Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Herb to the rescue!!

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

OakRBust

Still Lucky as Hell
Joined
Apr 6, 2002
Posts
259
Hopefully we can get this Flight Attendant contract into high gear!!



CEO Jim Parker made the following announcement at the Dallas Message to the Field on April 19 regarding an important issue that has been very prominent on the minds of Southwest Employees:

"As you know, we have been negotiating contracts for many years at Southwest Airlines. In fact, we have negotiated five contracts with various work groups just since 9/11. Throughout it all, we have had our differences, but we have always maintained our shared vision for the future of Southwest Airlines. For some reason though, the contract negotiations in which we presently find ourselves involved have become very personal and, therefore, have gotten off track.

"I have given the status of our negotiations quite a bit of personal thought and consideration about what I could do to get our negotiations back on track. I am concerned that we are in danger of losing the fundamental elements of civility, courtesy, and mutual respect that underpin our culture. Our shared goal must be to negotiate the very best contract we can for our Flight Attendants and for our entire Company–one that will offer a secure future both to our great Flight Attendants, and to all the rest of our outstanding Employees as well.

"In the spirit of Southwest Teamwork, of trying to always do the right thing for our Company, I have concluded that I should ask somebody else to assume the role of chief negotiator with respect to this particular contract, so that I might stand aside from that role. Fortunately, our Chairman Herb Kelleher has agreed to accept this assignment. I have every expectation that Herb will combine his universally respected intellect and business judgment and his well-known LUV for our Employees to move these negotiations forward. In taking this step, I hope that it will allow us to restore the civility and mutual respect that have traditionally surrounded our contract negotiations and which are so important to our culture and to the future of our Company. And I hope that it will allow us to remember that we are all on the same Team–the Southwest Airlines Team."

The Message to the Field audience of approximately 3,000 responded with several standing ovations in support of Jim’s Message, his goal of offering a secure future for each of us, and in appreciation for his hard work and dedication to our Company.


Cyaaaaaaa


Oak
 
Imagine that!!!

A CEO that knows when he had met his challenge... or is it a case of bringing in the big guns?:p
 
Wow, I find this very interesting. I do not agree with the way this has been handled as Jim Parker has now lost credibility with the workforce as a leader. It is kind of like trying to defend yourself against a bully and then calling in your mother.

It sounds to me like the FA's have them exactly where they want them because they know that SWA doesn't like to tarnish their wonderful PR. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
 
my 2 cents

I don't think he has lost any credibility. I have talked to many FA's and even some from their Union. For many reasons this work group and managment could not agree to much. Now i have seen some of the stuff put out by their Union. It was childish and very personal towards Mr. Parker. Not the company, but Mr Parker. If that would have been our Union I think the membership would have put a halt to the antics. I also saw a packet of the stuff put out by the company. Some of that was misleading also if you didn't read it well.. Retro pay ect. But the fact is they stuck. So why drag it out? It isn't good for the FA's and its not good for the company. Get it done and move on. It is now going to be Herb presenting the same #'s that are already crunched.
 
Hey, SWA folks...a recent DAL VP for negotiations (one, Mr Erskine) recently jumped ship. He is probably available to help out as a gun-for-hire. But then again, he may be busy counting his money from the SERP....thjat was supposed to keep him from leaving.
 
The FA's wont get away with personal attacks towards Herb. Thus they will be able to focus on the task at hand or be forced too. They will lose what fans they have if they start talking $hit about Herb.
 
<<Who's going to negotiate with the Flight Attendants when Herb's gone?>>

Good question. SWA could wind up like a Walmart of the skies. Remeber Sam Walton's humble begining and small town mentality? I remember how he never wanted to open a store that would negatively impact a community. Well, years later after he is gone look at Walmart. Now run by greedy CEOs with seemingly no regard for humanity -- or its employees. If I'm not mistaken Walmart is one of our nations largest employers and pays its employees so little. Let's not forget how much of it's merchandise isn't actually "made in the USA" as they would lead you to belive.

