Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It would be time consuming and expensive to dump them....we'll see.
I thought I read somewhere that USairways is trying to get rid of their 190 fleet as well?
I think republic took some.
Interesting! Has the company actually mentioned trying to replace the 190s? More Bus's?
I think republic took some.
Bosses talk. If your suggesting merger what good does that do for jetblue. It gives them a hub with the largest airline in the world(UAL) and the most competitive(SWA). What airline would knowingly walk into that?
The 190 has turned out to be a very expensive piece of doo doo. The company has finally admitted the future of the 190 is questionable and future delivery numbers will be reevaluated. The airplane can not make money over 800 miles. Also the heavy checks are proving to be more costly than the Airbus. The 319 NEO, albeit only a paper airplane at this time, is expected to have only slightly higher costs than the 190. Interesting times.......
So what's going on with these planes? Why are they failing?
I think there is a better chance they were discussing an aircraft swap. We have about the same amount of 190's as Frontier has 319/320's. We are frustrated with the 190's and could off load them to Republic. In turn Bedford (now that he has his concessions)can sell the airbuses and turn Frontier into a single fleet. Do I think this will actually happen? Probably not but that is a more likely scenario then a merger/buyout of Frontier.
I still think a merger is more likely down the road. Think about it - you get the Airbuses, you get a new West Coastish hub in Denver (without limited LGB slots - you can actually grow the hub a bit), a new mini-hub in MKE, and you have one less low-cost competitor (especially for East-West traffic). It makes sense from a strategic standpoint. Perhaps the E190 trade would still take place as part of the deal...
Regardless, I am sure the Investment Bankers and the high-paid McKinsey consultants will have it all figured out. :crying::laugh::bawling:![]()
They are Embraers, do I have to say anything else?
Nope.
1)Den- An airport hubbed by 3 airlines with crap yield.
2)Mke - same as Den but with less people and 2 airlines.
No thanks, doesn't fit the business model, which is to stay in business.
Nope.
1)Den- An airport hubbed by 3 airlines with crap yield.
2)Mke - same as Den but with less people and 2 airlines.
No thanks, doesn't fit the business model, which is to stay in business.
Good points. That said, if JB intends to stay single into the forseeable future (i.e., no merger with a smaller or bigger airline), and growth is critical to Wall Street on a quarterly basis, can you tell me which West Coast locations could serve as potential places for future growth (i.e., no slot constraints like at LGB)?
West Coast is a huge, untapped market for JB - even with its LGB mini-hub. Seems like DEN could provide a place to grow with fewer slot considerations (and acquiring F9 would reduce competitors by one). I ain't making predictions - it just seems like LAX, PHX, LAS, SFO, SEA, SAN and PDX don't offer much in terms of capacity growth opportunities. Maybe ONT (not many slot constraints) could work IF West Coast growth is important? Who knows....![]()
jetblue starting the process of getting rid of the 190's???
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/20/us-embraer-curado-idUSTRE75J16N20110620
atleast stopping deliveries maybe?
wonder if this is in anticipation of an Airbus Announcement soon for 321s or 319s? Or maybe to bargain with Embraer?
Interesting quote from Dave during the new airbus order
"The E190 is performing very well as our new, shorter-haul market aircraft, often serving to build the demand in the market for eventual up-gauge to our A320," Mr. Barger said. "We are now at the point where the balance between frequency and capacity is tipping in favor of capacity, and we are exercising our most strategic asset—our order book—to better match capacity with growing network demand."
Yes but at what cost? A 98% dispatch rate is costing about 20% more than it should.