Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

ICAO Approach Clearance

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

ratvis

Member
Joined
Jun 23, 2006
Posts
12
While proceeding directly to the the IAF, the center controller issued a descent clearance to FL060 aprox 80 nm from the field. About 30 nm from the IAF we were 'cleared for the VOR DME approach, report final, QNH 1015'. The altitude depicted over the IAF is 3000' with a descent to 2000' once established outbound before a descent to the MDA once established inbound.

In the States an approach clearence is acompanied by a 'maintain XXX' until established...', this clearence was not.

My interpretation is that we were to maintain the last assigned altitude (FL060) until established on some segment of the approach...my co-pilot disagreed and wanted to continue the descent to 3000' before reaching the IAF.

Who was right?
 
Last edited:
In the States an approach clearence is acompanied by a 'maintain XXX' until established...', this clearence was not.

My interpretation is that we were to maintain the last assigned altitude (FL060) until established on some segment of the approach...my co-pilot disagreed and wanted to continue the descent to 3000' before reaching the IAF.

Who was right?

They don't have to state that in the states. In radar environments it seems they often state that, but non-radar it is hit or miss. If you were on an airway with a published MEA or MOCA, you can descend to that altitude (whichever is applicable) before reaching the IAF. If you were on a direct routing, then I would stay at 6000.
 
you are correct.....even if you are both unsure, what do you think the safe move would be?

start down to 3000? when you dont know if you can or not? Or stay at 6000 until you are sure.

Train that FO.
 
Thanks for the replies...we did the safe thing. Just wanted some other opinions before our next trip down that way!
 
In certain parts of the world you are expected to descend to the appropriate MSA altidude, when within 25 miles, and use that as your stepdown altitude.
 
Thanks for the replies...we did the safe thing. Just wanted some other opinions before our next trip down that way!

Your welcome.....like I said just do the safe thing and make the FO go sit in the corner until he get's his $hit together.
 
In certain parts of the world you are expected to descend to the appropriate MSA altidude, when within 25 miles, and use that as your stepdown altitude.

The AIM says the MSA is for 'emergancy use'. I could probably accept establishing a lower safe altitude based on an MEA or MOCA as previously stated, but I'm not sure about using the MSA.

Have you seen this written somewhere or is this based on experiance?
 
My interpretation is that we were to maintain the last assigned altitude (FL060) until established on some segment of the approach...my co-pilot disagreed and wanted to continue the descent to 3000' before reaching the IAF.

Who was right?

I'd say you were right.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top