lowecur
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 14, 2003
- Posts
- 2,317
The long term prospects of USA remaining in anything that resembles it's current size and shape are not good. I agree, but they will sell assets to survive if necessary. They will be here next year. Bet taken, where are you located so I can get my free beer. South Florida.......you got a deal.
No, I am talking to you and the ironic thing is that you answered. What I am saying is that they are planning on bring 4 totally new, different airframes to the market place at one time, the 170/175/190 &195. Are you telling me that this can be done with out ANY difficulties? No, but the commonality in the a/c will pay dividends as the other airframes come on-line. The major problems with the 170 have been Honeywell avionic software. By the time the 190 comes on line, those problems should be ironed out.
Really what percentage of 319s do you think are sold Vs the 320? You, have to admit they are still popular. Even better how may A318's are out there? Now you're changing the subject. History has taught us that the smallest airframe traditionally sells the worst. Are you saying that this is not the case? No, you just changed the subject to suit your arguement.
Then why are you arguing that LUV will eventually purchase the smaller airframe? The 190 is too close to the 737NG in size. It's not a good match for LUV, although I believe they will purchase some 190's to supplant the 735's. If history has taught us one thing more people will be flying in the future. LUV can create demand with their ticket prices if they have the supply. You said "the CASM's on the 190 were on par with those of the 175." If the costs of flying the 195 are even remotely close to the 170/175, why choose the smaller aircraft? Jetblue seems to think along those lines. Jetblue, at present has a much larger average stage length than WN. The 190 fills a gap for B6 better than a 78-86 pax 175. The 175 will fill the gap better than a 190. The 100 seater is too close in size to the 737NG.
Again you ignore the question, how did they do in a fare war with LUV? The same way they did in a fare war with DL in ATL.....they lost.You can talk slots out of LGB, the bottom line is they got their butts kicked because LUV has the assets to sell $39 seats to and from LAS all day long. I'm not bashing B6. In fact it's smart to get out. Why put an aircraft into a money losing fare war when you can get higher yield someplace else? But yet you continue to suggest this, is a good idea. No, I'm saying that it is inevitable that the two will match up much more in the next 5 years, and B6 will do just fine as they build out their network of 190s. My point is, you can put the 190 or the A320 or AA can put an MD80 up against LUV. Whomever whatever, they will lose. They are then low, cost 800 pound guerilla that drives the domestic fare structure. Sorry, but you are talking in the present tense, and that will just not be the case in the next five years, unless WN pilots take a 15-20% haircut.
As far as gate space, it doesn't come for free. It costs big money. IF UAL ever decides to reduce on the West coast those gates will no doubt be part of an asset sale, not just returned for free so that B6 can have them. I think assets can be had quite cheap in 7.
Can you please provide a link to where Embraer compairs the costs of the 737-800 to the 190? Now it's the 738. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the 737NG, 738, or 739 would cost considerably more to maintain than the 736. As airframes and powerplants increase in size, that's just a fact. And stop with the economies of scale arguement.
Now what about other components like brakes and pumps? How many rebuilt hyd pumps are available for the Embraer 170 series? What about vendors capable of rebuilding brakes? These are huge advantages that the 737 has and will take years if ever for the 170 series to catch up. Sorry, but I disagree. Just watch the orders for the E-series roll in the next 3 years. If the 737 had all these advantages, the 736 would be doing much better.
I have to say, that I'll bet you have your application in at WN. Your arguements are a givaway as an apologist for both AMR and WN. Wherever you end up, it will suit your arguement. If you do get to WN, are you gonna vote for the 15-20% haircut?.......not if you are already in the 737 seat....you'll vote for the purchase of the E-series.
No, I am talking to you and the ironic thing is that you answered. What I am saying is that they are planning on bring 4 totally new, different airframes to the market place at one time, the 170/175/190 &195. Are you telling me that this can be done with out ANY difficulties? No, but the commonality in the a/c will pay dividends as the other airframes come on-line. The major problems with the 170 have been Honeywell avionic software. By the time the 190 comes on line, those problems should be ironed out.
Really what percentage of 319s do you think are sold Vs the 320? You, have to admit they are still popular. Even better how may A318's are out there? Now you're changing the subject. History has taught us that the smallest airframe traditionally sells the worst. Are you saying that this is not the case? No, you just changed the subject to suit your arguement.
Then why are you arguing that LUV will eventually purchase the smaller airframe? The 190 is too close to the 737NG in size. It's not a good match for LUV, although I believe they will purchase some 190's to supplant the 735's. If history has taught us one thing more people will be flying in the future. LUV can create demand with their ticket prices if they have the supply. You said "the CASM's on the 190 were on par with those of the 175." If the costs of flying the 195 are even remotely close to the 170/175, why choose the smaller aircraft? Jetblue seems to think along those lines. Jetblue, at present has a much larger average stage length than WN. The 190 fills a gap for B6 better than a 78-86 pax 175. The 175 will fill the gap better than a 190. The 100 seater is too close in size to the 737NG.
Again you ignore the question, how did they do in a fare war with LUV? The same way they did in a fare war with DL in ATL.....they lost.You can talk slots out of LGB, the bottom line is they got their butts kicked because LUV has the assets to sell $39 seats to and from LAS all day long. I'm not bashing B6. In fact it's smart to get out. Why put an aircraft into a money losing fare war when you can get higher yield someplace else? But yet you continue to suggest this, is a good idea. No, I'm saying that it is inevitable that the two will match up much more in the next 5 years, and B6 will do just fine as they build out their network of 190s. My point is, you can put the 190 or the A320 or AA can put an MD80 up against LUV. Whomever whatever, they will lose. They are then low, cost 800 pound guerilla that drives the domestic fare structure. Sorry, but you are talking in the present tense, and that will just not be the case in the next five years, unless WN pilots take a 15-20% haircut.
As far as gate space, it doesn't come for free. It costs big money. IF UAL ever decides to reduce on the West coast those gates will no doubt be part of an asset sale, not just returned for free so that B6 can have them. I think assets can be had quite cheap in 7.
Can you please provide a link to where Embraer compairs the costs of the 737-800 to the 190? Now it's the 738. It doesn't take a genius to figure out that the 737NG, 738, or 739 would cost considerably more to maintain than the 736. As airframes and powerplants increase in size, that's just a fact. And stop with the economies of scale arguement.
Now what about other components like brakes and pumps? How many rebuilt hyd pumps are available for the Embraer 170 series? What about vendors capable of rebuilding brakes? These are huge advantages that the 737 has and will take years if ever for the 170 series to catch up. Sorry, but I disagree. Just watch the orders for the E-series roll in the next 3 years. If the 737 had all these advantages, the 736 would be doing much better.
I have to say, that I'll bet you have your application in at WN. Your arguements are a givaway as an apologist for both AMR and WN. Wherever you end up, it will suit your arguement. If you do get to WN, are you gonna vote for the 15-20% haircut?.......not if you are already in the 737 seat....you'll vote for the purchase of the E-series.
Last edited: