Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

jugement at 500 hrs vs 5000 hrs?

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
deemee boosgkee said:
From time to time I see other high time pilots preach to low timers about how, in hindsight, little breadth of knowledge and experience they had at say 300 to 1000 hrs for example and how back then they "didn't know what they didn't know." Being a fairly low time pilot myself I am curious as to specific aspects of real world airmanship, judgement and decision making skills that GENERALLY aren't developed among pilots at 500 hrs even though they're stick and rudder skills are adequate, but were later learned several thousand hrs later. Give me specific situations as I am kind of curious. Thanks
I guess the most specific example I can come up with is "How important is this flight?"

I used to fly airplanes that were uninsured or in airplanes where I was uninsured. I've gotten SVFR's in VERY questionable conditions. I've flown equipment that I wouldn't now fly. I've flown trips where my "out" was not only something that's not acceptable to me now, but it was my ONLY out.

Most of this was simply because I wanted to fly. I felt I was exercising good judgement, but looking back I feel it was "good judgement" based on invulnerability.

Oh...and I recently got pictures from the investigating inspector ;)

Fly safe!

David
 
Oddly enough, low time pilots often have to deal with more mechanicals than high time. Here's why. Low time guys are usually droning about in minimally maintained pistons, while the high-timers are often in turbines that are professionally maintained. Turbine reliability is simply awesome. In 22 years of turbine flying, I've shut exactly one engine down as a precaution, and have had VERY few other problems mechanically.

Weather and international ops is the difference, I think. After enough flying, you'll think you have encountered every possible weather phenomenon, yet every year, you add another to your plate. Stuff like grinding, turbulent rain at a non-radar mountanous airport where the controllers have lied - LIED - to you about the vis so his local boys can operate; CATIII RVR vis so thin vertically that the airplane begins its flare at 40 feet and you are still in the clear above the WX, then the jet autolands into the goo. Within 2 seconds you go from VFR on top, to touchdown into SMGS taxi guidance.

Stuff like North Atlantic Track procedures, working HF with Shanwick or Gander, trying to avoid WX and watching the icebergs pass by; calculating SE driftdown over Greenland so if it happens, the passengers will not run out of O2 at 17,000'.

The experiences keep piling up, and you realize that you didn't know squat before, and you'll never know it all, and the number of things out there that can kill you, and all your passengers, are infinite. Respect grows and you become cautious.
 
Studies by the U.S. Navy show that the most dangerous time in a pilot`s career are at the 500 hour mark. Why you ask? Because at that point, a pilot has pretty much mastered the ability to fly and is just about seen enough situations (he thinks). He (or she) does not yet have the experience to know when enough is enough. Many years ago, when I was a pilot in a Marine fighter squadron, a friend and fellow pilot busted his a$$ during a fire power demonstration down at Camp Pendelton. The flight was strafing before a group of Grunts. This fellow pulled up and attemped an aileron roll before the crowd, scooped out, tried to reverse his roll. saw that he couldn`t make it and ejected. The seat fired but the `chute didn`t have time to open. Later the accident board computed that he had logged 499.5 hours.
 
I think just about all the above responses are right. I thought I was "high time" until mobie and retired guy showed up. I'm just a newbie... ;)

It is about attitude. I look at it as I won't quit learning new things and gaining experience until the last time I park the brakes. I know I get complacent--I'm a lot more nervous flying around in a Cherokee than I am heading out across the N. Atlantic. There are no bean fields to put down into at 30W. :eek:

Good topic.TC
 
This is a good thread. I like hearing the "old" guys share their experiences because you just can't learn tht stuff in books. That's why having alot of time usually equates into alot of experience. A 200hr intrument pilot could fly a jet, no problem. It's the decision making that has not been developed at that stage.
 
I think attitude is huge. I am a lower time guy but work with 10,000 hour pilots everyday. They are humbled and realize that these things will kill you and if you are arrogant enough to think otherwise then I don't want to be there when it happens. I was hanging out with a client that had God knows how many hours, ex F-4 pilot in Nam and a recently retired 777 Captain. He was very interested and willing to learn and proactive about this little 182 I brought him. He was interested just as much as a student pilot to the things I was telling him. I think the more cautious you are you hedge your bets even more against Murphy.
 
Hopefully, by 5,000 hrs one learns how to spell "Judgement"...

...sorry, couldn't resist. Back to my hole...
 
When I was around 300+ hours, I wouldn't fly solo IFR. A couple hundred hours later after flying turboprops with more experienced captains around icing, thunderstorms, etc, I was much more comfortable, and found myself being a much greater asset in the cockpit, particularly with newer captains.
Amazing what a couple hundred hours of quality time will do.
Along the lines of what was said earlier, the most experience with more hours will be along the lines of maintenance and weather scenarios. Not that I'm "there." I'm sure I still have a lot to learn.

Oh, and by the way, if you ever work at an entry-level company flying piston planes that tells you about all the 1200+ hour pilots they've weeded out of training, think about it for a minute, they got last pick, the good ones got jobs flying jets or turboprops.
 
That last statement was BS.
 
time builder said:
Oh, and by the way, if you ever work at an entry-level company flying piston planes that tells you about all the 1200+ hour pilots they've weeded out of training, think about it for a minute, they got last pick, the good ones got jobs flying jets or turboprops.

So not true.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top