Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Holy crap and to think that this guy actually sat on his layover quoting a dozen posts thinking up retalitory responses and then taking the time to type these long winded responses call it what you want but i would rather cross a few seatbelts and toss some headsets in the garbage.
Maybe you should just type something like: I love my 50 seat jet that just bumped 8 people because we are weight restricted. I am happy I dont have to fly your 100 seat mainline jet for more than i make at my current job. Good luck to you at jetblue that do.
Or you could just download some free porn rub one out and save yourself about 8 hours a day that you must be wasting posting on flightinfo
Holy crap and to think that this guy actually sat on his layover quoting a dozen posts thinking up retalitory responses and then taking the time to type these long winded responses call it what you want but i would rather cross a few seatbelts and toss some headsets in the garbage.
Maybe you should just type something like: I love my 50 seat jet that just bumped 8 people because we are weight restricted. I am happy I dont have to fly your 100 seat mainline jet for more than i make at my current job. Good luck to you at jetblue that do.
Or you could just download some free porn rub one out and save yourself about 8 hours a day that you must be wasting posting on flightinfo
A little off topic (though not as far off as some of the posts I've seen on this thread)... Why didn't jetBlue go with the A319 when they were looking for a smaller market airframe. I know that the seating capacity is about 30 people more than the E190, but the dimensions/performance of the A319 airframe is similar to that of the E190.
My simpleminded non-MBA approach seems to think that the A319 would have made more economical sense (same type rating + similar avionics and other systems = less $$ needed for pilot/mechanic training and GSE). I am sure that some 100 pound heads did the number crunching and determined that despite all of the similarities that the E190 was better for the market. Just thought I would ask the question. Could the ASM be that much better for the E190 than it is for the A319 (for the desired market) that it overrides the savings from having an all Airbus fleet? The answer is probably quite obvious, but not to this knuckle dragger.
For a 500nm segment, the E190/195 with a 32" pitch has direct operating costs SIGNIFICANTLY lower than an A318/A319 with 32" pitch- somewhere around 20-30% less. Further, their pilot group is essentially flying a 737/DC-9 sized aircraft for what essentially are 50-70 seat RJ wages, another tremendous savings from an operating cost standpoint. Had JetBlue purchased an A318, for example, it is highly unlikely they would have been able to convince the pilot group to fly such a jet for much less than their current A320 wages as they did with the E190. Just those two points alone account for significant decreases in operating costs when comparing the E190 series to a A318/319 type aircraft.
Holy crap and to think that this guy actually sat on his layover quoting a dozen posts thinking up retalitory responses and then taking the time to type these long winded responses call it what you want but i would rather cross a few seatbelts and toss some headsets in the garbage.
Maybe you should just type something like: I love my 50 seat jet that just bumped 8 people because we are weight restricted. I am happy I dont have to fly your 100 seat mainline jet for more than i make at my current job. Good luck to you at jetblue that do.
Or you could just download some free porn rub one out and save yourself about 8 hours a day that you must be wasting posting on flightinfo
Hey Oh-Ryan,A little off topic (though not as far off as some of the posts I've seen on this thread)... Why didn't jetBlue go with the A319 when they were looking for a smaller market airframe. I know that the seating capacity is about 30 people more than the E190, but the dimensions/performance of the A319 airframe is similar to that of the E190.
My simpleminded non-MBA approach seems to think that the A319 would have made more economical sense (same type rating + similar avionics and other systems = less $$ needed for pilot/mechanic training and GSE). I am sure that some 100 pound heads did the number crunching and determined that despite all of the similarities that the E190 was better for the market. Just thought I would ask the question. Could the ASM be that much better for the E190 than it is for the A319 (for the desired market) that it overrides the savings from having an all Airbus fleet? The answer is probably quite obvious, but not to this knuckle dragger.
Hey Oh-Ryan,
Is that your squadron patch on David Haselhorf's bananna boat?
