TreeTopFlyr
Member
- Joined
- Aug 19, 2003
- Posts
- 14
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
turbodriver said:I'm sure you were saying that during the two years it took you to upgrade too right?
ReverseSensing said:If Yank McCobb could "fix" the contract he says he dislikes so much, and an F.O. stayed in the -200 by choice until he could upgrade to CA (maybe wanted to live in Seattle), he would still be making -200 pay after 6 years. However, under the current actual contract, a 6-year -200 F.O. would be making CRJ F.O. pay.
Icelandair said:Getting jet pay would be nice, but not all of us were lucky enough to be placed in the jet. They would have to get rid of the whole thing that makes it impossible to change planes, so those of us on the 200 don't get stuck with 200 pay for 6 years.
KCPilot said:As an outsider to the airlines I'm an ART- Air Reserve Tech (aka full time Air Force Reservist). So my question for you regional guys (and think hard about this) is would you like to sit in front of a computer for 40+ hours a week, getting so much management BS in that time and fly once a week in addition to those 40+ hours (so 48+ hours a week) for a 3.5 duration, and have to put in an additional 8 hours of work and make 75K a year OR fly the line a Horizon?
QXbuzzard said:At this point in the game, changing the pay structure and aircraft bidding policies would be foolish. There would be a lot of people trying to make changes and would I want someone junior to me to start making 7 dollars more an hour than me because he or she is in the jet? No way.
Yank McCobb said:A typical response. If you want to make the extra 7 dollars an hour, then you would have the option to bid over if your seniority would hold it. You would do like everyone else. Decide what is more important to you...the extra 7 dollars and the QOL that goes with bidding the jet, or the $$ and the QOL where you are now. But you are right. Why change anything that would benefit the masses...you have yours, right?? This line of thinking is why that contract exists today.
Yeah, I said I was done with this subject...and this time I really am. I just wanted to point out a PERFECT example of why things are the way they are. And the solution, instead of working to make things better, is to tell those who don't like it to quit. Yep...a PERFECT example of what is wrong.
Icelandair said:That would work fine if they started everyone in the 200. But why should a snot nosed kid whose father knows someone get jet pay for 4 extra years just because he got into the jet before someone starting on the 200 even gets the option to bid over?