OK my rant is getting long... My point is that once the founders of a company move on, corporate vision can and often times change. Things have the potential of going south.
 
I have supported Thom McDaniel and the rest of my NT from the very beginning...still do.. but we have flexed our muscles and forced Jim to step aside but in the process we spent every last penny of our political capital. The time has come to go back to the table take a long hard look and what we really can get then take it and run.

I'm ready and willing to sign off on a TA somewhere comfortably between what the union wants to get and what the company wants to give. I think a 12 year top out is only fair but, I can live with 14. Sweeten the TFP pot a little and I'll gladly settle for substandard duty rigs or none at all. I recently started doing some F/A recruiting and I thought the hopefuls would cut and run when they heard what the starting pay is...some do. Most don't. A starting pay north of what we have now but south of jetBlue will still bring em in.

In the end, the very real prospect of a work action that could leave us all unemployed will send the silent majority with mortgages to pay and mouths to feed running into Herb's comforting arms at warp speed. The only question is do enough of my co-workers feel the same way I do and will my union leadership have to guts to eat a little crow and bring such a proposal to us. I think they do. They are smart men and women who have run one heckuva campaign and agree or disagree, done a better job of focusing and uniting the membership than any previous negotiating team. However, I think they know that if they're hanging their hats on painting Herb with the same tar and feather brush they used on Jim, we're all screwed.
 
Last edited:
TWU position variable

I reviewed the TWU website and noted that the union wants the best of all the worlds. First, I think the FA's deserve a bit better pay plan, but here is my point: TWU compares how they don't get paid for non-flight time, with all the associated work entailed during non-flight time, but then they compare themselves to ground crew/front office folks. Then they say they are the only ones who do not get paid during training, yet each and every pilot shows up happy to have spent near $10,000 to walk in the door. I was ammused that pilots get .15 cents more than FA's, so do we eat more?? Lets get the FA's a deal and press on with life, go Herb!
 
Re: TWU position variable

Outsidelooknin said:
I Then they say they are the only ones who do not get paid during training, yet each and every pilot shows up happy to have spent near $10,000 to walk in the door.

I think the real issue with training pay is that most trainees report to class with little or no savings and then graduate to an expensive coastal city, i.e. BWI or OAK. We are not employees until we graduate and employees don't get paid. That is a tough reality to overcome at the bargaining table. A suitable compromise might be offering to advance newbies a portion of their salaries right out of class with repayment handled via payroll deductions ala uniforms. That way the company doesn't have to actually "pay" during training and the newbies don't have to starve. The catch as how many would take the money only to wash out before we could get it back. On the other hand, I did not get paid for training and I survived. I tend to be a bit of a stickler for personal responsibility. Gather the facts, take a long hard look at your finances and if you can't afford it, accept that and wait until you can. As far as the money our flight ops have to spend to get on here. I can't even imagine what you folks go through. Hopefully, once you have your foot in the door you are able to realize a nice return on that investment.
 
Gutsy move on Parker's part. Opens him up to criticism that he failed but at the same time he realized that the negotiations had gotten personal and it was time to step aside in order to move forward.

Somewhere in the middle an agreement will be found. Keep in mind a great contract means both sides come out thinking they got hosed.

my $0.02
 
cargoflyr69 said:
If I'm not mistaken Walmart is one of our nations largest employers
It's the second largest employer. The US Government IS the largest employer in the USA.
 
SWAInflt said:
but we have flexed our muscles and forced Jim to step aside

This is exactly what they want you to think. We beat Jim. They pulled a good one and in the long run it will cost the company nothing. The contract will be signed, after all you guys hedged your bet that Jim was the guy who ruined Herb's empire. Herb WILL force the hand and you guys can't disagree with Herb now or you will lose faith with the silent MAJORITY. As I guessed last year when an F/A brought the company proposal to the cockpit, that + or - 2-3% is exactly what yor final contract will be.

A starting pay north of what we have now but south of jetBlue will still bring em in.

Yea but at JetBlue the F/A position isn't a career. They have designed it to be a 5 year position then you move on. (A direct quote from Ann Rhodes the head of H.R.)

However, I think they know that if they're hanging their hats on painting Herb with the same tar and feather brush they used on Jim, we're all screwed .

I can agree with you on that point 100%.
 
Last edited:
canyonblue said:
This is exactly what they want you to think. We beat Jim. They pulled a good one and in the long run it will cost the company nothing. The contract will be signed, after all you guys hedged your bet that Jim was the guy who ruined Herb's empire. Herb WILL force the hand and you guys can't disagree with Herb now or you will lose faith with the silent MAJORITY. As I guessed last year when an F/A brought the company proposal to the cockpit, that + or - 2-3% is exactly what yor final contract will be.

Only time will tell if Jim's ability to negotiate effectively or not has been impacted. I guess we'll know for sure when the next labor group steps to the table. Whether it was a calculated political move or not it is a huge gamble for him to let a labor group as large is this one "believe" they bested him. It is a dangerous precedent that could impact the way organized labor at this company negotiates for years to come. It has already cost the company. It has cost the company money, that could have been spent elsewhere if this had been wrapped up a year ago. It has has cost the company time and distraction that could other have been focused on making SWA a stronger competitor. No matter what, there is a cost.

Support for the smear campaign runs the gamut for vehement to passive to comletely counter There are well over 7,000 of us and and just like flight ops, we don't all think alike. Some of us are capable of drawing our own conclusions without help from TWU 556 or anyone else. But those of us who think that way are tough to spot. We're the ones that are too busy doing our jobs to sit in the cockpit and talk about the contract . Meet you back here when we've ratified a TA and we'll see how close your guess came to the final numbers. You just might be right and I'm good with that. If they get the details right, I'll be as happy as clam. But then again, I never expected to get rich doing this. Not even close. Give me a decent bump and leave my unlimited trip trades alone and I'm good to go.




Yea but at JetBlue the F/A position isn't a career. They have designed it to be a 5 year position then you move on. (A direct quote from Ann Rhodes the head of H.R.)

Do the jetBlue flight attendants know that they're short-timers? The ones I've run into are so happy there.. it's gonna take a crowbar to get them off the seniority list. If I were making the kind of money they are I'd feel exactly the same way. I think when B6 started out they envisioned their flight attendant corps being made up of college students and others "in transition" what they ended up with were a bunch of refugees from the majors. Short of having new-hires sign a document promising to quit, how could they possibly think people would leave B6 just when life starts to get good there?

I'd take alot of flack for "selling out the newbies" on the F/A boards for this but I would vote "Yes" for a TA with a $16 or $17 starting pay in a heartbeat. I started out earning much less and I survived. If anything a lower starting pay weeds out the fortune hunters. Keep the entry wage a couple of bucks below standard and you have a better chance of knowing that your candidates actually want to be at SWA, as opposed to just wanting a job.
 
Last edited:
SWAInflt said:
Do the jetBlue flight attendants know that they're short-timers? The ones I've run into are so happy there.. it's gonna take a crowbar to get them off the seniority list.

Maybe some JB pilots can chime in here but the way it was explained to me was that the F/A position is not long term ( as I pointed to the quote from Ann Rhodes). It may have changed, please correct me if I am wrong. Without a union there is nothing they can do to change this. I know some are coming up on 5 years, what is the status?

BTW, I still think the SWA F/A's do a great job day in and day out. I hope what ever comes down can make everyone happy, but that usually does not happen.
 
canyonblue said:
Maybe some JB pilots can chime in here but the way it was explained to me was that the F/A position is not long term ( as I pointed to the quote from Ann Rhodes). It may have changed, please correct me if I am wrong. Without a union there is nothing they can do to change this. I know some are coming up on 5 years, what is the status?

