Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

L-1011 TriStar First Flight History

  • Thread starter Thread starter rfresh
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 7

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

rfresh

B-777
Joined
Nov 17, 2005
Posts
161
The L-1011 TriStar's first flight took place on the November 16, 1970 - this milestone was actually planned 5 years earlier. The pilot on the maiden flight was Captain Hank Dees, the co-pilot was Captain Ralph Cokely, the Flight Engineer was Glenn Fisher and there was also a 4th crew member on board: Rod Bray, who was the Flight Test Engineer and he sat behind the Captain.

I knew all of them with the exception of Rod Bray whom I'd never met - my boss was Glenn Fisher and I was hired by Lockheed as an L-1011 Flight Engineer Instructor. I was 25 years old when I took my Flight Engineer rating ride in the No.1 test ship with the FAA - at the time I was the youngest L-1011 Flight Engineer flying on that aircraft.

On the day of the maiden flight, the L-1011 test ship, Serial Number 1001, was boarded by it's crew of four early, the before start checklist was accomplished, the engines were started and it finally taxied to the active runway in Palmdale California - then it sat there for a while - however there was nothing wrong - the flight crew was simply waiting for the exact time to release the brakes - as that moment approached, Hank Dees ran the throttles forward to spool up the engines, then released the brakes and pushed the throttles all the way foward to take off power - and at that moment in time - the L-1011 began it's first take off - and met it's planned first flight date exactly 5 years after it was to do so, to the minute!

Soon after being airborne, the flight crew radioed Lockheed dispatch and declared that the aircraft was airworthy (that is, as much as this could mean at this point in the flight test program!). The flight lasted two hours or so and upon returning to land, the leading edge slats failed to extend - the first problem encountered on the flight.

Not all of the emergency procedures nor all of the abnormal procedures had been defined however at this point. This was considered an abnormal procedure, not an emergency. Hank Dees told co-pilot Ralph Cokely to select flaps at 22 degrees for landing which was about 50% of their travel capacity - he next told the Flight Engineer Glenn Fisher to activate the slat locking switch - this is an electronic switch on the back bulkhead of the cockpit to the right of the Flight Engineer station (which is directly behind the co-pilot) - once activated, it would prevent the slats from moving in any direction, up or down. Later as the abnormal procedures were developed for a slats up landing, the flap setting of 22 degrees continued to be the factory recommended setting.

As the TriStar approached for landing, the chase plane continued to film it using 16mm color film, with the flaps set at 22 degrees (the two "landing" flap settings are 28 and 42 degrees), this would not enable automatic spoiler deployment upon touchdown, so Hank Dees reminded Ralph Cokely to make sure he (Hank) manually pulled on the speed brake handle at touch down to ensure spoiler deployment at touch down.

The chase plane film footage showed the 1011 touched down ever so gently on the mains first, then the nose wheel - the landing was probably Hank Dees smoothest landing of his career - afterwards, it prompted Ralph Cokely to comment to Hank "...if you never make a smoother landing it will be alright..."

Upon touch down, the cockpit camera showed that Hank Dees did not initially deploy the speed brakes (spoilers) and that Ralph Cokely had to reach around the throttles to grab the speed brake handle and pull it full aft for spoiler deployment - there was no sound with the film so most likely Hank commanded Ralph to manually deploy the spoilers.
There were 5 test ships assigned to the flight test program. One was dedicated to autopilot certification. Over 500 autolands were done to certify the L-1011's autopilot - at the time this was the most advanced autopilot/autoland system in commercial aviation. It was FAA certified to Category IIIa Autolands - a certification that the B-747 and DC-10 never achieved as a standard feature in factory production.

Cat IIIa limits are 700 feet RVR (Runway Visual Range) and 0 feet DH (Decison Height). All 1011's left the Lockheed factory certified to CAT IIIa standards.

Due to the numerous fog operations conducted in Europe, British Airways went to the added certification expense to certify their TriStar fleet to CAT IIIb standards: 150 feet RVR and 0 feet DH. No commercial aircraft has ever achieved CAT IIIc standards, which are: 0 RVR and 0 DH! This is a completely blind landing - CAT IIIc would require imbedding some kind of electronic guidence in the taxiways as IIIc implys that the pilot cannot see outside the windshield at all - thus he/she would not be able to even taxi the aircraft to the gate after landing!

Another interesting British Airways certification requirement that came up during TriStar production was FAA Stall Certification - in the US, the FAA requirement for the manufacturer was to only take the aircraft to stall warning (that is, when the stall warning horn sounded in the cockpit) and then recover. For European certification however, the requirement was to take the aircraft to full stall and then recover. So, Lockheed took the 1011 out and full stalled it - then they invited the FAA along and demonstrated to them that the TriStar could enter a deep stall and recover safely. The FAA pilot tried it and in the deep stall the wing dropped and he could not recover it - film taken in the chase plane showed that the 1011 rolled inverted during the recovery attempt and finally was pulled out at around 10,000 feet - and the test started at about 25,000 feet! During recovery the aircraft pulled an excessive amount of G loads - the No. 1 test ship had to be hangered until it's structure was completely inspected before returning it to flight status.

