The poor old guy at UAL only got around 40M?
Yep, after raping the employee retirement funds, management saw fit to award $800 million in management bonus's and stock dividends if my memory serves me well.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The poor old guy at UAL only got around 40M?
I guess I don't understand how you blame lawyers and pols, but not the money men executives and business owners that bankroll them. Seems they are the root problem- along with a judicial and 1/2 the electorate that think money = speech and corporations are people.
The poor old guy at UAL only got around 40M?
That's what I was thinking. How can he make it on that? Does he still tip the valet, or does he have to Self Park? Embarassing.
Oh good lord-
Nice transition-
Obamacare? Really?
Do better and I might finish reading a post....
Btw, yes, glass steagal should never have been repealed- government ought to break up the banks and restore capitalism instead of the oligopolies that reign. In short, what good is a democracy if people do not use it?
Move to Somalia if you hate government so much. See how you fare.
Geez, where do you begin with this one. You really think it's ok for someone to have an earned benefit stolen from them? You really think $40, 000 is an acceptable retirement. You really think an airline pilot doesn't deserve a retirement better than that? I could go on, but your response reeks of envy and pettiness.
Geez, where do you begin with this one. You really think it's ok for someone to have an earned benefit stolen from them? You really think $40, 000 is an acceptable retirement. You really think an airline pilot doesn't deserve a retirement better than that? I could go on, but your response reeks of envy and pettiness.
Thanks Ty. Your right. Just a little sacrasm Dan, not to worry.
I thought no one could be that stupid.
I never understood why creditors were willing to take less than 100% in a bankruptcy yet give the management team (often the same people who were running the company when it went bankrupt) equity that should be theirs. I can understand it in the case of labor because labor needs to be persuaded to give up things that translate into huge cost reductions but what does the management team give up except stock options that THEY destroyed the value of? The management team gets to keep their employment agreements and usually gets retention bonuses during bankruptcy (and their retirement generally gets protected as well) as well as a sweetheart deal on exit. What a deal, you put your company into bankruptcy and come out smelling like a rose while the rank and file take all the hits. It's no wonder bankruptcy is such a popular business strategy in this industry, it comes with a "bankruptcy bonus." There's a perverse incentive if there ever was one.
I don't get why all the normal employees are expected to do a good job to earn their paycheck and remain employed but upper management needs special incentives and bonuses (in addition to their salary, benefits and perks) to do theirs. On top of this they have employment agreements so even if they do a crappy job and have to be let go they get paid large sums of money to leave. These guys get bonuses to get hired, fired, if the company does well or poorly and if the stock goes up or down and the unions get accused of having an entitlement mentality.
As long as the Bush era tax cuts are extended to the ultra-wealthy, this will all work out in time. Us bottom feeders will surely benefit because guys like Horton are job creaters.
Too bad you're not willing to see the valid comparison. I knew you'd have trouble with the Obamacare example, that's ok though, partisans will always be partisans. Carry on.
OK I'm not going to fall for it twice!![]()