GVFlyer
Well-known member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2002
- Posts
- 1,461
It's a good thing the aircraft is selected and paid for by the people in the back. Of course, GV will tell you that all passengers prefer the smaller cabin of the GV versus the Global as it's more "intimate" and the 650 was driven more by the marketing department and less by passenger input.
The Global Express cabin is 10 inches wider than the Gulfstream G550 cabin. The G650 cabin is 53'7"L x 6'5"H x 8'6"W. Buy the cabin that is appropriate to your mission, but in the process remember Gulfstream's basic design philosophy: No Compromise - Performance First.
Let me explain by comparing the G550 to the Global Express XRS. The thrust deck or propulsive power (Wpa) available determines the aircraft volume that can be propelled through the air at a given speed.
As such, with the same engines (R/R BR710 - G550 - 15,385 lbs thrust, Global Express XRS-14,650 lbs thrust), the volume of the G550 and the Global Express XRS is roughly equivalent. Bombardier spent more of their volume on cabin, Gulfstream spent theirs on wing. The Gulfstream has 1136.6 sq ft of wing, the Global has a 1022 sq. ft. wing The resultant is that the Global is a high wing loading, point design, buffet limited airplane and the Gulfstream is not. In addition to reduced margins, the Global also pays for its cabin design with increased total parasite drag - which is why it has never made advertized range.
In the real world, passenger comfort has a lot to do with how long a passenger is stuck in the airplane. I recently took off from London heading to LAX. Prior to my departure a Global Express took off enroute to Columbus, Ohio. I flew over him by 30 West and landed in Los Angeles 10:29 after takeoff, running against the wind - that to me equals rapid transit and an enhancement to passenger comfort over any other way my passengers could have traveled to LA.