On later British Airways training flights, I was an Instructor Flight Engineer and sat through some of these deep stalls in the actual aircraft - in the deep stall the aircraft shook so much you could not see clearly - the pilots just had to hold on to the control wheels and push forward to recover - it was quite a wild ride to say the least.

For flutter testing, the most dangerous part of flight testing, the No. 1 test ship had a 4 foot square "hole" in the passenger floor just aft of the cockpit - there was a fireman's pole coming down from the ceiling directly over the center of this hole and ending at about passenger floor level - in the event something went wrong during flutter testing, the flight crew was susposed to jump onto this pole and slide down thru the hole in the floor - this would place them directly on top of what would normally be the forward lower cargo door, but in this case the "cargo door" was made out of fiberglass so your boots could punch through it and you'd finally be on the outside of the aircraft - then you simply pull on the D-ring of your parachute! This was the emergency bail out system that was designed into the No. 1 test ship, which was assigned to do the flutter testing - but it never had to be used!
 
Interesting post.

Thanks for posting that. Good read.

Can you write a little about the Direct Lift Control system?

I don't entirely understand this but I read a little that mentioned the L1011 and the Space Shuttle (!!!) both use a "Direct Lift Control" system for the autopilot to track the glideslope.

Is it correct to say the autopilot adjusts flap setting during ILS to maintain GS?

Pilots that I've spoken to, who have flown both the 747 and the L1011, think the autopilot on the TriStar is far superior to the Classic.

Thanks.
 
mar said:
Thanks for posting that. Good read.

Can you write a little about the Direct Lift Control system?

Is it correct to say the autopilot adjusts flap setting during ILS to maintain GS?

Thanks.

Yes, I will post something on the DLC system; if not tonite, then tomorrow.

Oh no...even on the TriStar, the landing flaps setting is fixed for the approach and landing; they do not move once set. The wing spoilers engage into their "DLC" mode to help control GS tracking. Let me post about the DLC and you'll understand better.
 
DLC System

DLC - stands for Direct Lift Control - the L-1011 incorporated a pitch-smoothing flight control system within it's spoilers or speed brakes.

The flight spoilers are those retangle metal "boards" you see on top of the wings near the rear of the wings, on the top surface, infront of the flap system. They provide a way for the pilot to create in-flight drag to slow airspeed by deploying these boards or panels into the air. The pilot can pull on a handle and extend the boards any amount the pilot wishes/needs. The maximum deployment angle is 60 degrees.

DLC alone will extend the spoilers to a maximum of 14 degrees. Upon landing, the spoilers are also deployed (normally) automatically (always fully) to kill lift and thus plant more weight on the main gear wheels sooner - so that the anti-skid system can become armed to operate as soon as possible. This is especially critical when landing in the rain with water on the runway.

On approach, when the flaps are set to either one of the 2 landing positions - 33 degrees or 42 degrees - a computer activates and causes all of the flight spoilers to raise on each wing 7 degrees.

Passengers in the cabin can easily see DLC in action! Now, as the aircraft descends on the glide path, normally if the aircraft gets low, the pilot pulls back on the control wheel and this causes the aircraft to pitch up to fly back into the proper glideslope or glidepath. If the aircraft gets too high, the pilot pushes on the control wheel and this causes the aircraft to pitch down and fly back down into the glideslope.

This is how it is on all other commercial jets - now - here is what DLC does for the TriStar: If the aircraft gets too low, the pilot still responds the same way - pulls back on the wheel - however, what happens with DLC is that the spoilers 'retract' a little, thus removing some drag which causes the wings to create additional lift and the aircraft "lifts" itself back up and into the glidepath with minimum pitch changes.

If too high, when the pilot pushes forward on the wheel, the spoilers raise higher on the wings, creating more drag and causes the aircraft to "drift down" or otherwise "settle" back down into the glide path.

So the DLC's action of extending and retracting the spoilers with control column input isn't designed to increase or decrease drag per se, but to increase or decrease lift by changing the airflow over the wing. The end result of all of this is that up and down pitch changes on final approach are *minimized* for passenger comfort, and also makes for a very stable approach platform.

You'll get a smoother ride on final approach in the L-1011 than on any other commercial jetliner because only the L-1011 has Direct Lift Control - and the passengers can watch it in action on every approach!!
 
You're fast.

Thanks. That answered my question.

Any limitation with an engine out?
 
mar said:
Any limitation with an engine out?

