Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

hmmm

  • Thread starter Thread starter RichO
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 12

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
Oakum_Boy said:
"
No it doesn't; college teaches you to think critically, organize and prioritize your thoughts and actions. It also helps if your writing and math skills are developed above the high school level.

And sometimes 4 years of college even brings writing and math skills on a par with the high school level. And I heartily agree with you on the thinking, organizing, and prioritizing thing you learn there......

"Ok guys it's almost last call, who wants another pitcher?"

"Maybe we should go over to the River's Edge, I just remembered it's ladies night and everyone's probly pretty wasted"

"We'll never make it in time, hey we're out of beer back at the house and the stores are gonna close!"

"&$@#!"

"%#*x!!"

"%#$#@!!!"

"Ok", (thinking quickly...critically... through the beer fog, organizing and prioritizing) "You two get over there and tell every girl you see we're having a party and find a ride back. We'll head out right now and get a keg, wine coolers, and some Everclear. We'll meet back at the house in an hour. Yeah....Paaaaarty!"........
 
Looking4Traffic said:
REGIONAL FA:

Do me a favor.

Read my last posting again. Then ask someone to come in and read your response to my posting.

If that person agrees that you make any sense at all, then I promise I will try to understand what you're talking about.


you're right, you used two FO's and I just managed to process FO vs. captain. That is, by all means, my mistake.


The $1.62 makes sense, except as I said, the person taking money from passengers in a regional field isn't the person paying the crews.


(and unfotunately, the ones in the back think that their $250 is insanely high. I had a pax throw it in my face that they paid $200 round trip and that they deserved more than what was offered. YOu'd be suprised how penny pinching they are even when it's just another $1.50. They'd start doing the math and come up with "That's $100 a flight more that they're making, they don't spend that!!!!" even if you showed them the crew and handed the pilot the money in front of them...

there's theory and there's reality.

In theory, communism is an ideal form of government. In theory...
 
Don said:

And BTW, just as we might infer that someone with no education does not value it,....

Of course if you do indeed infer this, it's wholly your own (not "we" as you put it), and an inference that has certainly not been supported via any logical means. You have no facts to base this on. Now, if you charge ahead and try and bolster what has now essentially become a false premise through the use of yet another unproven inference by pretending the aforementioned is axiomatic...well....now you've just compounded your anti-Aristotlean sins! So if I let your primary statement pass by unchallenged, the danger is that you won't be able to resist the temptation to create and put forth a hypothesis based on false premises that in the end amounts to nothing more than a enormous heap of Ivory Tower horsesh1t.
 
RichO said:
Ok. let me try this again........how does everyone feel about the current path of the industry????? Does anyone have any suggestions on what might help the industry in the right direction??????

Current path of the industry = SCARY

Disclaimer: This is only my opinion, flame away if you must but it's just my worthless opinion.

What might help this industry??? Couple of things in my opinion. Let United and USAir die already. This is a very harsh thing to say and even harsher for the govt to do. But......It would help the industry out tremendously, there are too many airlines producing the same exact product right now, not good for supply and demand. Finally get rid of the JetBlue's, Airtran's and Southwest's of the industry. While making nice profits right now each one is single handedly bringing down the rest of the industry slowly but surely. For Christ's sake JB is charging $79 one way from JFK to FLL. $79 !! It would cost more if you rode Greyhound. How can anyone, majors or regionals, compete with this???
 
How about a tip jar at the front of the aircraft. The announcement can go something like this,

"....and if you enjoyed the flight and safe landing, please don't forget to show your gratitude to the starving crew. It will be greatly appreciated."

I'd say we can easily get the $1.62, and maybe even more. Truth is, we are in great supply, and there are D!PSH!TZ that will fly for nothing. Until we fix that , nothing will change. The public does need to be educated!!!!!
 
The FMS is MUCH easier. And yes I have managed to listen to ATIS, get a clearance, read it back AND put the flight plan in ALL at the same time.

Where? I'll bet it wasn't at PIT, IAD, JFK, EWR, LGA, PHL, ORD, etc. You are conspicuously quiet about the other tasks at hand in my challenge.....

And something else I ask you Mr. Intelligencia Computer Man, How can you compare the task of computer programming in a free-time environment to SCHEDULED airline flying? Or to the guy flying boxes in a half-fixed old crate of an airplane in hardball IFR all alone?

