Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Great Article about United's "Drastic" Pay Cuts - Check It Out....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

On Your Six

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 8, 2004
Posts
4,507
UAL asks its pilots for steep cutbacks



Plan calls for longer hours, 12% wage cut

By David Kesmodel, Rocky Mountain News
November 24, 2004

Senior United Airlines pilots would have to fly more hours each month and be away from home longer under a sweeping cost-cutting proposal by the ailing carrier.

That change - as well as others proposed by United - could result in additional furloughs of junior pilots because the airline would gain productivity increases.

The giant carrier also has proposed contracting out jobs of pilot instructors at United's big flight training center in Denver, which could lead to furloughs.

Chicago-based United has proposed minimum wage cuts of 12 percent. The figure could rise if the pilots union does not agree to changes to work rules and scheduling provisions, such as the increase in flight hours.

The United branch of the Air Line Pilots Association released complete details of the carrier's proposal to its members for the first time last week, and the Rocky Mountain News obtained a copy.

The proposed cuts are so drastic that one might ask, "Why would anyone want to work there anymore?" said Bob Mann, an industry consultant in Port Washington, N.Y.

The airline, flying under bankruptcy-court protection for nearly two years, is seeking cutbacks from pilots as part of a plan to pare its costs by another $2 billion a year. It has cut its costs by about $5 billion a year, about half of which has come from labor concessions.

Denver's dominant carrier is asking the pilots group, the best-compensated of the rank and file, to provide $191.1 million in annual wage and benefit cuts and work-rule changes, or about 26 percent of the $725 million it seeks from workers.

The company also is asking all its unions for permission to terminate traditional pension plans, which would result in billions of dollars in additional savings and dampen the retirement benefits of active and retired pilots more than any other rank-and-file group.

United's pilots agreed to $1.1 billion in annual concessions last year, including pay cuts of 30 percent or more. About 2,100 pilots have been laid off since the 2001 terror attacks.

The company wants to negotiate the additional cutbacks by mid-January, which could help it step out of bankruptcy next year.

It will ask the bankruptcy court to impose concessions if negotiations fail.

United proposed increasing monthly maximum flight hours for pilots on widebody jets, such as the Boeing 747, to 95 from 85 and cutting their minimum monthly days off to 10 from 12. Pilots are capped at 100 hours a month and 1,000 hours a year under federal law, so pilots could fly at the monthly maximum rate for only 10.5 months.

The proposed changes would have a big impact on senior pilots' life-styles, many of whom fly to Asia and Europe, Mann said.

"If you figure they do four trips a month and spend a day getting to and returning from (the trip), that means exactly six days off in a month," he said. "You're going to have some very tired, frustrated people."

United pilots on narrowbody jets, such as the Boeing 737, agreed to raise their maximum monthly flight hours to 95 from 81 last year, and many say privately that the change has taken a toll on them and made the job much less appealing.

Other proposed changes by United:

A 12 percent wage cut, with 4 percent of it temporary. United also proposed being able to impose another temporary 4 percent cut if it would otherwise default on certain financing.

Replace pilot instructors at United's Denver flight training center with contractors. This could lead to furloughs because the United instructors would return to the cockpit, pushing out the least-senior pilots. United employs about 170 pilot instructors at the center.

Reduce vacation, sick leave and health care benefits. The vacation cuts could affect staffing and spark some furloughs.

The hodgepodge of wage-cut stipulations and work-rule and benefit changes reflects a lack of resolve by management about the kind of concessions it needs to return to financial health, Mann said.

"I just don't think they have very much confidence in their own business modeling, because they just don't know what they're asking for," he said. "They're asking for more, but they're not willing to say how much more with any finality.

"That tells me they really don't know where things are going from here. Perhaps that is an honest reflection of where they now think they are. In the past, they have been overconfident."

Union spokesman Captain Steve Derebey said the proposal "is just their opening letter" in negotiations.

"We don't put a whole lot of stock in it," he said. "Typically this is what they do. They put things into these proposals that are the most draconian proposals, and they tend to negotiate from there because they know they're not going to get everything in those."

The union's leadership is scheduled to meet early next month to further discuss United's proposal.

The carrier "remains committed to working to reach consensual agreements with all our unions to achieve the necessary labor cost savings through fair and equitable changes to wages, benefits and work rules," spokeswoman Jean Medina said in an e-mailed statement.

"We are eager to continue discussions with our unions and remain open to considering all workable options and alternatives that will still provide the long-lasting savings United needs to exit Chapter 11 successfully."

The carrier says it is seeking further labor concessions in part because it has been hammered by high jet-fuel prices and low airfares.

United, the operating unit of UAL Corp., has racked up more than $9 billion in net losses since the end of 2000.A look at United's proposal to pilots

Cut permanent pilot pay through 2010 by 8 percent, plus temporary cut of 4 percent from Jan. 1 until bankruptcy exit

Phase in pay increases of 1.5 percent each year, 2006 through 2010

Reduce vacation, sick leave and health care benefits

Gain right to terminate traditional pension plan and replace with 401(k)-style plan

Increase monthly maximum flight hours for pilots on widebody jets to 95 from 85, and cut minimum days off to 10 or 11 from 12

Replace pilot instructors at Denver flight training center with contractors, resulting in possible union furloughs

Possibly begin having United operate air-freighter operation in which United uses another company's jets and pilots

The union says pay cuts would be as much as 18 percent if the pilots don't agree to any work-rule changes.

United wants to save $191.1 million a year from pilot wage and benefit cuts and work-rule changes.Source: United Airlines





[email protected] or 303-892-2514
 
When is all this $h!t going to end. Asking for paycuts to offset the cost of jet fuel and low ticket prices is not a very good business plan. Give...give...give...No matter what happens they will be back for more. If you flew their planes for free, they would tell you that gas was expensive and ask for a small fee to come to work. I was there for the first round of 30% paycuts, that didn't help them and I ended up getting furloughed. You UAL guys need to tell Tilton to go f*%k himself.
 
Looks remarkably like the play book from USAirways!

Sadly looks like the pension is going buhbye!
 
On Your Six said:
Possibly begin having United operate air-freighter operation in which United uses another company's jets and pilots

the whole thing sucks, but this is the scariest thing in there.
 
"• Possibly begin having United operate air-freighter operation in which United uses another company's jets and pilots.

Yes, I just noticed that one and that is not good. Hopefully such a proposal will result in a resounding no to that item, particularily since UAL has pilot on furlough. Then again, I think the pilots should say no to increasing hourly limits, for as long as pilots are on furlough. Sure it will make up for a bit of the paycut, but that does not make it right or the right thing to do.
 
UAL arguably has some of the best training and CRM programs in the industry. Wouldn't replacing the talented company instructors with contractors possibly alter their admirable safety record, potentially costing far more than it could save?
 
Get out and go where? It started at U, continues at UAL and will affect us all. If the industry was operating under different Ch.11 rules, it would perhaps have assited UAL in not allowing U to continue, but it appears U will be around for a bit longer.

Now the question is how long before AA decides to pursue the issues of pension, they have already mentioned that they are looking at what transpires at UAL and that AA WILL remain competetive.

Further, as we have seen at U, either the pilots agree to a cut or UAL will use the court, precedence has been set.

Perhaps at some point this will turnaround, but my crystal ball remains exceedingdly cloudy these days.
 
Let's all do it and share the pain and we collectively can put ATA, Airtran, Frontier, Jet Blue, Ect. out of business then we can Get our pay rates back up again.

Because, they won't ever be high as long as there are "Airlines" that have low pay and low fares.
 
This spiral will continue downward until pilots walk off the job, just like the AFA is threatening to do. It's going to get much worse.
 
Flying the Line said:
Let's all do it and share the pain and we collectively can put ATA, Airtran, Frontier, Jet Blue, Ect. out of business then we can Get our pay rates back up again.

Because, they won't ever be high as long as there are "Airlines" that have low pay and low fares.
At least the brainwashing appears to have worked...

If you really think putting the low cost carriers out of business will solve all of your problems, I believe you are sorely mistaken.

The market drives this industry and (y)our payscale. If the market could support paying us $300k to fly narrowbodies around the country, then great! More power to us all.

If you think re-regulation would solve all of your problems, it might, if you were part of the lucky 10% that would still have a job after the fare/salary hikes priced 90% of the customers and labor force out of the market.

This industry does not exist solely to give you and me a paycheck. It exists to get people from pt. A to pt. B at whatever price they are willing to pay for the service. For a couple of hundred bucks, the number of folks willing to pony up to go just about anywhere is near limitless. For $600, $800, $2,000, the pool of folks willing to pony up is reduced at a near exponential factor.

If an airline can then provide that A to B service (oh by the way being nice to the folks who pay the bills) and keep their costs down, then it can make a profit.

At the LCC's you mentioned, Frontier, JB and Air Tran, our captain's annual narrowbody salaries are about $130 - $140k (before profit sharing) without working too hard. In fact the work rules are far better than those currently at UAL, for example (sorry UAL folks, I really do hate to hear what's going on around there and sincerely wish you the best).

If you dig up your old AirInc (p-tooey!) pay scales, you'll see that's pretty much in line with comparable narrowbody "major" pay prior to the '00-'01 unsustainable pay raises. IMHO you let your greed and entitlement mindset price yourselves out of the market during a short period of unsustainable, record-setting profits. That would be the Internet Bubble market, by the way, that called your bluff long before 9-11 did.

Again, I am a capitalist pig. Greed is good. It must be tempered with common sense and market realities, however.

