Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Friendliest aviation Ccmmunity on the web
  • Modern site for PC's, Phones, Tablets - no 3rd party apps required
  • Ask questions, help others, promote aviation
  • Share the passion for aviation
  • Invite everyone to Flightinfo.com and let's have fun

GATOR T-43 to retire

Welcome to Flightinfo.com

  • Register now and join the discussion
  • Modern secure site, no 3rd party apps required
  • Invite your friends
  • Share the passion of aviation
  • Friendliest aviation community on the web
No Big Deal

Am I the only one disgusted with contractor's flying a military aircraft?
Most are retired AF. The guy in the pic was my CV (and a really good guy btw) at Columbus. He retired as an O-6 and landed that sweet "retirement" job flying the T-43 at RND. I've got no problem with that. It falls in line with all of the other civilian contracting the AF does. Hondo (or whatever it is called now in CO) and QF-4 flying at PAM comes to mind.
 
Most are retired AF. The guy in the pic was my CV (and a really good guy btw) at Columbus. He retired as an O-6 and landed that sweet "retirement" job flying the T-43 at RND. I've got no problem with that.

Most? Sorry but that does not make it better. A retired guy is a civilian. Civilians should not be flying military aircraft. If they want to go to that point, go all the way. Sell the aircraft to a contract company and hire them to do the training. But an aircraft owned by the military should be flown by military pilots.
 
These contractors take flight billets from active duty guys. Some examples.... T-39s at NAS Pensacola, exchange tour in the T-43, FCFs in the training command.....and I imagine there are more. What once were good deal pilot billets and experience/flight time builders for a progression of active pilots are now contractor jobs for the few. Ironically, these contractors probably enjoyed one of those good deal tours.

Sad.
 
I have fond memories of that bird! I especially liked the looks from the Air Farce weenies when us 17-22 year old enlisted guys got off a training flight and belted out 20 (4 count) pushups.

Oo-rah.
 
Most? Sorry but that does not make it better. A retired guy is a civilian. Civilians should not be flying military aircraft. If they want to go to that point, go all the way. Sell the aircraft to a contract company and hire them to do the training. But an aircraft owned by the military should be flown by military pilots.
Then you should be thrilled that they are retiring the fleet!:rolleyes:
 
I think one of those birds are parked on the north side at KIAH. It has been sitting for a while.
 
Am I the only one disgusted with contractor's flying a military aircraft?

If they are retired, then they pay taxes. If they pay taxes, then they own a (small) part of the airplane. If they own a (small) part of the airplane, then what's the problem with them flying it?

Lighten up, Francis

ka
 
I have a unique perspective seeing as I have flown both Gators and C-12s.

The Gator squadron at the time was a pre-retirement attaboy for guys that had been career trainers. Out of all of the field grade officers in the squadron in leadership positions, only one had ever done anything but ATC. Their view of the world was very limited - and I'm being kind. It was a miserable place for a pilot as a second assignment coming from an operational unit. Most of us were ecstatic when Mather closed and we could move on.

I left Mather and went up to Elmendorf to fly C-12s. Best job I ever had. I kept hoping and praying the Air Force would turn that into a GS position so that I could do that as a retiree. (October of 1997 would have been perfect timing ) Never happened. I had heard that the dew line support mission had transfered to contractor flights but I'm not certain about that.
 
Last edited:

Latest resources

Back
Top Bottom