't know if yours does but I've seen them on some. Personally I don't think the risk is worth going above 410. Remember how quickly the time of usefull consciousness goes down from just 350 to 410. My bet its even quicker between 410 and 450 even with it on. We both know there are way too many smokin holes out there from Lears and/or Lear pilots with oxygen problems. Don't become a Statistic. Live long and prosper.
Went to 510 once with a LR25 with -8A engines just for the fun of it, it had no economic value at all. I would go to 450 on the last hour of a trip, I found 430 to be a nice altitude. LR25 is a pig and it was a struggle to get anywhere near 410, I always flew it at 370 for the first couple of hours then went to 410. The newer LR25's with the dropped tips do a lot better. As for the high altitude flying you can see what it did to me by all my post.
We fly at 430 and 450 all the time in the 24XR and 25 If your on a long trip where fuel may be slightly tight it's worth every bit to get up to those altitudes. Unfortunately, every trip in those planes are tight on fuel.
Realistically not many people wears their masks at those altitudes. But if you don't have the 510 pressurization system with the emer press valves you better think long and hard about what is going to happen to you should you lose pressurization rapidly without you mask on or within about 3 secs of doning!
The extra climb isn't worth it. 1,400 an hour at 410 at .81 or .82 is typical, and there's no reason to go higher to try to get it down any more, because it won't really come down much more.
Besides, much higher, and the monkey might freeze.
In the 24xr and 25b I regularly get it down to 1200 an hour at 430 and 450. Takes about 15 to 18 mins for the climb, depending on the controllers, and have to pull the throttles back at altitude to keep from exceeding .81 Thats a huge savings in fuel and worth going up there just for that savings.
We have many trips nonstop from cleveland to denver...so getting to 450 will make or break that nonstop leg.
My rule of thumb is to be in the flare at 3:15 as long as it's VFR at the destination. Any longer and your not leaving much room!
In our 24D I like to be at 410 or 430 most of the time. Have found very little to be gained by climbing to 450, or by slowing below .80. If ATC cooperates, a 3 hour leg is reasonable. I have flown 3.3 on the hobbs without getting low fuel lights. But, with the typical restricted climbs and early descents, 2.5 is more comfortable. We keep the elastic-band O2 masks around our necks from takeoff to landing, and one of us will be on O2 above 410.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.