Eagle-ista
Well-known member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2003
- Posts
- 138
In a knee-jerk reaction to what was a light hearted thread, that I thought was hilarious, Skygoddess has been banned.
I suppose the avatar she chose was more vulgar than the ones of half naked women in provocative poses. I didn't think so (no, I'm not gay).
To the moderators;
If you are going to censor an avatar of a man in underwear, than I insist you ban all of the avatars of women in various stages of undress as well. This is just unfair, blatantly unfair. As some of the responses on the thread she started have said, it is about time for women to have a go at the avatar thing.
If you are going to ban men in suggestive poses, then ban the women in suggestive poses as well.
That is just bad form.
I suppose the avatar she chose was more vulgar than the ones of half naked women in provocative poses. I didn't think so (no, I'm not gay).
To the moderators;
If you are going to censor an avatar of a man in underwear, than I insist you ban all of the avatars of women in various stages of undress as well. This is just unfair, blatantly unfair. As some of the responses on the thread she started have said, it is about time for women to have a go at the avatar thing.
If you are going to ban men in suggestive poses, then ban the women in suggestive poses as well.
That is just bad form.
Last edited:
