Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Gulfstream Academy

  • Thread starter Thread starter hangar
  • Start date Start date
  • Watchers Watchers 11

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
here we go again.......


Dude, do a search for "gulfstream"....there has to be only a few hundred threads on it and they are all the same...
 
As moderator, I respectfully ask members not to start another Gulfstream flame war.

Hangar, search this site for all the info you need.

If4f
 
Gulfstream

On a side note I was recently hired by GIA as a FO. Im looking foward to my class date and getting out on the line.
 
I think they have an agreement to interview those candidates who are approved by the chief pilot.

My question is this: during that 300 hours of turbine experience, is the SIC paid a wage commensurate with industry standards, or is he paid from the money he paid into the program?

This smells like you-know-what....
 
Oh brother. I just saw the ads again n my Airline Pilot Careers Magazine:

ATA: DO YOU WANT TO BE AN AIRLINE PILOT???

TAB EXPRESS: MEN AND WOMEN WANTED TO SUPPLY THE U.S. PILOT SHORTAGE.

I'm pretty sure the SIC program through ATA and Ameriflight is a pay for training type deal. Amflight has rented out seats in their aircraft in the past which was merely people paying for a few hundred hours of turbine SIC time. :o
 
Here we go again . . .

ATA's "program" sure does sound like you-know-what.

We've beaten TAB to death. However, its stupid ads that proclaim a pilot "shortage" continue to slay me.

To save everyone time searching for that discussion, here's a link to it.
 
Unfortunately it's the magazines that are supposed to be "helping" us that are allowing false advertisements like that into their publications.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom