This maybe old news, but this morning on the CBS Morning News, they interviewed a couple who are part of a group trying to get some "passenger bill of rights" passed in Congress after flying on AA and being held on the tarmac in Austin TX (after being diverted for Wx) for 9 hours, supposedly until a gate could be assigned and opened up for them.
So, my question as a bugsmashing general aviation type is....
With passengers experiencing health issues, and starting to riot in the back....
...why couldn't/wouldn't a captain declare an emergency (albeit on the ground) and evacuate the plane there on the tarmac after a certain amount of time?
He/she had to be just as frustrated and upset with the lack of attention from the gate.
Nine hours seems ridiculous and I can understand passengers being upset and even wanting to file lawsuits.
All AA management would do/say is they awarded them about $500 worth of vouchers for future travel, and that "proceedures would be examined and changed in the future".
So, my question as a bugsmashing general aviation type is....
With passengers experiencing health issues, and starting to riot in the back....
...why couldn't/wouldn't a captain declare an emergency (albeit on the ground) and evacuate the plane there on the tarmac after a certain amount of time?
He/she had to be just as frustrated and upset with the lack of attention from the gate.
Nine hours seems ridiculous and I can understand passengers being upset and even wanting to file lawsuits.
All AA management would do/say is they awarded them about $500 worth of vouchers for future travel, and that "proceedures would be examined and changed in the future".