No, engine outs were a piece of cake. I remember getting my ME in a C-310 and doing engine cuts at V1. Like most piston twins, if you weren't on the rudder peddles RIGHT NOW you'd be on your back.

In the L-1011, engine cuts in the real airplane at V1 (in those days we used a simulator and the actual airplane for flight training) were very mild - I still recall the first engine cut at V1 - the nose was yawing ever so slowly - all the pilot had to do was just touch the rudder peddle to stop it. Surprised me because we just cut 42,000 pounds of thrust on a wing engine.
 
Great stuff! Is anyone still flying TriStars these days?
 
I still think that the L-1011 is one of the best looking commercial aircraft flying.

Excellent posts. We need some more like them.
 
Great information. Love the Tristar.
Just curious, did it recieve any bad publicity as a result of the Microburst crash at DFW?
WDR11
 
Great story. I flew the 1011 for about four years and it's still at the top of my list, maybe even more fun to fly than the B777. As I recall the 1011 with the analog autopilot vs the digital found in some -500's was certified for CATll autoland with an engine out? Something way ahead of it's then and even now.

You gotta give Lockheed credit they build great flying airplanes.
 
uscpilot said:
Great information. Love the Tristar.
Just curious, did it recieve any bad publicity as a result of the Microburst crash at DFW?
WDR11
Sorry for not being specific, I was refering to the DLC system, not the aircraft in general.
WDR11
 
rfresh said:
Yes, there are a number of non-US carriers and some charters around the world still flying the TriStar.

There is also one US carrier still flying TriStars, and I am fortunate to still be flying them myself.
 
There is something about the L-1011 horizontal stabilizer that makes it unique: In the early design stages, the airlines told Lockheed they wanted the pilots to have more power and control over the pitch system, so that in case of a jet upset, the crew could pull the aircraft out of a dive.

Lockheed designed this extra power into the tail: The L-1011 is the only commercial jet that can take off with full nose down trim. This was actually demonstrated to the airlines during the flight testing phase - with full nose down trim (which is a mis-set trim setting but has happened in the past on other aircraft and caused accidents) the pilot is still able to rotate the aircraft and climb away - it takes a lot of control wheel force to do it but it can be done.

In other aircraft, the control column can be pulled full aft but with full nose down trim the nose won't come up for rotation. For those who don't know: Jet upset was an early event that happened more in the 1950's and early 1960' with the commercial jets than we see today - via rough air, the aircraft would get knocked out of it's stablized cruise condition until it was diving towards the ground out of control - the pilots would attempt to pull back on the wheel to get the nose to come up but most of the jets of that era did not have the power to overcome the excessive speed and thus they could not pull the aircraft out of the dive. Yikes!

When the L-1011 was being designed, the airlines wanted to make sure the L-1011 had enough pitch force to do this should it happen - to this day, a TriStar has never been lost as a result of jet upset and not being able to pull out of the resulting dive.

Now on to the technical description of the L-1011 pitch control system. The L-1011 incorporates an all-flying horizontal stabilizer to control movement in the pitch axis. This "all flying tail" is unique in the commercial aircraft industry (but not general aviation). Pitch control on most airplanes are usually controlled by elevators - on the L-1011 however, the primary part of the tail that controls pitch is the front part called the horizontal stabilizer, the leading edge moves up and down - the elevators are attached to the rear spar of this movable stabilizer piece - the elevators do move, yes, but not under direct pilot control.

The elevators move as a direct result of stabilizer movement only via a physical mechanical link: When the stabilizer moves it's nose downward, the elevators deflect upward to increase the camber of the entire tail - this causes a downward moment and thus pulls the entire rear portion of the aircraft in a downward direction - this causes the nose of the aircraft to pitch up. When the pilot pushes the control wheel forward, this causes the stabilizer nose to move up, causing the elevators to deflect downward, increasing the camber effect to cause a lifting moment and thus pull the tail of the aircraft upward and this in turn causes the nose to pitch down.

The L-1011 has four hydraulic systems - by contrast, the DC-10/MD-11 only have three hydraulic systems. All four of the 1011 hydraulic systems power the horizontal stabilizer, any one of which can operate it. Not all of the flight controls are powered by all four of the hydraulic systems - most are powered by three of the four and only the tail is powered by all four - this is because the pitch system is considered to be the most critical.

Like all widebodied commercial jets, the flight controls are only powered by the hydraulics - there is no manual cable backup system - if you lose all the hydraulics to a given flight control, you lose that flight control.

Note1: Recall the UAL DC-10 flight that crashed at Souix City IA. They lost all three of their hydraulic systems!! They had NO hydraulic control of their flight controls. They used differential thrust to control bank and the electric trim motor to control limited pitch movement. When you realize that they had no hydraulics and no flight control surfaces working, it was absolutely amazing that they got anywhere near an airport runway threshold - but they did - they almost made that landing - if that wing just didn't drop - what an outstanding job they did and talk about flying under pressure!

