How not to land a Citation

[siucavflight]

This is wrong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06LBgfuxgA&NR

 

[seethru]

OK, now I've seen everything...

Anybody have more info on this? I'm curious if there was anybody in the plane that caused the engine to restart, or, hell, wow. Speechless.

 

[Metro752]

this is freakin awesome, thanks for posting! Danish registration.

 

[Smellycat]

Here ya go.

NTSB Identification: NYC05LA085.
The docket is stored in the Docket Management System (DMS). Please contact Records Management Division
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Sunday, May 15, 2005 in Atlantic City, NJ
Probable Cause Approval Date: 5/30/2006
Aircraft: Cessna 525A, registration: OY-JET
Injuries: 1 Minor, 3 Uninjured.
The pilot performed "a low pass" over the runway, and then touched down approximately 1,000 feet beyond the approach end of the 2,948-foot long runway, with a tailwind of approximately 10 knots. After touchdown, the airplane continued off the end of the runway, and subsequently impacted water. According to the Cessna 525A Landing Distance Chart, an airplane with a landing weight of 11,400 pounds required 3,000 feet of landing distance, in a no wind situation. With a 10 knot tailwind, the airplane required 3,570 feet of landing distance. The published airport diagram for the airport, was observed attached to the pilot's control column after the accident. A notation, which read, "airport closed to jet aircraft" was observed on the diagram. Additionally, the same notation, "Arpt CLOSED to jet traffic," was observed in the FAA Airport/Facility Directory. Examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical deficiencies. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
The pilot's improper decision to plan a flight to a runway of insufficient length, his improper in-flight decision to land on that inadequate runway with a tailwind, and his failure to obtain the proper touchdown point. A factor in the accident was the tailwind condition.
Full narrative availableIndex for May2005 | Index of months postamble();

Pilot was 61 and had 2500 hours total, 300+ in type, and had a Private SEL MEL HELI.

___________________________________________________

PILOT ERROR you think?

 

[Learsforsale]

NTSB Identification: NYC05LA085.
The docket is stored in the Docket Management System (DMS). Please contact Records Management Division
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Sunday, May 15, 2005 in Atlantic City, NJ
Probable Cause Approval Date: 5/30/2006
Aircraft: Cessna 525A, registration: OY-JET
Injuries: 1 Minor, 3 Uninjured.
The pilot performed "a low pass" over the runway, and then touched down approximately 1,000 feet beyond the approach end of the 2,948-foot long runway, with a tailwind of approximately 10 knots. After touchdown, the airplane continued off the end of the runway, and subsequently impacted water. According to the Cessna 525A Landing Distance Chart, an airplane with a landing weight of 11,400 pounds required 3,000 feet of landing distance, in a no wind situation. With a 10 knot tailwind, the airplane required 3,570 feet of landing distance. The published airport diagram for the airport, was observed attached to the pilot's control column after the accident. A notation, which read, "airport closed to jet aircraft" was observed on the diagram. Additionally, the same notation, "Arpt CLOSED to jet traffic," was observed in the FAA Airport/Facility Directory. Examination of the airplane revealed no mechanical deficiencies. The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:
The pilot's improper decision to plan a flight to a runway of insufficient length, his improper in-flight decision to land on that inadequate runway with a tailwind, and his failure to obtain the proper touchdown point. A factor in the accident was the tailwind condition.
Full narrative availableIndex for May2005 | Index of months postamble();

___________________________________________________

PILOT ERROR you think?

I always hated Bader field. I always go there with the best intentions, and I have never had a good experience there.

I cannot imagine trying to land a CJ2 there. I landed a Katana there with a slight tailwind, and I had to use the full length of the runway!

 

[Photoflight]

"LOW PASS"


way to go buddy....anyone have any theories on the engine?

 

[CLR2LAN]

I always hated Bader field. I always go there with the best intentions, and I have never had a good experience there.

I cannot imagine trying to land a CJ2 there. I landed a Katana there with a slight tailwind, and I had to use the full length of the runway!

Ah yes, good ol bader field. I love almost clipping the casino roof tops for runway 29 (i think thats the number)

 

[Jetz]

Can U say unprofessional?

This is wrong
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V06LBgfuxgA&NR

Keep your video cameras handy, folks. The VLJ's are coming!

 

[Amish RakeFight]

...and so he STILL decided to land??!!

A review of the FAA Airport/Facility Directory for the Northeast U.S., revealed the following notation listed in the Airport Remarks section of the Atlantic City/Bader Field Airport entry, "Arpt CLOSED to jet traffic." Additionally, runway 11 was a 2,948 foot-long, 100 foot-wide, asphalt runway.

Additionally, the airport diagram for Bader Field, was observed attached to the pilot's control column after the accident. A notation, which read, "airport closed to jet aircraft" was observed on the diagram.

According to the Cessna 525A Landing Distance Chart, an airplane with a landing weight of 11,400 pounds required 3,000 feet of landing distance, in a no wind situation. With a 10 knot tailwind, the airplane required 3,570 feet of landing distance.

 

[CrimsonEclipse]

Keep your video cameras handy, folks. The VLJ's are coming!

I LOL'd

Alot more where that came from



CE