I also believe there are enough whiners in this industry that would still complain if they were making $500k working 5 days a month and getting a hummer from the foxy female F1 every leg.

Anyway, our pay is not low. Our work rules are pretty darn good, and most of us actually enjoy our LCC "industry-destroying" jobs.

This is not the only industry affected by declining revenues. The Internet revolution that fueled your fantastic, if unrealistic pay increase, also democratized air travel along with the instantaneous information age. This is a commodity industry. If you can provide a better service at a lower cost, do it.

Keep trying. We'll keep competing. There is plenty of market share for all of us, especially since we, the LCC's keep creating new $200 customers that had never dreamed of flying before.

I sincerely wish you the best of luck in in our collective struggle to survive one of the toughest markets in history.

Have a great Thanksgiving,

Shaggy
 
Flying the Line said:
Let's all do it and share the pain and we collectively can put ATA, Airtran, Frontier, Jet Blue, Ect. out of business then we can Get our pay rates back up again.

Because, they won't ever be high as long as there are "Airlines" that have low pay and low fares.
Spoken like a true AA P.O.S.
 
ShaggyF16 said:
At least the brainwashing appears to have worked...

If you really think putting the low cost carriers out of business will solve all of your problems, I believe you are sorely mistaken.

The market drives this industry and (y)our payscale. If the market could support paying us $300k to fly narrowbodies around the country, then great! More power to us all.

If you think re-regulation would solve all of your problems, it might, if you were part of the lucky 10% that would still have a job after the fare/salary hikes priced 90% of the customers and labor force out of the market.

This industry does not exist solely to give you and me a paycheck. It exists to get people from pt. A to pt. B at whatever price they are willing to pay for the service. For a couple of hundred bucks, the number of folks willing to pony up to go just about anywhere is near limitless. For $600, $800, $2,000, the pool of folks willing to pony up is reduced at a near exponential factor.

If an airline can then provide that A to B service (oh by the way being nice to the folks who pay the bills) and keep their costs down, then it can make a profit.

At the LCC's you mentioned, Frontier, JB and Air Tran, our captain's annual narrowbody salaries are about $130 - $140k (before profit sharing) without working too hard. In fact the work rules are far better than those currently at UAL, for example (sorry UAL folks, I really do hate to hear what's going on around there and sincerely wish you the best).

If you dig up your old AirInc (p-tooey!) pay scales, you'll see that's pretty much in line with comparable narrowbody "major" pay prior to the '00-'01 unsustainable pay raises. IMHO you let your greed and entitlement mindset price yourselves out of the market during a short period of unsustainable, record-setting profits. That would be the Internet Bubble market, by the way, that called your bluff long before 9-11 did.

Again, I am a capitalist pig. Greed is good. It must be tempered with common sense and market realities, however.

I also believe there are enough whiners in this industry that would still complain if they were making $500k working 5 days a month and getting a hummer from the foxy female F1 every leg.

Anyway, our pay is not low. Our work rules are pretty darn good, and most of us actually enjoy our LCC "industry-destroying" jobs.

This is not the only industry affected by declining revenues. The Internet revolution that fueled your fantastic, if unrealistic pay increase, also democratized air travel along with the instantaneous information age. This is a commodity industry. If you can provide a better service at a lower cost, do it.

Keep trying. We'll keep competing. There is plenty of market share for all of us, especially since we, the LCC's keep creating new $200 customers that had never dreamed of flying before.

I sincerely wish you the best of luck in in our collective struggle to survive one of the toughest markets in history.

Have a great Thanksgiving,

Shaggy
Ding, ding, ding...we have a winner!!! Someone finally gets it...
 
Flying the Line said:
Let's all do it and share the pain and we collectively can put ATA, Airtran, Frontier, Jet Blue, Ect. out of business then we can Get our pay rates back up again.

Because, they won't ever be high as long as there are "Airlines" that have low pay and low fares.


Intelligent post. PM me for a Blue Dart.
 
Flying the Line said:
Let's all do it and share the pain and we collectively can put ATA, Airtran, Frontier, Jet Blue, Ect. out of business then we can Get our pay rates back up again.

Because, they won't ever be high as long as there are "Airlines" that have low pay and low fares.
"Our pay rates"?????

And since when is a King Air pilot's pay rates the same as "our's"???

Get a grip Man.............

oh, and Happy Thanksgiving BTW
 
Flying the Line said:
Let's all do it and share the pain and we collectively can put ATA, Airtran, Frontier, Jet Blue, Ect. out of business then we can Get our pay rates back up again.

Because, they won't ever be high as long as there are "Airlines" that have low pay and low fares.
I'm not an airline pilot but I enjoy reading the threads..however you should really think this over before you have the major airlines come together and do what you suggest.

CAN YOU SAY....PRICE FIXING.

Thats what it sounds like and it is very illegal.
Just be careful.
 

Latest resources

Back
Top