Lear70
JAFFO
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2003
- Posts
- 7,487
The truth is that A/M (via B/M) has a pretty quick timeline once ONE of the parties files for arbitration.Wow!!! You know what our MC wants/needs to do and you also know how 50% or our pilot group will vote!! Read your post before you hit the submit button you moron. Have fun hanging around Guadalupe Holdings at your new pay rates....you might be there for a while.
Additionally, Guadalupe won't be around very long. It's a shell holding corporation to make the final transaction occur in the same state for tax purposes (that's all in the public filings). PCL covered it earlier in the thread...
What I *THINK* Dicko was saying (and I kind of said the same thing in my post above), was that it's going to be a heck of a tightrope for both MC's. They BOTH have to bring something that will pass vote with BOTH pilot groups, or it's going to arbitration. If one group thinks the MC's SLI solution is "unreasonable", it *COULD* result in something *WORSE* from an arbitrator.
That goes BOTH ways; could be worse for you, or it COULD be worse for US, that's the risk with an arbitrator; you never know what they're going to do.
It's in our best interests to keep control of the SLI outcome, but that's going to require some give-and-take. If BOTH sides can't do that and it fails member ratification at either carrier, it *WILL* go to arbitration. That's not a slam, just a statement of fact.
As I've said, I hope it can be avoided, for everyone's sake.
Last edited: