Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

JetBlue Direct TV to cost millions more?

  • Thread starter Thread starter MCDU
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 4

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

MCDU

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 9, 2003
Posts
1,146
I heard that the direct TV installation on JetBlues airplanes may cost them millions more. I was in Winnipeg and found out that the antennas where installed wrong and that there are now cracks found around where the antennas where installed. Planes that where supposed to be out of maintenance still sitting in Air Canada hangers. The problem is they can not sue their live TV provider since they bought them. Might cost JetBlue lots of money. Any Blue drinkers like to comment if there is any truth to this. Thanks.

Regards,

Marty
 
Last edited:
The antennas are installed by Airbus in Toulouse prior to delivery.
 
.....................they are free just like the airplanes..........................
 
I do not think it was the antenna itself, but wiring leading to it.

cheers
 
>>antennas where installed <<
>>>Planes that where supposed<<

I don't know about the antenna situation, but I sure do know you don't know how to spell WERE.
 
Your right, thats because I am from Canada. We can not spell up here. Thanks for the corrections.

where ,were, wear- I confuse them all the time. Thats why I am not an english teacher.

cheers,
Marty
 
Last edited:
[font=ARIAL,]JetBlue likely to challenge ATA-AirTran deal
Dateline: Monday December 06, 2004

JetBlue Airways is interested in operating into Chicago Midway from its New York JFK base as well as acquiring slot exemptions at New York LaGuardia that ATA Airlines has agreed to sell to AirTran Airways, CEO David Neeleman said Friday.

Speaking in Washington at a meeting hosted by the Aviation Safety Alliance, Neeleman challenged the terms of the $87.6 million agreement between ATA and AirTran. "I'm still confused about the whole Chicago thing," he said. "The way we read the gate rules--and we've been over to Midway a couple of times and talked to [airport officials]--these aren't gates that can be sold. They are not the property of AirTran or ATA."
He also said that the slot exemptions granted ATA by the US Dept. of Transportation do not belong to the airline but need to be returned to DOT if ATA is not using them. "We are standing in line for [ATA's] LGA slots," he stated. At the same time, he stressed, "We don’t want to grow Chicago in a big way…We don't think that is a smart thing for us."

In a wide-ranging discussion, Neeleman repeated earlier guidance that the carrier expects to show a net loss for the fourth quarter, which would represent its first quarterly loss since 2001. But he added that "JetBlue was built for the bad times…for very difficult times, times like 9/11, times like now…We have a strong balance sheet, we have access to capital, we have enough cash to see us through very difficult times and we have the best product in the industry." He joked, "Half of me wants the [price of oil] to go to $25 per barrel and half of me wants it to go to $60 a barrel."--Perry Flint
[/font]
[font=ARIAL,]Maybe they will post a loss due to faulty installation of Live TV which will cost them alot of money?

[/font]
 

Latest resources

Back
Top