canyonblue
Everyone loves Southwest
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Posts
- 2,314
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
BoilerUP said:As a up-and-comer
AFcitrus said:Nor this AirTran pilot. It seems someone has been doing some lobbying on behalf of the airline pilots in our industry without asking the pilots what their opinion is. Some will definitely be in favor of the rule change (see 50+ yr. old pilots with 4 wives) The plight to Increase the retirement age is being fought by the vocal minority and claiming they are representing all of us. I hope the writer of this article will print a retraction to his statements because I, for one, don't want to be included in his broad generalizations.
airbaker said:This JetBlue pilot doesn't agree with the bill either. I've already called my Senator.
We all got into the game knowing the rules; you can't change midstream. I don't say that to be callous, especially to those folks that have had their career's devastated (I've been furloughed for three years myself). But I've always been the type to save for a rainy day, and I know if I lost my medical tomorrow, I'd land on my feet outside of aviation.
FlyGuppies said:Some issues are greater than one's self interests. I have read these posts for a while and am struck by the hint (to be kind) of selfishness abound. Discrimination based on age is no less deplorable and that of sex or skin color(s).
I am a 38 yr old SWA Capt. I have supported the Age 60 Repeal as an FO as I do now.
For those of you that want to retire at age 60, do it. How would that be different than retiring at age 55 with mandatory at age 60? Personally, I like the idea of working a bit longer at my peak earnings level and taking some great vacations or buying that new toy instead of finding a part-time job in retirement with poor wages and no benefits to bridge me to the soon-to-be-gone-as-we-know-it SocSec system.
I understand companies may desire to change benefit parameters to reflect any changes in the law that suits their interests. How is that different than defaulting on your defined benefit plans and giving them wholesale to the PBGC?
I don't pretend to have many answers (any of which are popular) to this problem. Having parents that have worked their tails off well into their sixties I can't escape the notion that I have it easy.
There are no guarantees in life and there is certainly no god given right to retire at age 60.
FlyGuppies said:For those of you that want to retire at age 60, do it.
-9Capt said:Mr. Guppies,
Work till 65 and you can kiss our retirement plans goodbye. It will become impossible to keep the current A/B funds if we are allowed to work to social security benefit age. Personally I like the extra $15,400 AirTran deposited in my Oppenheimer account last year.
That's the main reason I'm against it.
It would be different b/c we would be forced to take a huge hit on our retirement plans if we wanted to leave early, as we are now if we want to leave before 60. Oh wait you don't have a A/B retirement plan, hence your motive. If you want to fly 10 legs a day until you keel over, knock yourself out, just not in 121. I don't mean to make this a have/have not discussion, however, this whole thing is driven by selfish people who think they need more than they do or are living outside their means. If you are a SWA Capt at 38, you should easily be able to retire comfortably at 60 hands down. If not you need to sell the big house/nice car/boat and go live like the paid labor we are.For those of you that want to retire at age 60, do it. How would that be different than retiring at age 55 with mandatory at age 60? Personally, I like the idea of working a bit longer at my peak earnings level and taking some great vacations or buying that new toy instead of finding a part-time job in retirement with poor wages and no benefits to bridge me to the soon-to-be-gone-as-we-know-it SocSec system.
Purpledog said:Take the ALPA poll and voice your opposition to amending the 60 rule!
SemperMe,pdog: who made you the arbiter of what people need to live within their means? this aint no dress rehersal and if someone is fit to fly past 60 then who are you to question their motives? It is none of your business whether or not i have a bmw or a vw beetle. change is inevitable...external forces like Soc Sec, company retirement plans and industry economics change and so will the rules that we have lived by in the past.