Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

JetBlue Q

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Bottom line, I would never ask a pilot for job advice. Most of us are where we are by luck, and none of us can say we will be better off in 10 years, unless you're a liar. Go with your gut feeling, that's what 99.9% of the people on this board did, not by sitting around doing "Pros' vs Con's", it won't be the same in 10 years, better of worse. Then again, maybe you shouldn't even listen to me.
 
As someone mentioned, this thread is waaaaay too timely. I too just got the call from JB for an interview. Two days ago I got the call from CAL for an interview. Prior to that I couldn't even get my brother to call me, he called today too ;-) When it rains it poors I guess!

Time to go to my favorite watering hole for a "Black & Blue."

Cheers ya'll
 
starvingredtail said:
I can tell you that JB really believes in itself and that it is pretty cool being here (of course thats only been a week) and from top to bottom it is like nothing I have seen before in this industry. I left NWA after 8 years for a place that is great to work. It sounds like you have a good gig at Net Jets. Good luck on the decision.


It's good that u left and I hope u are senior to me(May '98). I bet you took one of those voluntary furlough options... Goes to show u how confident u are in the " from top to bottom it is like nothing I have seen before in this industry" company you now love so much... Things suck over here and thats a fact... It can only get better... Good luck with YOUR decision... I would never have done it... There are a lot better options to me that JB...

Later
 
JAM-BRO said:
It's good that u left and I hope u are senior to me(May '98). I bet you took one of those voluntary furlough options... Goes to show u how confident u are in the " from top to bottom it is like nothing I have seen before in this industry" company you now love so much... Things suck over here and thats a fact... It can only get better... Good luck with YOUR decision... I would never have done it... There are a lot better options to me that JB...

Later

Perfect example of what CanyonBlue said earlier.."never take career advice from a pilot"
 
Just a little advice!

It's obvious you got alot of info to make your decision, based on all the feedback.
The answer now rests with you.
Things to consider:
-You will be commuting for a long time unless you want to live at JFK, FLL, BOS, or LGB.
-Some of those commute days will be your off days.
-The company is still growing like crazy.
-Yes it may be 5-6 years before you see the left seat in the 320 but that's still better than most.
-Think about the money consumed for commuting (i.e. crashpad, bus, AIRTRAIN, taxi's to and from LGA).
We have quite a few trips with red-eye's.

Obviously, there is something making you question your current status at NJ's. Just don't lose sight of the big picture...it's the airline industry, and it will always be cyclic. Good Luck in your decision.
One more thing, the answer truely lies with you and your family...if you've been in the industry for awhile then you know this goes without saying...there aren't to many jobs out there that pay high enough for you to sacrifice your "Quality of Life" or your families.
 
To make it just a bit more interesting:

Logan to be a home base for JetBlue

Move could create jobs and improve reliability of service

By Peter J. Howe, Globe Staff | March 24, 2006

JetBlue Airways Corp., the fastest-growing airline at Logan International Airport, is expected to outline plans today to turn Boston into its fourth base for pilots and flight attendants, a move that could create dozens of new jobs at Logan and improve service reliability for passengers here.
Article Tools


More:



Beginning in June, JetBlue will use Logan as a home base for about 130 flight crew members, including as many as 80 pilots who fly its 156-seat Airbus A320 jets.
By fall, JetBlue also expects to have about 60 pilots for its 100-seat Embraer E190 planes based in Boston, company officials said.
JetBlue's chief executive, David Neeleman, is set to offer details today in a speech at the Boston Globe Travel Show at the World Trade Center, JetBlue spokeswoman Jenny Dervin said.
Besides the promise of more Boston-based jobs, JetBlue's plans could help the airline offer somewhat more reliable service in Boston, especially when weather and traffic disrupt flight schedules. Instead of having to wait for a crew to come from one of the airline's three existing operating bases -- New York, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Long Beach, Calif. -- to operate a flight from Logan, JetBlue by summer will have a cadre of pilots and flight crews based in the city who could be called in to get flights back on schedule.
Some JetBlue workers who now live near Boston but commute to work from John F. Kennedy International Airport in New York will be able to work out of Logan instead.
''It's good for the regional economy, because it puts the jobs here and bases them in the city, and it's a good thing for Logan customers, too," said Thomas J. Kinton Jr. aviation director for the Massachusetts Port Authority, which runs Logan. ''It's a pool of employees that are readily available to draw from, which helps" when flights are being rescheduled, he said.
JetBlue will be the fourth airline to have pilots based in Boston, Kinton said. American Airlines, Delta Air Lines, and US Airways, the three biggest carriers by passenger volume at Logan, have pilots and flight attendants based in Boston. United Airlines has flight attendants, but not pilots, based in the city.
JetBlue's decision also reflects its rapid growth in Boston and its commitment to grow here. The airline currently flies nonstop from Boston to 15 US cities and plans to add direct service to Richmond, Va., April 6; Phoenix May 3; and Buffalo and Pittsburgh June 30.
JetBlue offers 45 daily nonstop flights from Logan, including as many as 10 to JFK, six to Dulles International Airport outside Washington, D.C., and five to Orlando.
''We are certainly planning on growing jobs in Boston," Dervin said.
Despite running a net loss of $42 million in the fourth quarter of last year because of soaring jet fuel prices -- the airline's first loss since its 2000 founding -- Dervin said JetBlue remains on track to hire new crew members at the rate of eight to 10 every day this year.
JetBlue, which moved into the Logan Terminal C space vacated by Delta last year, when Delta moved to its $500 million Terminal A, has signed a deal with Massport to take over 11 gates in Terminal C by November 2008. It uses seven already.
''Making Boston a JetBlue crew base really speaks to our commitment to serve Boston," Dervin said.
Unlike most other US airports, especially hubs, where one or two airlines dominate, no single airline at Logan consistently controls more than about 20 to 22 percent of the market, Massport data show.
''Boston is a fair playing field for airlines," Dervin said. ''No airline can claim Boston as a hometown, so everyone has to fight for the right to serve customers."
Peter J. Howe can be reached at [email protected].
dingbat_story_end_icon.gif

© Copyright 2006 Globe Newspaper Company.
 
Hooky2 said:
Besides the promise of more Boston-based jobs, JetBlue's plans could help the airline offer somewhat more reliable service in Boston, especially when weather and traffic disrupt flight schedules. Instead of having to wait for a crew to come from one of the airline's three existing operating bases -- New York, Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and Long Beach, Calif. -- to operate a flight from Logan, JetBlue by summer will have a cadre of pilots and flight crews based in the city who could be called in to get flights back on schedule.

I don't think the issues surrounding JBLU punctuality is really crew issues at JBLU. More unrealistic schedules, ATC and various other issues that surround this carrier. Having a reserve at the airport does not magically make an airplane arrive for them to fly.

Either way on-time is starting to unveil the dirty little secret of the jblu experience.
 
32LT10 said:
I don't think the issues surrounding JBLU punctuality is really crew issues at JBLU. More unrealistic schedules, ATC and various other issues that surround this carrier. Having a reserve at the airport does not magically make an airplane arrive for them to fly.

Either way on-time is starting to unveil the dirty little secret of the jblu experience.

LT,

Who do you fly for now? What is the dirty little secret? Share it with us if you know, or is that just a sound bite that makes you feel good.

DW
 
32LT10 said:
I don't think the issues surrounding JBLU punctuality is really crew issues at JBLU. More unrealistic schedules, ATC and various other issues that surround this carrier. Having a reserve at the airport does not magically make an airplane arrive for them to fly.

Either way on-time is starting to unveil the dirty little secret of the jblu experience.

You are right, in that jb needs to improve its on-time performance. Some of that has been addressed, and procedures are in the works to better coordinate its crewmembers during a turn. As for the main airports jb serves and the continued delays with wx or atc -- those be the breaks for choosing those cities as bases.

You know, you would do better to take the acrimony out of your posts. I js on United and have so many stories of poor service whether at the gate or from the inflight on the plane -- and I am not talking about how they treat me, they always treat me fine -- yet I refuse to believe that those experiences define a company. Obviously United is doing something right to have survived a difficult time.

... don't throw stones, you'll break your glass house.
 
Bavarian Chef said:
I js on United and have so many stories of poor service whether at the gate or from the inflight on the plane .

Every carrier has operational issues. However, the BJLU crews would have you think that their carrier does not suffer any type of operational or personell issues.

If you don't like what you get when you j/s on UAL then I would encourage you to find alternate transportation. Please do not subject yourself to something you are not comfortable with. If you want I can post your message on our ALPA forum so we can make all the pilots aware that you are not so happy getting a ride on UAL. This will assist others in making sure you are not subjected to any additional exposure to this poor service.
 
32LT10 said:
Every carrier has operational issues. However, the BJLU crews would have you think that their carrier does not suffer any type of operational or personell issues.

If you don't like what you get when you j/s on UAL then I would encourage you to find alternate transportation. Please do not subject yourself to something you are not comfortable with. If you want I can post your message on our ALPA forum so we can make all the pilots aware that you are not so happy getting a ride on UAL. This will assist others in making sure you are not subjected to any additional exposure to this poor service.

Lets not start a JS war over this. I am very gratefull when I have flown on United and they have always been very gratefull when they JS on us. Why cant we just be happy with that. There is no need to bash or make poor comments towards others services when we are flying for free. Its a ride home to the family and that all that should matter. This post in intended for everyone in general..not just you LT
 
Longhorn said:
Lets not start a JS war over this. I am very gratefull when I have flown on United and they have always been very gratefull when they JS on us. Why cant we just be happy with that. There is no need to bash or make poor comments towards others services when we are flying for free. Its a ride home to the family and that all that should matter. This post in intended for everyone in general..not just you LT


I am only encouraging one of your own to choose travel on a carrier that meets his/her expectations. Every city UAL serves is also served by other airlines. We don't have a monopoly and this pilot is encouraged to choose one of those carriers that meets the service level they desire.
 
32LT10 said:
I am only encouraging one of your own to choose travel on a carrier that meets his/her expectations. Every city UAL serves is also served by other airlines. We don't have a monopoly and this pilot is encouraged to choose one of those carriers that meets the service level they desire.

Read my post again, 32. I have been treated just fine on UAL and am glad for the ride. I try to be the most respectful and appreciative jumpseater out there. I was speaking about some instances that I have seen involving passengers, not me. My point, which may have been poorly illustrated, is that I don't think that UAL can be characterized as a whole by those instances, so why do you characterize jb the way you do? Why do you paint it with such a broad brush, when there is so much more to flying on jb?

Why I am I asking questions that I know the aswer to? jb is the devil, jb is the devil. I forgot. Sorry.

edited for spelling
 
Last edited:
32LT10 said:
Every carrier has operational issues. However, the BJLU crews would have you think that their carrier does not suffer any type of operational or personell issues.

Did I ever say that we do not have similar instances with our customer service or inflight crewmembers?

Your response proves my point. I CHOOSE not to get on here every day and post drivel about UAL or any other airline for that matter. You do. Man you were gone a whole week? What did we talk about without you?

"...and I am not talking about how they treat me, they always treat me fine -- yet I refuse to believe that those experiences define a company. Obviously United is doing something right to have survived a difficult time."

That's not a bust, it's actually a prop.
 
Last edited:
LT, all you are is background static on this forum and proof that cosmic radiation does turn pilots' brains into mush after flying beyond 10,000 hours. Your comments do nothing to promote an honest debate about B6's role in this industry.

Your purpose is clear and unwavering; you want to promote your myopic and ill-informed agenda by playing the role of bomb thrower. What a shame that somebody with your supposed background (BTW, I doubt the veracity of it) has only this to show for all that experience.

I'm here to tell you that you don't know one iota about B6 and what its problems are. So don't pretend you've got some corner on the market when it comes to knowing B6's "dirty little secrets." FYI, I've forgotten more about JetBlue's problems than you'll ever know.

As someone else has already mentioned, don't throw rocks in glass houses. Certainly United is no paragon to how an airline should be run, and one with a much longer list of FUs that just about any other airline in the business. However, if you insist on continuing to make an a$$ out of yourself let me give you some cheap advice (something you should appreciate).

Try seeking out professional therapy for your deep-rooted problems and insecurities. It's a better way to get your pathetic life back on track than your current approach of acting like a 10 year old bully in a school yard.

BTW, I'm sorry I won't be able to respond in a "timely" manner to your predictable caustic reponse. Unlike you, I don't make a habit of trolling on this board because I find there are a lot more interesting things to do in the real world with my time than read your adolescent drivel.
 
Hooky2 said:
Beginning in June, JetBlue will use Logan as a home base for about 130 flight crew members, including as many as 80 pilots who fly its 156-seat Airbus A320 jets.

More crew bases = added costs

More fleet types = added costs

Jet Blue = People Express

It's only a matter of time.....

glug glug glug glug glug.........
 
fractional

To me it depends on what you like...i personally dont like sucking up to a rich person, loading all their crap, making them a drink, making sure there is coffee, ice and newspapers on board, cleaning the lav, stocking the airplane and all the crap that goes along with fractional flying. I worked fractional, then went to Continental, and finally enjoy what i'm payed to do, fly, and then walk off the airplane.......good riddens fractionals!!!
 
and boom goes the dynomite

fractionals aren't for everyone. It's that simple. Not everyone can think outside of the box.

ever wonder why jblu loves fractional pilots? Because we come from a customer service background. Some people just don't understand that when coming to a fractional.

Different strokes for different folks. We don't have an FA protecting us from the pissed off pax.
 
Last edited:
Oh I see that 32 been allowed back to soil the threads again. Just add him to your ignore list and he goes away. As far as jumpseating on UAL, my experiences, as well as the Chef's, have all been very positive and enjoyable. Nice people doing a tough job well, in spite of their management. My only fear is having to run into 32. But even with a perfect body, mind and soul, there still is one AH.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top