Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Do you have the fuselage tanks installed? We don't and just for grins, I ran the profile for our plane (a Classic) and we would have done the trip in 5:21 using .76 across the board using this mornings winds and temperatures aloft. It showed us getting into LAS with right around 1,500 pounds. If you fly the thing at much below .76 you start "pushing" at lot of air because of your AOA. .30 on the indexer will pretty much put you on the money.capnflyright said:We fly S/N 52 which is an SP model. Trip today was FOK (Westhampton) to LAS (Las Vegas). With 55-60 kt. avg. winds we did the trip in 5:55 and had 1500 pounds reserve. Avg burn was 1325 pounds per hour. We flew it at .71 and step climbed to 430 using the optimum range chart. 3 adults and 150 pounds of bags. Could have flown longer, but LAS starts you down 200 miles out.
Makesheepnervus said:Sled; I found the same thing to be true with our old classic, .76 or .77 seemed to yeild the best results, anyting less just resulted in a longer trip with no better reserves at the destination.
Likewise I would find cruising at .78 vs .80 typically only added 4 or 5 minutes to a trip, but saved hundreds of pounds of fuel.
I found it interesting that if you check the buffett margin charts the best margin for typical weights and altitudes is found at approximately mach .78 to .79 .