I was already working for WN when B6 hit the scene. I did some serious checking into the flight attendant position....alot of of us did. I think even then people had a very clear sense that jetBlue was not going to be just another start-up and the idea of getting in on the ground floor of something great was very tempting. We get giddy when the last row on a flight is empty so we can chill out(after the Customers are sufficiently fed and watered of course..... :D )...the idea of that backrow having LiveTV is enough to require a change of underwear.

In the end I decided to stay. I was to close to being vested to quit and by the time I was vested I had too much seniority to just walk away from.

If I remember correctly at the beginning jetBlue was recruiting flight attendants in 3 catergories. Like you said, I'm sure a B6er can give us the scoop but I think I'm pretty close.

FLIGHT ATTENDANT 2000

This was a 1 year contract marketed to college students taking a semester off or others looking for a short-term flying job.

FLIGHT ATTENDANT FRIENDS

This was essentially a permanent job share. Two people would interview together, get hired together and share the flying on a single line.

TRADITIONAL FLIGHT ATTENDANT CREW

This was the third category for potential crewmembers interested in just a plain old run of the mill flying job.


BTW, I still think the SWA F/A's do a great job day in and day out. I hope what ever comes down can make everyone happy, but that usually does not happen.

Thank You. It is always nice to know we're appreciated. I can tell you this....there is a small faction that will NEVER be made happy...they could be making 12 year captain pay and it still would not be enough. Personally, I think SWA can do better
than what is currently on the table...but they are much closer to hitting my sweetspot than they realize and I suspect I'm not alone. Alot of us are just ready for this to be over. One way or the other. Our lives are on hold. We don't want to make any major purchases because our financial futures and to a point jobs are a huge question mark. You can only live like that for so long.
 
Last edited:
SWAInflt said:
Do the jetBlue flight attendants know that they're short-timers? The ones I've run into are so happy there.. it's gonna take a crowbar to get them off the seniority list. If I were making the kind of money they are I'd feel exactly the same way. I think when B6 started out they envisioned their flight attendant corps being made up of college students and others "in transition" what they ended up with were a bunch of refugees from the majors. Short of having new-hires sign a document promising to quit, how could they possibly think people would leave B6 just when life starts to get good there?

That's EXACTLY what they did. Have a friend who is a flight attendant there, and although she loves it, she's year 2 of 5 and knows good and d*mn well that she only has a 50/50 chance of being rehired for another 5. Definitely one way to keep your F/A cadre young and cute which is what the business traveler has said they want.

I also believe the pilots have a 5-year contract as well, and also are just about the only airline I know of to not have a probationary period, they're full-fledged employees as of day 1, but there's no union to "protect" them. Should be interesting to see how both groups are handled when they hit year 5...

Good luck to you!
 
It is always nice to know we're appreciated.

I don't think it's a minority view to say that the F/A's are very, very much appreciated by the pilots at SWA, as well as the rest of the company. You guys & gals do a tremendous job with some long days and occassionally tough situations, and a lot of people (I among them) really admire what you do, and it is NOT a throwaway line to say that we hope you get a good contract, and soon. Hopefully Herb's entry will make that happen sooner rather than later.

I think much of the distrust and unappreciation (?) is directed not at the flight attendants themselves, but at some of the "leadership" of the union and the negotiating tactics & propaganda they've put out. Wanting to see you get a good contract and a fair contract and hopefully getting it quickly, is (as you probably well understand) not at all the same thing as suspending judgement of all that goes on, and after a while a LOT of pilots are seeing a pattern of duplicity in the TWU leadership's statements (both to the press & to the membership).

Recently, there was some suggestion of a notional "vote of no confidence" in Jim Parker among the F/A's. It was suggested in private discussions that maybe a confidence / no confidence vote in the union leaders & tactics would be more informative.

I hope Herb can get things unjammed & you all get a good contract soon. My opinion of the Flight Attendants, the People, that I fly with, is very high. My opinion of the F/A union leadership is very low. I'm sorry that the one is represented by the other, particularly when it looks like the agendas have significant differences.

Just a personal opinion, but one that I think is very close to the mainstream in the company.

All the best getting a good contract soon.

Snoopy
 

Latest resources

Back
Top