acaTerry said:
It boils down to a basic lack of self worth. You do not make what you are worth you make what you can negotiate. Many people on here bitch about regional salaries and then in the next breath complain about so-called "mainline pigs" who actually fight for a decent wage instead of this 20-35 dollars/hour crap. The fact is programmers seem to understand that they are worth something and refuse to settle for sub-standard wages. There's your answer. We talk big and then settle for sh#t.
FINALLY!! Thanks for being the ONLY person to answer the darn question!
Mesa, ACA, AWAC, SKW, just about everyone did it. At ACA, the TA got signed, where's the growth? I'll tell you all where....it's at Mesa, it's at TSA...
See now? You guys new to this biz, please stop giving in to every lie and scare tactic thrown at you. It's kind of like a CA at UAL once told me (he was ex-EAL): "sometimes you have to do what you have to do. If the cookie crumbles....get another cookie out of the jar". (You can get another job). Stop the speech about paying the bills if I lose my job, etc. So you may have to actually work again for a while, but you WILL get a job flying again. I know this is a horrible thought for some of the younger pilots out there who think their summer job driving pizza was hard, but....
You guys (those who give in ) are the reason things are going Tango Uniform. Until the companies see pilots with ball$ again, it will never change.
B1900DFO is the first person to hit the point. You made money before you got to the airline biz, so stop screwing those who came up the hard way and are trying to improve it. Show your worth. Those RJ's are killing the mainline pilots, that's bad enough. But letting them kill us too b/c you'll fly for peanuts is even worse.
Dude, you probably just opened up a massive pandora's box with that last paragraph. When I was non-revving, you know how much sh*t I caught from mainline CSR's, especially from those that were displaced out of former mainline stations?
After thinking about it, reality hit home. Those jobs that were paying $20/hr were being replaced by jobs that were paying half of that, and less to start. Those with 20 years at UA were being bought out and starting over at half of the pay. They were "new-hires" with twice the experience of the more "senior" supervisor. I had met some people from the BHM station that had gone through three companies in three years -- UAL, Whisky, and finally ACA. So are you trying to say that since you got yours from somebody else (former mainline routes) that somebody can't take yours?
The post about negotiating was correct. Your problems as pilots are two-fold: You don't negotiate for yourself (a programmer does) and you are very replacable.
The problem with a collective bargaining agreement is that you personally have little say in how the agreement is worded. In fact, somebody else generally represents you in negotiations. THere is no guarantee that your negotiators are negotiating what is best for YOU. There are all kinds of little things that I could go through if you believe a one-size-fits-all contract actually makes everybody happy. You might have special skills, but if you're the only one that has them, your negotiators won't do anything to help you.
The second is that you are expendable and/or replacable. Don't believe me? What if I told you pilots should switch to a merit pay system and that better pilots should make more money? How would you set your benchmarks/baseline? Are you going to count superficial factors like how often somebody is late to work? How about trivial stuff in the cockpit, like how far off altitude or heading you got? Are you going to say that somebody who holds altitude +/- 5 feet is a better pilot that somebody who can do it +/- 10 feet? What if you have to shoot an approach to minimums at night when tstorms are rolling through? How are you going to tell the pax that the PIC is a "B" PIC and that the FO is just off of IOE, and that you hope you make it? You don't. You're all trained to a standard.
You and I both know the entire system is set up on a pass/fail basis. You take an oral, you pass or fail. You take a checkride, you pass or fail. Again, you are all trained to a standard that you either pass or fail.
Tell me you have some degree of specialization. What do you have that the others don't? Nothing. A pilot is a pilot. How many aircraft you've flown and how may types you have is irrelevant the minute you set foot in class. You call out sick, what happens? They get another pilot. Your 747 type means nothing in a CRJ. They'll furlough you with or without that type rating. They won't miss Terry, because whatever he can do, so can somebody else. My experience in computers means something -- if I don't like my current job, I quit and go find another one, most likely with a pay raise. I challenge you to do that as a pilot. Do you think the ex Midway guys got a break because they could fly a CRJ? No, except for a shorter training class. But they get paid the same as you.
There are tons of people in line to take your job. That means management will not have a shortage of employees, and they can put them on the line as fast as they can be trained. That lowers the bar even more, because they can hand out the jobs to the cheapest bidder.
Flame me all you want for this, but I will never go to a regional unless I already have deep pockets. Why? Because you guys screw each other in contract negotiations. You piss and moan about standing up for yourselves, but if you lose that gamble, you go junior at another airline. The only way in h*ll I would do that is if I were going to a better airline. If I'm out a job, so are many others, and the competition will be stiff. So, I can't blame a guy for wanting to hold onto the job that he has and sells out his boyz because he can't afford to gamble. I have a lot of respect for the Comair guys who struck. They weren't striking for better pay, they were striking for respect and acknowledgement that Comair is now the airline people expect to retire from. If I had the money, I would have sent money to the strike fund.
You pay $30k on top of college for your ratings. You spend 2+ years making $8/hr flight instructing. You go to training and make $200/wk. You sit reserve for 1+ years making 75 hr/mo at $21/hr. It's 4 years, and you still can't afford to pay your college loans. And then you have to go through half of that again when you get a new job? It's really tough to figure out whether or not it's worth it.
I know. You love to fly we all do. I'd do anything to fly and not pay the flying bills. I'ts not work -- it's flying. It's the greatest job in the world. Please god, don't make me do something else for a living. I'd give my left nut to keep this job. Please don't furlough me, I don't know what I'll do if I can't fly. I'll take a pay cut if I can keep this job. Excuses, excuses. Most people forget that at the end of the day, what you think is fun also pays the bills.
The number of people who voted in that TA disgust me. I'm not disgusted that it passed, but at the number of people who voted it in. It's been said that in any contract negotiation, that a 51% approval indicates that the contract was the best for both parties. How so? At 60+ percent, that means enough people were satisfied with it, that management could have negotiated for LESS. Each time management got something, they'd lose a few approvals. Do that until you reach 51%. Yes, I'm aware that it doesn't work that way, but better research on management's part would have yielded a more concessionary TA that would have passed. If I were management and I got concessions passed at 95%, I would not be happy, I would be pissed that my negotiating team didn't get more.
Oh, and btw, a lot of computer people I know fly for a hobby. I know few people who fly for a living and program for fun. I will choose the airline I work for. If I don't get the one I want, so be it, I'll take a job paying $100k+ per year (ATC) and buy my own friggin' airplane. I ain't so desperate that I'll fy for peanuts.