Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Good news for poor regional pilots....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web

LearLove

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 27, 2001
Posts
4,451
First year guys/copilots, go ahead and take the 5 finger discount.

You can now steal to make up the diff. according to this church guy.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091222/ap_on_re_eu/eu_britain_shoplifting_ok

"shoplifting can be justified if a person in real need is not greedy and does not take more than he or she really needs to get by"

Jones' Robin Hood-like sermon drew rebukes Tuesday from fellow clergy, shop owners and police.
From his pulpit at the Church of St. Lawrence in York, about 220 miles (355 kilometers) north of London, Jones said in his sermon Sunday that shoplifting can be justified if a person in real need is not greedy and does not take more than he or she really needs to get by.
The remarks drew a summons from Archdeacon Richard Seed, who said on his Web site that the church rejects the view that shoplifting can be acceptable.
"The Church of England does not advise anyone to shoplift, or break the law in any way," he said.
"Father Tim Jones is raising important issues about the difficulties people face when benefits are not forthcoming, but shoplifting is not the way to overcome these difficulties. There are many organizations and charities working with people in need, and the Citizens' Advice Bureau is a good first place to call," Seed's statement said.
Eleanor Course, a spokeswoman for Seed, said the archdeacon wants to meet with Jones to discuss the "appropriateness" of his sermon.
"The point we are most concerned about is that shoplifting is simply not a blameless, victimless crime," she said. "We want to make clear that it simply doesn't help people. And the last thing a desperate person wants is to be caught for shoplifting, so we feel this advice is very unwise."
Jones told The Associated Press that he stands by his comments. He said he regretted only that the media is focusing on his view on shoplifting rather than the underlying problem he wanted to address.
"The point I'm making is that when we shut down every socially acceptable avenue for people in need, then the only avenue left is the socially unacceptable one," he said, adding that people are often released from prison without any means of support, leading them back into crime.
"What I'm against is the way society has become ever more comfortable with the people at the very bottom, and blinded to their needs," he said.
He said shoplifting could help people who are legally entitled to government welfare benefits but have the benefits delayed for bureaucratic reasons.
This approach was quickly rejected by members of the British Retail Consortium, a prominent trade organization trying to reduce theft.
"It's the job of our welfare system, which retailers support with the billions they pay each year in tax, to help vulnerable people," said spokesman Richard Dodd. "There are no excuses for stealing."
The North Yorkshire Police also condemned Jones' approach as counterproductive because people already in marginal conditions would find themselves in trouble with the law if they resorted to shoplifting.
"First and foremost, shoplifting is a criminal offense, and to justify this course of action under any circumstances is highly irresponsible," a police statement read. "Turning or returning to crime will only make matters worse, that is a guarantee."

People in need should turn to charitable organizations and government agencies for help, rather than take matters into their own hands, the police said. "To do this would make the downward spiral even more rapid, both on an individual basis and on society as a whole," the statement said.
 
Last edited:
This wouldn't apply to holders of an ATP since it wouldn't be inline with the "be of good moral character" requirement. Hey, maybe an exemption is coming forth in that new Pilot Improvement Act. LOL!
 
Good-

Now I don't feel the least bit guilty for stealing Gen Lee's Mom's heart.

(and stomping that sucker flat!)
 
As far as shoplifting from retail stores, the best method is 'grab and go'. Don't mozy around trying not to look suspicious, its a sure fire way to get caught. Your best bet is to get in there, get what you want, and get out of dodge before anyone even knows you were there.

But don't take more than you need. :laugh:
 
From the Simpsons sorry don't have the exact line between Bart and the Mafia guy, "Bart, is it wrong to steal a loaf of bread to feed your family?" "I guess not" "Well, suppose your family don't like bread... they like cigarettes..."
 
Would a 52" plasma TV qualify as a need? I promise not to be greedy. I'll even offer to pay for the wires to hook it up!:)
 
Would a 52" plasma TV qualify as a need? I promise not to be greedy. I'll even offer to pay for the wires to hook it up!:)

Steal the cables too! Those HDMI cables are a rip-off.

My wife used to work retail at a national craft store chain. She told me there policy regarding shoplifting was "let them take it". I guess they figured it was easier to figure in some losses, but most of the stuff they sold that could be readily stolen was little crap. I'm sure they wouldn't let you walk out with a fancy sewing machine or something like that.
 
Steal the cables too! Those HDMI cables are a rip-off.

My wife used to work retail at a national craft store chain. She told me there policy regarding shoplifting was "let them take it". I guess they figured it was easier to figure in some losses, but most of the stuff they sold that could be readily stolen was little crap. I'm sure they wouldn't let you walk out with a fancy sewing machine or something like that.

A false accusation of shoplifting would probably cost them 1000 times more in the ensuing lawsuit.

If the merchandise is tiny and expensive the anti-theft tags make them work a little bit to get at the product, and makes them look suspicious. When I worked at a rather large electronics store that was Blue and Yellow, we were not to confront shoplifters. Loss prevention did and that is only if they had video evidence or an alarm went off.

Mark up on cables is insane(sometimes as much as 100x). I get my HDMI cables from monoprice.com. Same stuff as the stores at 1/10th the cost.
 
Last edited:
Steal the cables too! Those HDMI cables are a rip-off.

My wife used to work retail at a national craft store chain. She told me there policy regarding shoplifting was "let them take it". I guess they figured it was easier to figure in some losses, but most of the stuff they sold that could be readily stolen was little crap. I'm sure they wouldn't let you walk out with a fancy sewing machine or something like that.

WAWA must have the opposite policy. (I could be off on some of this stories details but the gist is)

Back in college (1995/6) a friend got caught sliding a 69 cent slim jim up his sleeve on the campus WAWA at 3am (after several bars and off campus parties but he wasn't drunk and was over 21). He as arrested by city cops, spent the night in jail and had to post 5k bond. Back in court the WAWA lawyers tossed everything they could at him. He got 2 weeks in jail/probation and some huge number of hours of community service. All over a 69 cent slim jim.
 
WAWA must have the opposite policy. (I could be off on some of this stories details but the gist is)

Back in college (1995/6) a friend got caught sliding a 69 cent slim jim up his sleeve on the campus WAWA at 3am (after several bars and off campus parties but he wasn't drunk and was over 21). He as arrested by city cops, spent the night in jail and had to post 5k bond. Back in court the WAWA lawyers tossed everything they could at him. He got 2 weeks in jail/probation and some huge number of hours of community service. All over a 69 cent slim jim.
It all starts with a Slim Jim. Imagine if he were never caught. He would have continued with his flight training and ended up living the life of a regional pilot, but instead had no money, decided to stay in school, got a normal job and now lives a normal life. :)
 

Latest resources

Back
Top