RedRum
Well-known member
- Joined
- Apr 22, 2008
- Posts
- 179
But you see, that's the point. ALPA should remain a neutral third party because they have a merger policy. The policy should set the ground rules for how the merger should be accomplished but why in the hell should the ALPA leadership decide who is entitled to what?
Thanks for the comment. In theory, yes, ALPA should not be deciding which party to favor. We have a merger policy that allows for binding arbitration if both sides cannot come up with a negotiated settlement. (DAL / NWA) This was the end game from the start.
I agree with FDJ2 about the fact that we would not have our JPWA or the SLI delievered had we not agreed to binding arbitration. But here is the issue. If both pilot groups are going to go to binding arbitration and we cannot agree on a negotiated settlement, why have a friggin union? Why pay union dues?
I will gladly pay an assessment to pay for lawyers who will negotiate on my behalf. I am not trying to sound like one of those whiny bee atches at the teabagger party, all I am trying to say is I am tired of having my union dues syphoned away only to end up paying for more lawyers to do a job that ALPA cannot, and will not do.
We have a lot of talented volunteers here at ALPA that do good work. Take for instance the CIRP, Safety, and Security (if I left a few out, I apologize in advance) We could easily pool those resources with a pilot group of 12,000 pilots! I just can't be happy about the way our union dollar is working for us right now. Again, no leadership when it boils right down to it. A lot of guys on FPL who are greasing their skids and playing the political shell game.
I would say a group of 12,000 pilots is a darn good lobby. Even better, one set of goals and one agenda which includes furthering the careers of Delta Air Lines pilots. Period