wingnutt
...recognize this?
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2002
- Posts
- 1,079
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
ah...well that about covers it then, doesnt itprpjt said:You are right about the data plate. The 90B's Type Certification is actually C90A. The B is a Raytheon marketing thing to note that there were major changes.
I've never heard of that one. I guess I'm a Hoodoo Guru instead od a King Air Guru...next extra credit question...what was the model number of the King Air prototype that ran fanjets instead of the beloved turboprop, and what type of engine was it?
wingnutt said:yup, are there any around? id love to get my eyeballs on one someday.
next extra credit question...what was the model number of the King Air prototype that ran fanjets instead of the beloved turboprop, and what type of engine was it?
one can only imagine...what was it they were doing to constantly blow the C/L's?350DRIVER said:Watching new guys blow current limiters was also priceless.
improper starting techniques, not paying any attention to the loads prior to starting the other engine. What was even better was how many would attribute this problem to faulty mx and having to write things up to try and save a visit to the CP.wingnutt said:one can only imagine...what was it they were doing to constantly blow the C/L's?
B-100 with Garrett tpe331-6wingnutt said:trivia question for the aficionados...what was the only production model King Air to use an engine other than the P&W PT6A, and what engine was it?
Citationkid said:Cessna did the same thing with the 172SP, which is really just a 172S. I guess it just sells more planes![]()
I saw one in test in Wichita....basically a King Air 200 with fans I guess that is why Beechcraft ended up buying Mitsubishi Diamond changed to Beech jet now the Hawker 400wingnutt said:cool...and to answer the trivia question, Beech did tests in a 200 retrofitted with JT-15D fanjets back in 1975. the engines were placed in the exact spot the PT6's are. it was designated the PD 290 and did more than 100 test flights but was abandonded in 1977 since the airfoil used on the King Airs (and just about every modern other Beech product) was found to create too much drag and wasnt all that much faster than a properly sized turboprop.
sky37d said:B-100 with Garrett tpe331-6
Do I get a prize??
Are the PT-6's quieter?