cocknbull said:
1. self-rightousness is self-righteousness
2. personna is persona
3. lude is lewd
4. This whole sentance needs to be restructured "The warm fuzzy feeling has left me, and you can certainly count on my anti-sympathetic sentiment as you will undoubtedly respond with additional lewd and crass remarks in the name of the well educated."
5. You need a ";" after "I will give you one thing instead of a ","
6. intelligeble is intelligible
You jsmenkin are the weak-minded one who has allowed management propaganda to corrupt your myopic weak mind.
From the Scab list description of a Scab
"A SCAB takes your job, a Job he could not get under normal circumstances. He can only advance himself by taking advantage of labor disputes and walking over the backs of workers trying to maintain decent wages and working conditions. He helps management to destroy his and your profession, often ending up under conditions he/she wouldn't even have scabbed for. No matter. A SCAB doesn't think long term, nor does he think of anything other then himself. His smile shows fangs that drip with your blood, for he willingly destroys families, lives, careers, opportunities and professions at the drop of a hat. He takes from a striker what he knows he could never earn by his own merit: a decent Job. He steals that which others earned at the bargaining table through blood, sweat and tears, and throws it away in an instant -ruining lives, jobs and careers."
This description matches Gojets pilots to a tea. They are indeed scabs and will be treated as parasites scum. When the dust settles you will find out that you are no more than a tool to be tossed aside by your management friends.
1. "A SCAB takes your job, a Job he could not get under normal circumstances" - is
job or
Job? Since you are criticizing the ability to be precise, I thought you should tell us which form of the word you wanted us to know. Oh, and as far as the comment, I could have landed my job without that entire sentence ever applying to me. You don't know my qualifications.
2. "anything other
then himself" - I think you mean "
than", that would be grammatically correct.
3. "This description matches
Gojets pilots to a
tea" - The proper name of the new airline is GoJ_t Airlines, LLC. (This forum censors the name if spelled properly, and I highly doubt that knew of that effect. So replace the _ with an "e", and you get the point. So properly stated, it would be GoJ_t pilots, without the "s", hereafter reffered to as "GJ". And I think you are trying to use the term "to a
Tee".
Tea is drink, most commonly found in China. And, no, the term is very far from the truth. A little reasearch will tell you that. But, I have a feeling research is a foreign word to you. You would rather follow than lead. A leader would do his research and present a solution.
4. "treated as
parasites scum" - You do not need the "s" on parasites. Correctly written, it should read "treated as
parasite scum". I hope you will stand behind those words! The GJ pilots are more than eager to treat others as others treat them. I have to tell you, what a great way work it all out! Gosh, if we could all just bitch about it without giving solutions, the world would be a much better place if we could all just swim in negativitiy.
English is not even my first language and I found almost as many discrepancies with your writing as you did mine. Truthfully, I did not think this would get to the point of a
spelling competition. The
points made should have been the primary basis for discussion, but I guess you do not have any points to make. You would rather take the road of discontent and send out a string of whining remarks. If you truly have a passion for making a difference, you should take it up with the appropriate individuals, which would be management, not the pilots. This forum is not the place to reach management. And if you think management will not listen, then it is you that has been corrupted by management propaganda. There are ways to diplomatically handle issues like these, but what you are doing will only hurt you and those who act in concert with you.
I know the reasons why GJ had to pursue a separate certificate to grow Trans States Holdings. I know why Trans States Airlines could not accept the contracts that GJ has been given. I know why Trans States Airlines is prohibited by certain agreements from flying greater than 50 seat jets. I know why Trans States pilots are part of that agreement, and for that reason, those pilots have been offered the opportunity to go to GJ under new employment with longevity. These reasons are legitimate, but have not recieved a minute of discussion time on these lounges. Instead of discussing the reality behind the creation of GJ, you people have only taken the opportunity to campaign against it for reasons that you have dreamed up in an effort to make it an acceptable culprit. What a shame. An opportunity that will provide growth for a pilot group four times the size of Trans States Airlines and by its very nature "enhance families, lives, careers, opportunities and professions" by "maintaining decent wages and working conditions" should be praised. Good luck to you, and I hope I never find myself having to offer you a job out of pity for your poor choice of unity.
Viva GJ!