Note 2: Captain Calvin Dryer took off from SFO in a Pan Am B-747 one sunny day. During their taxi, ATC asked them if they could change departure runways. They said "Sure". They started their take off roll. Suddenly, the end of the runway came up way too soon and Calvin just rotated - early - there was nothing else he could do! No runway remaining to abort, he had some speed but a bit shy of Vr.

The 747 rotated to high - the tail came down and smashed a runway pier which punched thru the cargo area and actually came up thru the pax floor and broke a passenger's leg. The 747 continued to fly and finally got into the air but too slow.

Calvin keep the power on and the jet finally was climbing out but 3 of the 4 hydraulic systems had been lost!! The runway pier severed 3 lines. They were flying on only one system. There was no emergency checklist to cover this condition - Boeing had said the 747 would never loose 3 out of 4 hydraulics.

Now, on their on, the crew started to dump their huge fuel load.

News cameras had time to catch the landng for the evening news. The touch down was hard. The flare was insufficient due to only one of the four elevators working. The plane hit hard and bounced back into the air but came down again. Calvin went into reverse thrust but one engine didn't reverse - this was pulling the plane to the right - you could see the split rudder in action - Calvin had full left deflection trying in vain to correct back to center line. Again, having only half of the rudders working, he could not correct and the 747 slid off the right side of the runway.

Finally coming to rest, the doors opened and the passengers started to evacuate. Then as people were jumping out the doors, the plane became imbalanced and suddenly rocked back on it's tail. The slides on the front doors were not long enough to touch the ground - they now hung vertical and people, not knowing this, continued to exit from the front doors!! Many broke leg bones when they hit the ground!

When the 747 switched runways, Calvin forgot to re-calculate the take off performance. Had he done that, he would have found out that the new runway, for his aircraft's weight, was too short to make the take off.

Two things came out of this accident:

(1) The airline manufuacturers, regardless of how many hydraulic systems were on an aircraft, developed emergency checklist procedures to cover the loss of all systems minus one.

(2) Evac slides were mandated to be long enough to touch the ground with any combination of gear collaspe or body angle.
 
I'm with TriStar_drver at the last North American L1011 operator.....

I have had the fine pleasure flying all 3 seats of the 727 (my second favorite airplane) and flying FO on the Tristar, to every corner of the planet. I can't imagine a better globe cruiser. Smooth, fast, quiet, and very comfortable. Lockheed does build a heck of a machine.

Among other design features one of my favorites is the pitch trim system. There's no trim paddle switch on the yoke, it's controlled by a thumbwheel. You roll in as much or as little as you want, and do it as fast or slow as you want. Once you try it you wonder why any airplane ever had anything else.

Also the gigantic windows make the Alps and the northern lights really fun to gaze out at.

I could go on about lots of stuff, but suffice it to say that I could fly this airplane for the rest of my career (be nice to get newer nav boxes, but that's not an airplane design issue). There's no other airliner I'd rather fly.
 
My Kingdom for a quiet cockpit.

George Zip said:
Smooth, fast, quiet, and very comfortable.

Having spent the last seven years around Garrets and Pratts I think my ears are finally melting in the 747 cockpit.

I also like the "trim wheel" idea.
 
George Zip said:
I'm with TriStar_drver at the last North American L1011 operator.....

I have had the fine pleasure flying all 3 seats of the 727 (my second favorite airplane) and flying FO on the Tristar, to every corner of the planet. I can't imagine a better globe cruiser. Smooth, fast, quiet, and very comfortable. Lockheed does build a heck of a machine.

Among other design features one of my favorites is the pitch trim system. There's no trim paddle switch on the yoke, it's controlled by a thumbwheel. You roll in as much or as little as you want, and do it as fast or slow as you want. Once you try it you wonder why any airplane ever had anything else.

Also the gigantic windows make the Alps and the northern lights really fun to gaze out at.

I could go on about lots of stuff, but suffice it to say that I could fly this airplane for the rest of my career (be nice to get newer nav boxes, but that's not an airplane design issue). There's no other airliner I'd rather fly.

I believe both the JetStar, U2 and maybe the SR71 have a similar thumb trim wheel. Your right, it works real nice!
 
The original test ship of which you speak of, ship 1001, is now parked in Atlanta at Delta's Hanger 1, which is the original hanger used by Delta when they started flying there. The ship is currently used as a gift ship full of Delta's past. The flight deck is still intact and fully accessable.....I have numerous pictures of my sons at the controls at every station.

My understanding is that the ship used to belong to MGM Studios/Walt Disney Corp., and was used in the filming of "Passenger 57", starring Wesley Snipes, among other movies, before being purchased by Delta, taken apart, shipped, and reassembled in Atlanta.

Great stories, keep them coming.

LTG
 

Latest resources

Back
Top