No, we don't a have squadron patch yet... still working on that. A Bananna Boat theme is one of the options we are pursuing. My choice would be to get The Hoff, Ryan Secrest and Clay Aiken together for a photo and then have that photo converted into a squadron patch with some kind of catchy slogan like "If you're not metro, then you're not sexual".
Until a decision is made regarding this matter we will continue to do the only thing we can do for inspiration... stare at the perfectly preserved and hermetically sealed speciman of 3 strands of The Hoff's chest hair that we have on display in the wardroom.
I will keep you posted.
PS.
Stop staring at The Hoff's package.
It's hideous--yet I can't look away.No, we don't a have squadron patch yet... still working on that. A Bananna Boat theme is one of the options we are pursuing. My choice would be to get The Hoff, Ryan Secrest and Clay Aiken together for a photo and then have that photo converted into a squadron patch with some kind of catchy slogan like "If you're not metro, then you're not sexual".
Until a decision is made regarding this matter we will continue to do the only thing we can do for inspiration... stare at the perfectly preserved and hermetically sealed speciman of 3 strands of The Hoff's chest hair that we have on display in the wardroom.
I will keep you posted.
PS.
Stop staring at The Hoff's package.
Outstanding!!! Regionaltard is somehow missing the point. We are all responsible for the fall of this profession. He wants to deflect the criticism of his regional job where he lets his flight attendants wear the blue gloves and clean up the airplane (thus depriving union "cleaners" their due) while he sports his oversized Raybans on his walkaround, yet its time to bash JB because its non union.
We are all responsible for this downfall. Airbus and Boeing and Canadair and Embraer are not slowing down production of airplanes. As older airplanes are replaced, startups get those old airplanes. The new airplanes are easy to fly allowing 20 year olds to get jet experience quick and left seat time quicker. With the reliability of the new airplanes, quick turns are the standard allowing 90-100 hour months. Lots of qualified pilots means we are not a commodity anymore. This allows the business types to use the phrase "pilots are a dime a dozen" (Doug Steenland--NWA)
Regionaltard, you took your regional job for what purpose? Are you telling me you never made the connection that your 50-70 seat jet was being used to whipsaw 100+ seat flying at your mainline? Did you not make the connection that you were actually competing for mainline flying? Of course you did but you said "Oh its just a little piece and eventually they will need a guy of my caliber at the mainlines so I'll just sit here with the big Raybans" and get older and older and getting more and more defensive. JB is also competing for that business just like you. How are you not part of the problem? Whatever regional you used to compare rates with at JB is insignificant. If you are using one temporary example at a regional you do not even work for to support your argument its like saying "sure my pay sucks here, but regionals don't suck because my buddies at Rayban air are making plenty" They will soon be under managements microscope and brought into line using the case histories that came before i.e. Comair, Mesaba, Pinnacle, etc. For whatever reason, it is convienient for management to appease them at the moment--but that will change. Your fingerpointing at JB is pathetic.
Again, regionaltard takes no responsibilty for accepting low pages and poor work rules because he wants to get to a legacy--denying the fact that it was his own acceptance of the poor pay and work rules that started the lowering of the bar at the legacies--and he has the gall to point to ALPA as the cause. How unmanly. ALPA was the cause. RJs were the cause. Mainline pilots pushing for too much was the cause. LCC's were the cause. Airbus and Boeing and Canadair and Embraer lowering their prices through competition was the cause. Startups using the old jets are the cause. For a fu<king rj guy to pontificate that JB is what caused the fall of the legacies is beyond the pale. I understand the dynamics of capitalism and do not hold anything against rj guys who are out doing the job they love, but lets stop the fingerpointing. JB is part of "the problem" in that the forces of capitalism created the LCC model at Southwest. The forces of capitalism created the RJ model at Comair. Other airlines started up to copy those models and here we are, you at a regional and I at JB. I am at JB because my legacy has been torn apart by the forces of capitalism. I was at this legacy for 8 years. I guess I could have done like you and gone to a regional, but why not? Because the pay and work rules suck. Regionaltard, I suggest you put in your app again at JB in 6 months.
