Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

King Air 100

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Actually, huskiepilot, the KA90 wing is different (a bit longer) than the wing on the 100. The wing on the -100 is almost identical to the wing on the 99. The wing on the A100 is basically the same too, but the fuel setup is different than the earlier -100's (which had filler caps in the nacelles and wings like the 99). The A100 has aux tanks inboard and the main filler caps are further outboard (it's more like the setup on the 200).

I just wanted to point out that the wingspan of a 100 is shorter by about 5 feet than that of a normal 90. Seems weird, but its true. The only exception is the F90 which is a 200 tail, 100 wing and 90 cabin, but that's another story!
 
0 Fuel on the Beech 99 -100 series 9600.(same TC)

All 10 BE99s I've ever flown don't have a zero fuel weight. If you get the proper technique landings in the BE99/100 can be great. I would take a 100 over a 90 (except the F90) any day, but the 200 is way ahead of the 100. Just my $.02
 
Last edited:
I thought landing the 100 was much easier than the 200. Don’t pull it back below 400# torque or SMASH.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom