Here it is - American Airlines TA

[pilot141]

pylut , for your outstanding contributions to this discussion so far, I've referred your posts to the Moderators. Call me whatever you want, but I appreciate being able to discuss things intelligently on this board. Name-calling does not fall into this category.

TWA Dude talking to guys on the line the two biggest problems they see with the TA are the length (6 years) and the lack of any meaningful pay increases (1.5%/year). If I kept my job with this TA (which I'm not), at the end of it (5/1/09) I would be making $1/hr LESS than I am right now. That assumes 6 years of longevity and keeping the same seat. Many people will suck up the pay cut and roll back to a different seat also.

That being said, I think that the TA will pass. Unfortunately, the TWU is sounding more and more like they will vote their agreement down. If an agreement doesn't pass, then all bets are off. Expect AMR to file Ch 11 the next day.

The fun is just beginning.

 

[NYRANGERS]

Sorry to hear about your TA guys. I hope things turn around soon.

I was wondering what your cap is with the new TA.

Thanks.

 

[pilot141]

NYRANGERS , if you're talking Eagle aircraft cap it's going to be 110% of mainline narrowbody aircraft (right now that would mean about 660 aircraft for Eagle). There is some language concerning 70-seat RJs, weights above 64,500#, and numbers of flights into and between hubs that will restrict this to something lower than 660 (at least that's what the union is saying). Who knows how it will ultimately shake out.

 

[NYRANGERS]

NYRANGERS , if you're talking Eagle aircraft cap it's going to be 110% of mainline narrowbody aircraft (right now that would mean about 660 aircraft for Eagle). There is some language concerning 70-seat RJs, weights above 64,500#, and numbers of flights into and between hubs that will restrict this to something lower than 660 (at least that's what the union is saying). Who knows how it will ultimately shake out.

Thanks for the info pilot141. I was refering to your hourly cap for pilots in a month. For example, at Delta we have a 75 hour cap on lines with pilots on furlough. I believe the TA raised yours to 78 hours.

I only ask because there is some talk of ours going to 85. This would be a terrible precedent if we allowed this in light of your 78 hours.

I wish all of you guys the best of luck and I pray for better days for all of us. You never know, things could get better almost as fast as they got bad. I wish all AA pilots good luck in the days ahead.

NYR

 

[pilot141]

OK, yes the hourly monthly max has gone up to 78 for lineholders. During the roadshow the union talked about trying to balance this- if we had gone to an 85 hour MMAX it would have meant an additional 1,050 furloughs. And since the hours still get flown by other pilots, the only cost advantage to the company was the health insurance, vacation and sick leave of the furloughed pilot. So when trying to come up with $660M in savings, a furloughee shoved out the door because of this was only worth (according to the company) $40,000. The union decided to try to save money in other ways rather than furlough guys and get almost no benefit for it.

When it could have been 3,500 furloughs I guess 2,500 doesn't look so bad.