Outstanding!!! Regionaltard is somehow missing the point. We are all responsible for the fall of this profession. He wants to deflect the criticism of his regional job where he lets his flight attendants wear the blue gloves and clean up the airplane (thus depriving union "cleaners" their due) while he sports his oversized Raybans on his walkaround, yet its time to bash JB because its non union.
We are all responsible for this downfall. Airbus and Boeing and Canadair and Embraer are not slowing down production of airplanes. As older airplanes are replaced, startups get those old airplanes. The new airplanes are easy to fly allowing 20 year olds to get jet experience quick and left seat time quicker. With the reliability of the new airplanes, quick turns are the standard allowing 90-100 hour months. Lots of qualified pilots means we are not a commodity anymore. This allows the business types to use the phrase "pilots are a dime a dozen" (Doug Steenland--NWA)
Regionaltard, you took your regional job for what purpose? Are you telling me you never made the connection that your 50-70 seat jet was being used to whipsaw 100+ seat flying at your mainline? Did you not make the connection that you were actually competing for mainline flying? Of course you did but you said "Oh its just a little piece and eventually they will need a guy of my caliber at the mainlines so I'll just sit here with the big Raybans" and get older and older and getting more and more defensive. JB is also competing for that business just like you. How are you not part of the problem? Whatever regional you used to compare rates with at JB is insignificant. If you are using one temporary example at a regional you do not even work for to support your argument its like saying "sure my pay sucks here, but regionals don't suck because my buddies at Rayban air are making plenty" They will soon be under managements microscope and brought into line using the case histories that came before i.e. Comair, Mesaba, Pinnacle, etc. For whatever reason, it is convienient for management to appease them at the moment--but that will change. Your fingerpointing at JB is pathetic.
Again, regionaltard takes no responsibilty for accepting low pages and poor work rules because he wants to get to a legacy--denying the fact that it was his own acceptance of the poor pay and work rules that started the lowering of the bar at the legacies--and he has the gall to point to ALPA as the cause. How unmanly. ALPA was the cause. RJs were the cause. Mainline pilots pushing for too much was the cause. LCC's were the cause. Airbus and Boeing and Canadair and Embraer lowering their prices through competition was the cause. Startups using the old jets are the cause. For a fu<king rj guy to pontificate that JB is what caused the fall of the legacies is beyond the pale. I understand the dynamics of capitalism and do not hold anything against rj guys who are out doing the job they love, but lets stop the fingerpointing. JB is part of "the problem" in that the forces of capitalism created the LCC model at Southwest. The forces of capitalism created the RJ model at Comair. Other airlines started up to copy those models and here we are, you at a regional and I at JB. I am at JB because my legacy has been torn apart by the forces of capitalism. I was at this legacy for 8 years. I guess I could have done like you and gone to a regional, but why not? Because the pay and work rules suck. Regionaltard, I suggest you put in your app again at JB in 6 months.
Why does everything have to be a SECRET? There's nothing wrong with posting some good news for a change. Anyway, I don't use that "private site" because it's filled with too many people like you...
brainhurts said:For a fu<king rj guy to pontificate that JB is what caused the fall of the legacies is beyond the pale.
brainhurts said:Regionaltard, I suggest you put in your app again at JB in 6 months.
Spectre said:So, here's to all the naysayers out there. This was all done without ALPA's help.
Your smug disdain for ALPA sickens me. Granted, it's currently a deeply flawed institution but even so this industry is immeasurably better for its presence. Read the book and then tell me what you think things would look like today after 60 years of the JB model.
Wow, you can't take a joke. You really sound dumb now. You are nuts.
Bye Bye--General Lee