I have a working knowledge in C, C++ and C#. It is mathematically logical how code is entered. My brother in law has a curriculum vitae of languages and code that make you look like a TRS 80 student and he is the first to admit that not only is advanced flying (something you aparrently have yet to experience) more demanding, but also that it takes a more level-headed type of approach. If you are having a tough time with your programming, you go and take a break or even call it a day. If we are having a tough time with storms, ice or whatever, we can't just take that break and wait until we feel ready to face it.

You're "howl monkey" or whatever you call it...so you can teach someone to pass a commercial checkride...Big Deal! I've given some 3000 or so hours of dual-given and one of the things I've learned from it is this-----the commercial pilot license teaches NOTHING about being a COMMERCIAL pilot. The commercial pilot checkride is nothing more than an advanced private pilot checkride. I think a better gauge of skill is the pass rate of Instrument students. After all, instrument flying is the heart and blood of professional flying.
Professionalism is something that has to be developed form the outside of flight training, and frankly, it looks to me like you have a long way to go.

I agree with you in theory that we need to make the positions harder to get, but you will not like my reasons why or how. I think we need to make the job requirements higher. Raise not the license requirements with useless things like a college degree (I have one--so stop in your tracks), but rather raise the entry level requirements. 2000 hours to get an airline job. Since we have been seeing 1000 hour pilots coming in and upgrading in 1.5 years, we get things like this high-schoolish message board. Maturity comes through taking your knocks on the way up, not from getting something because you THINK you deserve it. My 5 year old child is capable of that. PROVE you deserve a job and EARN the respect of your peers.

In summary, the reason we get lousy pay, lousy work rules, and less respect for what we do is this: We bring it on ourselves. People like you, Don, who have such wisdom to bestow on people when you are NOT EVEN THERE YET. People who got the job fast and easy, and as a result of this have little self respect or respect for their position BECAUSE THEY GOT IT EASY. They feel that they deserve the equivalent of fry-cook pay to fly a $28,000,000.00 jet. Why? Because they did not EARN that job. They made money in computers, and so they get the job pretty easily compared to the guys who got it by earning it. Who do I have more respect for? The guy who was a CFI and flew his rear-end off at starvation wages, trying to get any little bit of information that he can, then flew freight for a year or two and THEN got into the regionals? Or the guy who made his money in computers, then decided to fly because "it looked like a fun career" and was LUCKY enough to get in the industry while it was in a hiring mode (all the while telling everyone who IS in the aviation profession how stupid and unworthy they are because programming is so hard)? Who do you think LOVES flying more and will do do their utmost to keep the airline profession respectable and lucrative?
I think you know where you fit, Don. Please, try to LEARN about this field before you go and make it worse. You have a few hours, but in terms of being a PROFESSIONAL, you need some work.
 
Last edited:
What about b-pay scales for two years for new hire fo's?
 
Educate the newbies before they reach the line. Aviation students should be taght management stradegy and be required to read Flying the Line.

Have programs for pilots to switch airlines without having to start at the bottom. Before you freak over this, allow me to explain. Training costs the company a lot of money. If CA's or FO's are leaving for better pay the employer will be forced to have attractive salaries to keep training costs down. Arrangements could be made between various pilot groups for transfer. It's a potential alternative to a strike.
 
Anger issues Terry,

Like I said, maybe its just hard for YOU to listen to ATIS at a busy airport, get a clearence, taxi, load the flight plan and make a call on the PA at the same time. And imagine there is a checklist to complete at the same time! And I suppose you might also find it difficult to keep track of time while you are doing all that, but for me, its not so difficult. You might also find the two to three hours of watching the autopilot on light challanging, but again, a lot of folks don't.

Now we might agree on the hours issue, I think the problem starts with 250 hour CFIs.

But the REAL problem is, any idiot can get a job as a pilot and be successful at it. And like I've said before, 99.99999% of the time, it won't matter that an idiot was at the controls.
 
sbav8r said:
Educate the newbies before they reach the line. Aviation students should be taght management stradegy and be required to read Flying the Line.

I agree...although I'd say Flying the Line vol. 2 and Hard Landing might be more timely and easier to read. All three are quality books that should be MANDATORY reading for all new pilots.


As long as CFIs are paid $9.57 (my summer wage) to instruct, they are going to bail to a job flying cargo in junk twins for $60/night.

As long as people fly cargo in junk twins for $60/night, people are going to bail to be a 19 seat turboprop FO for $18/hr.

As long as people *think* they might upgrade quickly, people will fly as a 19 seat turboprop FO for less than $21/hr or an RJ for less than $27/hr into their second and third year.

As long as people are willing to fly as an RJ Captain for $45/hr, they are going to bail to be an A320 or B737 FO for $55/hr.


Each step is a jump to better pay and better equipment, but what is the total cost to our profession? MY humble opinion is this - if you want to improve this profession, every level of aviation needs to start paying people a living wage, not a slave wage in the name of "building time".
 
Come on guys we all need to lighten up a little.....I took Don's post as a funny little anticdote. We all need to understand that this job is not hard....just like computer programming is not hard...it is all challenging but in different ways. I would not say flying for ACA is a hard job..it is challenging but no more challenging than those guys hanging off the 495/95 bridges welding iron together. Nor is it harder than the guy who has to load the bags on board the airplane in a 95 degree day, and you sure can not say our job is harder than the CS agents who have to deal with all the passengers at the terminal(you could never I repeat never get me to that). We all have challenging jobs in different ways and we all deal with those challenges in different ways also. I personally have no problem with multi tasking, in fact I can get ATIS setup the approach and get the new V speeds while listening to the latest ball game scores (for the passengers of course) on the ADF without missing a beat. Now is it hard, maybe yes maybe no but is it challenging........you bet.

Terry-

Raising the min hours to get a job is a worthless adventure. Who is more of a valued crewmember a 2000 hour CFI with 1500 hours of Dual given or a 1000 hour single pilot no autopilot freight dog. Adding hours to become an airline pilot is no different than adding a college degree to becoming an airline pilot. The problem we have in my opinion is too many young naive kids who are willing to sell out the industry for a chance at the majors and the big oney. We as an indusrty need to get the kids when they are young and explain how the system works.
 
SaladShooter,
I respectfully disagree with you on the hours issue. What we are talking about is not an issue of quality of hours, but quality of character.
Classic examples here:

800 hour "I want to fly a jet" guy. Thought process when contract comes up: "I love flying jets, in my 800 hours of Cessna and Piper time I know all about airlines because I read it on the computer---I'll do it for nothing, it's easy". Result: 19.00 per flight hour year one, 19. 98 per hour year 2.

2000 hour " I have been doing this for years" pilot. Thought process when contract come up: "I've busted my rear end for years, darned if I take it in the rear again". Result: 21.22 per hour year one, and 34.74 per hour year 2.

I think we know the airlines I am talking about, and I think we know the difference in competitive minimums we have between them.

It's not about how "hard" flying is. It's about the responsibilty you have, the road you must travel to get there, and the professionalism you need to possess on the job. Unfortunately, I see more and more people like Don out there, who:
a) have no idea what they are talking about and
b) pi$$ all over those of us who worked hard to get where we are and have it taken away because of little self-appointed experts who wh0re themselves out and enable the bar to be pulled down lower and lower.
To require higher minumums will keep the bar up by having people who will expect pay and rules that go equivalent to what it took to get to be an airline pilot. Look what we regional pilots have done to the majors by having all these RJ's: Majors are declining while LCC's and regionals are taking over the world. Now staff these RJ's with low time easy-road pilots who will do it for nothing and what is going to happen? You guessed it---lower pay, fewer days off, and lower quality of life.

Fact is, Don is shooting off his mouth about something he has no clue about. Teaching a pilot to do lazy 8's in a 2800 lb airplane is quite deiiferent from the level of professionalism and responsibility of being an airline pilot. It's got nothing to do with how "hard" it is. Don needs to sew his lips closed until he has really worked a real hard job to become an airline pilot. Sitting in a cubicle does not qualify. Be a CFI for 3000 hours, dig holes in the desert, fly boxes, do something where you EARN an airline job by working you rear end off. THEN LET ME HEAR YOU SAY A PILOT DESERVES THE EQUIVALENT OF FRY-COOK PAY.
I stand firm and unbending on this---a pilot is worth more.
 
So working for poverty wages for years builds more character then going through 6 or 8 years of school?

Flying an RJ is super complicated, so much so that 300 hour pilots can't make it through training and get a type rating?

If flying is sooo hard, and computer programming is fairly simple, then why not quit your job, get that easy masters or PhD and work as an application developer or researcher at a university? I get spring break off, a week at christmas, two months of annual leave and I make $75,000.00 a year.

I challange you to enter the IT industry and offer to do that job for nothing! The truth is, you can't! Most people can't. Thats why the job pays so darn well. At the end of the month you'd have nothing to show for your efforts.

I do agree you guys are underpaid, but you need to realize that flying a jet is not all that difficult and the reality is, with a little training most folks can do it.
 
Don said:
I do agree you guys are underpaid, but you need to realize that flying a jet is not all that difficult and the reality is, with a little training most folks can do it.

Tell that to the flushbacks at American Eagle.

You are missing the point. Flying an airplane and doing computer programming are both difficult tasks - in different ways. Computer programming and IT deal mainly with book intelligence...you can learn it just by reading about it. You cannot learn how to fly just by reading about it.

Why in the world do you think all these intelligent, succesful computer and businessmen millionaires who think its cool to own and fly a King Air or CJ with 500 hours are required to fly with a PROFESSIONAL pilot for such a long period after passing their required training at FSI or Simuflite? Must not be too easy...

The reason some 300hr pilots can pass a 121 checkride is they have had intense, structured training in transport-category aircraft systems and operations, often accompanied with transport category simulator experience. Its the same reason the Air Force can take somebody with just a PPL and within 300 hours give them a BE400A type rating.

Both flying and computers require intelligence and training, but the required intelligence and training for each is different. That doesn't mean one is better than the other, it just means they are different.

I have a friend who does IT work for Purdue and is a junior in the Aviation Flight program. He does the computer stuff on the side as a hobby, and just so happens to enjoy it as much as he is good at it. In the same vein, I have instructed IT professionals who couldn't fly their way out of a cardboard box on a severe clear day.

I for one applaud you for being successful in your career, but I hope you don't bring the superior intelligence ego you espouse here along into the cockpit. If I wanted to work with computers, I'd go to school for it.
 
SaladShooter said:
The problem we have in my opinion is too many young naive kids who are willing to sell out the industry for a chance at the majors and the big oney. We as an indusrty need to get the kids when they are young and explain how the system works.

Allow me to add my thoughts to this.

There's a list of people who have crossed the picket line. Make another.

Why not send an "unofficial" professional representative to all of the major aviation schools throughout the country once a year and have this person inform the students AND INSTRUCTORS: "Currently, Airline AAA, BBB, CCC, ZZZ, and Mesa :) are not up to professional standards with regard to first and second year flightcrew pay. Any of you youngsters who accept a job with said airlines after [insert calendar date here] will be forever brandished to this list, much like the infamous SCAB list. Should you choose to disregard this advice and accept employment with aforementioned airlines, you will have a difficult time obtaining employment with major airlines in the future. As soon as contracts are ammended to an acceptable level, we will remove these restrictions."

Please don't scream at me how this would be illegal. I know. Supposedly so is the SCAB list. I'm sure you college edumacated folks could make it work somehow.

And please again, don't squawk "supply and demand, supply and demand" like a parrott. We know.

Just a thought. Go easy on me now, especially about the Mesa remark. It was a joke.
 
So working for poverty wages for years builds more character then going through 6 or 8 years of school?

Generally Speaking, YES. Besides, most airline pilots HAVE been to school...and we don't need our computer to "spell check" for us.

Flying an RJ is super complicated, so much so that 300 hour pilots can't make it through training and get a type rating?

Once again, you have come through for me with an ostentatious display of ignorance. 300 hour pilots have failed left and right. Miserably. Ask anyone at Eagle, ask anyone at CoEx...need I go on? And, By the Way, they do NOT get a TYPE RATING...THAT COMES WITH THE CAPTAIN UPGRADE!

If flying is sooo hard, and computer programming is fairly simple, then why not quit your job, get that easy masters or PhD and work as an application developer or researcher at a university? I get spring break off, a week at christmas, two months of annual leave and I make $75,000.00 a year

Again I'll thank you for having a big mouth and a little brain. First, the "quit" option is SO DARN typical of you computer types. Spoken like today's weak, lazy, helpless public...If the going gets tough....quit. No sir, I will not quit. I love what I do, but I despise little pro$titutes like you who will GIVE AWAY what so many of us have worked for.
And your $75,000.....have you ANY IDEA how many YEARS!!!! we have to work before we can earn that? And little rich spoiled brats like you, because you have come to the airlines the EASY way are willing to give it all away? You just proved my point....the ones who come in from school, rather than from EARNING the job are the ones who will be the undoing of it all for those of us who earned it.


I challange you to enter the IT industry and offer to do that job for nothing! The truth is, you can't! Most people can't. Thats why the job pays so darn well. At the end of the month you'd have nothing to show for your efforts.

It must be terribly difficult...that's why it's going to 3rd world countries (like India), who, by the way, are doing it for....nothing (fractions of your pay).

I do agree you guys are underpaid, but you need to realize that flying a jet is not all that difficult and the reality is, with a little training most folks can do it.

"a little training"...please tell me this whole thread has been a joke. I find it hard to believe that someone can possibly be this stupid.
Look, we have been round and round, and all you have done is prove repeatedly what an ignoramous you are. What kicks it in is that you are so boiterous about it and you have NO CLUE what you are talking about. I will no longer dignify your inexplicable hostility towards pilots, nor your gross and obvious ignorance of the subject. Now put your Bill Gates pajamas on and go to bed. Good bye, good riddens, good night!
 
Last edited:
Being a Marine grunt, you have ridden in the back of our helos flown by a 350 hour copilot and a 700 hour aircraft commander.

Different strokes for different folks. For me, flying (both helos and jets) is easier than computer programming (it kicked my butt in college.) Likewise, my bud flew Cobras with all of the assorted training and then went to med school - he thinks med school is a good bit harder. It all depends on where your talents lie.

Wait a minute, I gonna say it now before somebody else does concerning salaries and the industry,

"SUPPLY AND DEMAND!"

As for the India people "doing IT for nothing", they do quite well considering India's per capita income and their cost of living. Its all relative. Same goes with airline salaries - what might be considered inadequate for someone living in a fashionable section of NYC would be considered very comfortable by someone in a small southern town.
 
Last edited:
Don said:
So working for poverty wages for years builds more character then going through 6 or 8 years of school?

Flying an RJ is super complicated, so much so that 300 hour pilots can't make it through training and get a type rating?

If flying is sooo hard, and computer programming is fairly simple, then why not quit your job, get that easy masters or PhD and work as an application developer or researcher at a university? I get spring break off, a week at christmas, two months of annual leave and I make $75,000.00 a year.

I challange you to enter the IT industry and offer to do that job for nothing! The truth is, you can't! Most people can't. Thats why the job pays so darn well. At the end of the month you'd have nothing to show for your efforts.

I do agree you guys are underpaid, but you need to realize that flying a jet is not all that difficult and the reality is, with a little training most folks can do it.

Oh, Don Don Don,

It's not a case of an RJ being difficult to learn..it's a case of learning it and then going on to fly it (or something like it) for thousands of hours over years and decades through the wx, bouts of fatigue, hassles at home, life-changing events etc etc, without accident, incident, or violation as part of a career. You see Don, there are no "Do-overs" in this game if you fxck up, unlike the IT world where you can try and try again.

And Don, 6-8 years of school? Big deal. Even after that big nursery school known as College, we are constantly being sent through school in one form or another..Initial, recurrent, transition, upgrade, Int'l Ops, Safety training, and that's not even considering the fact that this is aviation.....every time you fly it's part of continuing education. Don, how many times do you sit working IT and an government IT inspector shows up to watch you perform and potentially end your career? Happens all the time here.

Oh, and when the worst happens...when the your tool of your trade "crashes", you kick it, swear a little, and reboot. When ours does, it means those cute little computer thingys you work with that were part of our airplane are strewn about in the bottom of a smokin' hole. It gets to the scene of the crash a lot quicker than your Cessna.

When you've "been there and done that" for a few years and thousands of hours, get back to us, because you'll find that we don't get paid for "flying a jet" per se...the jet is just the tool of the trade. We are paid for exersizing sound judgment and making good decisions when using that tool...every single time we go to work.

Any weenie or fool with the money can go out and buy themselves a jet and get checked out with a few hundred hours.... but that doesn't mean they know how to "fly it", and in fact doing so might indicate they don't know much about flying in general. Any insurance company would surely tell you they don't, as reflected in their premiums for such a person, and looking at the ab initio types at the airlines creates a false impression you've apparently taken hold of. Those 300-hour types operate in the most regimented and standardized womb of aviation under the watchful eye of everyone, and certainly aren't making command decisions, nor will they for a long, long time. All they do is steer, and they aren't even typed.

I won't quit my job for IT work though. I don't think it would be hard to learn, but I do think it would be incredibly, agonizingly boring.
 
I get spring break off, a week at christmas, two months of annual leave and I make $75,000.00 a year.
But at the end of the day, you're still just a geeky little computer programmer in your cubicle.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top