Judge Silver issued her decision in Addington II

[Bringupthebird]

Honest question, why do you end every sentence with "..." ?

It takes the feeling of facts out of the post and makes it look like rumor.

Do you really think you are dealing with "facts" here at FI?

 

[PuffDriver]

Don't you love how the eastards get giddy over summertime staffing?

I don't remember the APA being restricted by No Bump and Flush.

b. The panel of arbitrators may not render an award unless it complies with all of the following criteria: (i) the list does not require any active pilot to displace any other active pilot from the latter's position; (ii) furloughed pilots may not bump/displace active pilots; (iii) except as set forth in Paragraphs 12 and 13 below, the list does not require that pilots be compensated for flying not performed (e.g., differential pay for a position not actually flown); (iv) the list allows pilots who, at the time of implementation of an integrated seniority list, are in the process of completing or who have completed initial qualification training for a new category (e.g., A320 Captain or 757 First Officer), or who have successfully bid such a position but have not been trained because of conditions beyond their control (such as a company freeze), to be assigned to the positions for which they have been trained or successfully bid, regardless of their relative standing on the integrated seniority list; and (v) it does not contain conditions and restrictions that materially increase costs associated with training or company paid move as specified in the JCBA.




I guess USAPA could negotiate it away though. It's no wonder you lost in court if this is the mentality representing you.

 

[Bringupthebird]

That would be APA negotiating it away and b(i) says the list does not require an active pilot to displace another active pilot, it may permit it if a vacancy is not required in a periodic bid after the SLI is implemented.

I/O/W don't get too comfortable in that seat.

 

[PuffDriver]

That would be APA negotiating it away and b(i) says the list does not require an active pilot to displace another active pilot, it may permit it if a vacancy is not required in a periodic bid after the SLI is implemented.

I/O/W don't get too comfortable in that seat.

Can't even admit when you are wrong. That, or you are too dense to even know what no bump no flush means.

Again,