Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Guns in the Cockpit

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

gmbpilot757

Active member
Joined
Nov 10, 2002
Posts
25
Hey everyone-

I'm a student at Embry Riddle in Prescott. This is my first post, although I have been monitoring the forum for a bit...my buddy FalconCpt. got me here. Anyway I'd like to know what all you pilots for the majors think about "Gun's in the cockpit" policy? I'd like to get your opinions. This is all for a policy paper which I'm doing on Gun's in the cockpit. If you'd like to give me a little of info I would appriciate it. If you know any good sites for this subject I'd appriciate it a bunch.

Thanks ahead of time. If you'd like to email me as well that'd be great, [email protected]

Thanks again and fly safe...Godspeed!
 
Do a search on this forum. There have been several discussions about this subject. Go to the search ICON on the top of the page and type in "guns in cockpit." Hope that helps.
 
A recent poll of jetBlue's 511 pilots showed that 80% of the respondents disapprove of weapons in the cockpit. With the cameras installed allowing the pilots a good view of the cabin, our newest kevlar reinforced door and titanium deadbolts (the locking mechanism is only operable by the pilots), the need for arming the pilots is not considered necessary-- no one will bypass the locked door in flight. Furthermore, the addition of a weapon in the cockpit introduces many security issues. One other concept to consider is the training that will be required. Air Marshalls are required to hit something like 7/7 head shots to pass their final exam-- what will the pilot standards be? What happens if you don't meet the "standards"? One final thought-- if the weapon is stored in the cockpit, how will it be accessed in an emergency? Heck, the first person I'd probably shoot in the surprised moment as I retrieve the weapon would by my first officer!!!
 
BLUE brings up some great points.

Also, what kind of security is there for the weapon when the pilot is at the hotel for the layover? Or walking through the airport? I think pilots have enough responsibilities and things on their minds not to have to add this one on- one that certainly goes to the top of the list. It is difficult to get through security as it is- we always get stopped and wanded and searched.

There might be more incidents and accidents with the weapon than situations where it would be used to defend the cockpit.

I am sure many pilots, especially ex-military pilots, have had extensive experience with weapons. I know a lot of pilots that hunt and own rifles and such. But I don't think they belong up front. Just my two cents.
 
Well, we all have opinions, and I respectfully disagree with both of you guys.

Ever notice those little TCAS targets on your tail sometimes? They are usually in 2's and 3's, and they have the altitude squawk suppressed so you don't get an RA. You ever wonder what they're practicing for on your tail? Uhh Huhhh. LEt's face it, there are many ways to get a weapon on board an airplane, and I want my chance to defend the cockpit before I am blown out o f the sky by our very own military, for crying out loud.

The way that I look at it, with proper screening and training, the more weapons we can get in the cockpit the better. It is one hell of a deterrent . . . . . why try to hijack an airliner when it means you're probably going to be shot dead?

I see the guns being installed, like a PBE, in a locked, clear compartment. Check out the seal as a preflight item . . . if it is missing, the airplane is grounded until MX comes out and starts the ball rolling- MEL, cops, etc.

BTW, you already have some good weapons, in the form of a flare pistol (think flaming 12 guage) a fire extinguisher (temporary blindness, followed by a skull bashing) and, of course, everyone's favorite, the crah axe.
 
The info I'm getting, from people involved in the program is this. You will be deputized under the U.S. Marshalls service, justl like FAMs. You will have federal concealed carry credentials. You will carry your own weapon and be responsible for it, just like the FBI, FAMS, etc.
 
The other thing to note here is that this program has been passed into law, and neither the individual airlines or their representatives can over rule a pilot's participation in it. The Chief pilot may not like it, your cockpit mate may not like it, but once you're trained and certified, you can carry in the cockpit (unless the law is amended).

I hope that the people administering the program do set a high standard for both marksmanship and personal responsibility for the program. As anyone who has carried 24/7 for an extended period can tell you, it's a big responsibility and it can limit your day-to-day activities (no drinking, where do you stow it during PT, etc.). Maintaining a high level of shooting capability requires regular practice, so a participating pilot is going to have to be motivated and be willing to spend the bucks for ammo as well.

When I was OIC of special ops training school for the West Coast Marines, we took recon Marines and in about 3 weeks trained them to national standards in long and short gun discriminate shooting. While most were good shots with a rifle, most first-timers had never fired the SOC 45 or MP-5. We had a low attrition rate and very few safety drops (though we had some). It's a matter of focus, situational awareness and personal responsibility; things that I think most pilots are pretty good at.

A gun is a tool. It's neither good or evil in and of itself. Some people who are unfamiliar with weapons act as if they are the metallic equivalent of a p*ssed-off rattlesnake. Having spent most of my life around weapons, I assert that it just ain't so. It's an inert object, it's the person carrying it that makes it dangerous or not.
 
Guns and security screening

I figure that if I'm able to carry a gun through security maybe I'll be able to carry my little pair of scissors and finger nail clippers through as well. That alone would be worth the hassle of having to qualify and buy ammo. Maybe the screeners would leave us alone if we were packing heat!
 
I want to participate in the program simply so I can have a badge and never get another speeding ticket! Carrying the gun would just be an added bonus...

All jokes aside, this could be a very worthwhile program if administered and monitored properly. As a previous post stated, if the unthinkable happens again, a firearm may possibly make the difference between defending the flight deck to a safe landing or being shot down by the USAF.

I want as many defenses as possible against the bad guys.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top