Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

Getting back in to it.....

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
I remember 2 things that my first flight instructor told me in 1963: "There isn't an airplane made that doesn't deserve 100 percent of your attention when you are flying it," and "If necessary, fly it until it finally stops." Thankfully, I only had to do that once.
 
Damn. Missed it. Yup, you must be right. The red and white one?

Not sure what it is to which you're referring. The M18T is a turbine PZL Dromader, a single engine conventional gear airplane used for aerial application and firefighting.

You might be thinking of a M8 Maule.
 
Well,
If the government passes this new requirement that both pilots have 1,500 hours/ATP, then there is no way I could flight instruct that long to build those kinds of hours...not with the family and financial commitments I now currently have. I think while a lot of people are saying it's a good thing that we require both pilots to have that many hours, isn't there going to be a point where we run into a severe shortage of pilots? Yet it won't matter the because there are now federal rules in place that says a person has to have 1500 hrs/atp? It just seems like a lot of people will burn out and not be able to hold on to instructing for that long to make it as an airline pilot.
 
There's no shortage of pilots. There has never been a shortage of pilots. We're not going to see one, either.

There may be a shortage of pilots who are willing to work to get where they need to be.

This career has always required effort and sacrifice. Getting out of flight training and into an airliner has happened, and has happened recently...but is not a realistic view of the world. Traditionally one would instruct for a year or two, seek a job flying freight or traffic watch, fly skydivers on the weekends, ride with friends doing freight runs, do civil air patrol, pipeline patrol, and anything else they could find, and jump from one job to another as experience and opportunity allowed...and ten years later be in a position to aim for the job they wanted.

This is the reality of it. Again the question exists: how committed are you to your career. You stated previously that you're a dispatcher, and you're in the airlines, and you know all about it. You don't, which is why you're being told. You're just not listening.

How committed are you to making a career out of aviation? Not dispatching. Flying. Big difference. If your response is what kind of beer you will drink, your commitment is slim and wanting...and you're not going to make it.

You may recall the story of the great teacher Socrates, who was approached by a student who claimed to want to learn. The story varies, but Socrates held the student's head under water, very nearly drowning him, until the student fought desperately for air. When the struggle was over and Socrates let the student go, he said "When you want to learn as badly as you wanted to breathe, come back and see me again."

How badly do you want to fly?
 

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom